The NL Needs the DH
A number of current MLB controversies have made it clear that the game is moving forward into a new era. One fan tries to find the best balance between past and present.
From http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/the-nl-needs-the-dh
Baseball is an exhilarating yet frustrating mess of contradictions, and this fan is caught in the trap—like millions of other men and women (save George Will, whose pompous moral certitude about the sport is immutable)—of trying to reconcile “purist” instincts with the undeniable improvements in the game over the past several decades. Last weekend, for example, while watching a slew of inter-league contests via the MLB “Extra Innings” package (which, regardless of varying prices depending on your locale and cable provider, costs less for an entire season of televised games than one day at a stadium for a family of four), I finally switched gears and figured it was time for the National League to acquiesce and adopt the still-controversial designated hitter rule.
Heresy, I guess, but what the hell; if you’re a Milwaukee Brewers’ devotee, wouldn’t it be delightful to see the world’s tubbiest vegetarian, Prince Fielder, in the dugout, contemplating his next plate appearance, instead of anchored at first base? One league’s dominance over the other usually runs in cycles, but the N.L. seems mired in a slump that’s likely to run longer than the Great Depression, and this was evident once again over the weekend. Sure, the strategy required of an N.L. manager is more intricate than A.L. counterparts with double-switches and more sacrifice bunts, but the two leagues might be more competitive if older free agents (or crummy fielders) could extend their careers as a DH.
That said, and here’s one of those curveballs, I can’t stand inter-league play, even though it pumps up attendance and allows fans to see star players who were once a mystery aside from the All-Star game (which, of course, has devolved into a meaningless exhibition game instead of a proud showcase) or the World Series. My 13-year-old son, with whom I have the pleasure of sitting next to in our matching easy chairs in the homestead’s television room, adamantly disagrees, but I chalk that up to his participation in a fantasy league with a bunch of school buddies. I just don’t like the disruption of the season’s rhythm, the fake “rivalries” cooked up by MLB schedule makers—sure, the Cubs and White Sox make sense, but the Rockies and Tigers?—for the sake of novelty and profit.
See the rest at http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/the-nl-needs-the-dh
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
I'm not convinced.
While it’s true that NL teams should do better in interleague play at AL parks with rosters built around accomodating a DH, that doesn’t make it good baseball. In the NL, every player must do both offense and defense. Sure, that means less places for slow-footed, stone-handed veterans with good batting eyes and powerful wrists, but… so? The first step to good baseball is having everyone play baseball! The DH is a one small step toward turning baseball into football. Getting rid of the DH isn’t keeping baseball “pure,” it’s keeping baseball “good.”
When in doubt, blame PLoD
by Doghouse on Jul 1, 2008 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen, Doghouse. Sorry, Smitty.
I’ll have a more detailed response later, for now, The DH is an abomination…though I thought your argument was well-written and humorous, I am a purist and I am not ashamed to say so, and as for “undeniable improvements”...
Are 4 hour-plus games one of these improvements?
There is one thing we agree on, though, MLB.tv is the best thing going…I still can’t believe the low price…the MLB Extra Innings package is more than twice the price, and as for tickets to games? Forget it, I go once or twice a year now, that’s all I can stand to pay…
Everything I say is a "little" sarcastic...
by Ed Chigliak on Jul 1, 2008 7:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why change?
I belive the AL should not keep the DH, it lets some of the stars hang around longer. They get to go though the end of thier careers without the torture of the the field,(come on). Both deffence and offence should be in the player’s game period.
by spurscitizen on Jul 8, 2008 3:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Players Union will never let go of all the DH jobs that would be cut by eliminating the position...but that's no reason to spread that filth over to the NL...
...where they play the good old game, 8 fielders and a pitcher, who might not be able to hit, but can move runners while sacrificing himself or if the either team has a big lead, do as Don Sutton suggests ,and swing and make contact with the first pitch and get out of there so everygame doesn’t last four hours…
"The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous." - V
by Ed Chigliak on Jul 12, 2008 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NL
Is way more interresting with the no DH rule. It makes managers have to gameplan. The DH is boring and anyone that can just hit and not field shouldn’t be in the majors.
by CptChaosSidekick on Jul 8, 2008 5:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















