Mark Teixeira Turns Down The Washington Nationals In Favor Of The Evil Empire...The New York Yankees.
Well...let's see how the DC Faithful react to the news...
Mark Teixeira signs with the New York Yankees for a reported 8-years and $180M.
I'll admit it, whether or not I thought it was a good idea, I was starting to believe. Especially after reading last night's report that the Washington Nationals had increased their initial offer to free agent first baseman Mark Teixeira from 8-years and $160M to somewhere around 8-years/$178-184M, leading me to speculate that Washington had upped their offer to outpace any of the other teams still in the chase for the 28-year old switch-hitting slugger. Then I remembered...
It's the Yankees' world, we're all just living in it. (mumbles..."$423.5M on 3 players...")
In the end it didn't matter if Washington had been at the high end of their reported $184M dollar offer to Teixeira, because, as MLB.com's Bill Ladson reports in his article on the end of the Nationals' chase entitled, (somewhat misleadingly), "Nationals fall short in Teixeira bidding", quoting another in a seemingly endless supply of anonymous major league sources:
"...Teixeira's agent, Scott Boras, told the Nationals that Texieira wanted to win now and felt the Nationals were not ready to win."
...and the Nationals' attentions, as promised, have quickly turned to free agent 1B/OF/SM** Adam Dunn, (aka "The Bigger Wilkerson"), at least according to Mr. Ladson's article...Washington Post writer Chico Harlan, in his post at the Nationals Journal entitled, "Teixeira to Yankees", writes that he thinks, "Perhaps they will explore Adam Dunn as an alternative, but even that is still a part of internal debate."
It's interesting then, to read the full transcript of last week's live chat with DC GM Jim Bowden now that MLB.com's Bill Ladson has it up in an article entitled, "Bowden takes questions from fans", because one fan asks about the health of the only first baseman who is actually on the Nationals' roster at the moment, Nick Johnson, who, Mr. Bowden reports, has been told by doctors who have examined his wrist, "...that he will be 100-percent by the beginning of Spring Training."
It might be hard to trade a recovering Nick Johnson, but Johnson would have to be moved to make room for Adam Dunn if DC was to sign the free agent to play first since their outfield is already overloaded, and the only mention of a solution to the logjam out there is from MLB.com's Bill Ladson, again in his article, "Nationals fall short in Teixeira bidding", where he writes that since the Nationals don't believe he can play center and because all of their other outfielders are corner outfielders, "(Lastings) Milledge could be trade bait before the season starts."
The popular refrain I'm hearing from the Nationals' fans goes something like, "Sheets, Hudson, Dunn", referring to free agent pitcher Ben Sheets, infielder Orlando Hudson and the aforementioned Adam Dunn. I hope the DC Front Office hears it as well, (and I hope they don't plan on relying on the possibililty that the DC Faithful will just be happy with the fact that they tried to sign Teixeira)...I'd think about adding a few quality players if I were them...and quickly...
(ed. note - " ** = Strikeout Machine")
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
It's a great day to be a part of...
The Nick Johnson FanClub!!!!
Now if we can just get the Yankees to sign Dunn too…
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Dec 23, 2008 7:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The problem with trading Johnson is that his value's hard to find.
I mean, he walks and plays excellent D for a first baseman, can hit for a moderate average with moderate power, and has passable (I think) baserunning. The two biggest contributions he makes aren’t viewed favorably at first base – I think he’s good enough to play every day (provided he can stay healthy), but the return for him would likely be limited because of his skill distribution and inability to stay healthy.
by Graysnail on Dec 23, 2008 9:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Career .400 OBP + 125 OPS+ = $
What did NJ do with his last full season? 290/428/520, 23 HR, 77 RBI. I’ll grant you it’s not a classic 1B offensive profile, and the trick is getting that “full season” out of fragile Nick. The value—if he’s healthy—is easy to see. It’s getting someone to take a chance on his health that’s the trick. Trading NJ will probably get us about as much in return as trading AK (both are big faves of mine, but I’ll be the first to admit they’ve done crap-all lately). A couple of expensive guys (expensive for Nats, that is) with flashes of great promise, currently hobbled by injuries with no recent performance to trade on. This means we’re stuck with both of ’em for next season, most likely?
"Next year we'll make it better." -- Mannyger Acta
by Doghouse on Dec 24, 2008 12:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So no Dunn in your opinion...I'm with it...
Chico (the writer) said that their was a difference of opinion in the front office about whether or not to chase Dunn…I wonder who’s leading the “Sign-Dunn” side of the argument…???
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Dec 24, 2008 12:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't go for Dunn...
…which is not to say Trader Jim won’t. If he does, I think we’ll get nothing for NJ, and NJ is Dunn with more OBP and less SLG (and not that much more/less, to be honest). Of course, gambling on a healthy Nick is a real gamble, especially with DaMeathook as Plan B… Does The Amazing Willie Harris play first? Too short, I guess.
"Next year we'll make it better." -- Mannyger Acta
by Doghouse on Dec 24, 2008 12:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't tell Willie Harris he can't grow a few inches...
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Dec 24, 2008 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, what improvement do you get with Dunn?
He has fall-down range wherever he goes, and while he’s an OBP beast, is the power worth a slug in the field? (Honestly, I don’t know, I haven’t done that math.) More importantly, is the improvement between NJ / NJ’s injury replacement(s) worth the upgrade to Dunn?
by Graysnail on Dec 24, 2008 1:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's kind of what I'm seeing, too.
Kearns has value because of his D (and really, the bat can’t get much worse than what it was last year); I’m of the mind that the teams who value those components don’t need either of them, and teams that don’t value those components will low-ball Trader Jim. Of course, that’s also the downside of having good defenders at positions where good defenders aren’t really much of a factor.
by Graysnail on Dec 24, 2008 1:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no one
I know we need to get better….but, as soon as we fall into the trap of signing overpriced FAs in statistical decline all we do is end up overpaying for declining production and/or injury rehab, then we become no better than the Skins. If any city should know this formula doesn’t work, it’s DC. You might as well run a list of Deion, Armstead, Taylor, Archulleta, etc. It sounds good at the time, but in retrospect you almost always end up regretting these signings. If we can get Dunn or Hudson for 3 years or less, or Sheets on an incentive laden contract, then we at least minimize our risk. But, it make no sense to get into a bidding war for players that add a couple of wins, especially if that constrains our options later to get better players. Every year you see FA’s like this list available…and the following year you read about teams trying trade them and cannot, even if they eat some salary. Look at Jose Guillen, Jason Marquis, Carlos Lee, Barry Zito, Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre, Richie Sexson, Carl Pavano, Kevin Millwood, Jose Castillo, etc, etc, etc.
In the end I guess we waste money on one or two of these “names” because we need some good press, and since DC is not a baseball town, management thinks the fans will fall for it. It will shut up idiots like Boswell who have been calling for us to spend our way to respectibility. Overpaying for marginal talent is not a winning strategy….just ask the skins.
by vaclipper on Dec 23, 2008 9:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Mets can speak to signing overpriced FA's w/declining performance
L. Castillo
P. Martinez
M. Anderson
O. Hernandez
M. Alou
" When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir? " - John Meynard Keynes
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on Dec 24, 2008 10:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
defense and speed
Time to go to the unplanned Plan B—spend money on defense and speed to build credibility. The worthwhile FA’s are spurning the Nats due to the 100+ Losses last season. Defense and speed are undervalued in the league so we could improve in these areas on the cheap in comparison to going after a Left Handed slugger in his prime. Orlando Hudson is top on my list, kearns should be jettisoned for any relief pitching whatsoever. I think Dunn would at least add pop to the lineup, but the Nats shouldn’t go that route because that would put us in the middle of a bidding war with the LA Angels, who will simply outspend us.
Either way, this is the offseason for Bowden to earn his money/save his job. The owner has put big money on the table for him to make moves with. The Nats have two draft picks in the top ten. And there are holes all over the lineup and bullpen. Make a move, JimBo!
by VA SLIM on Dec 24, 2008 12:47 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















