Goodbye Columbus, NATS AAA team
Well, just to continue the turmoil, the Nats have now ended their connection to Columbus, Ohio as a AAA affiliate. This lasted all of two years with the former Yankee AAA city. Now the question is where the team will put its top minor league team. probably far from the DC fans and sportswirters to hide the fact that the "Plan "is not working. The Wash. Post seems to feel Syracuse, NY, will be open when the Blue Jays farm team leaves. The logical place would be in Richmond, VA, because of its closeness to DC. The Braves are leaving there after some 40 years. Richmond, however, needs a new stadium up to AAA standards, and I'm sure the Lerners will do nothing to help in that area.
Now here's the surprise sleeper that the Wash. Post mentions in passing, as a possible new location for the Nats AAA team. Now since I'm big on the whole Lerner strategy as to where they are going with ownership of the Nats, that is, keep all costs low and sell the team for twice what it is worth in about 5 years, the magic city mentioned as the next possible location is none other than Las Vegas, NV. Yes, that's right, Las Vegas, the town that lost out to DC for the Nats. If the Nats move their farm team to Las Vegas, I believe, that will be a good indicator as to where the team might be headed in about five years. The strategy here is to build up fan support for the Nats organization than sell and move the team to Las Vegas, land of gold and honey. All of this will be after the Nats Lerner organization continues to field a minor league team with poor marketing and relations with the city resulting in ever decreasing fan attendance. This all will give the Lerner's a reason to sell the team for a huge profit under the pretenses that DC cannot support a team, but somehow Baltimore can. I believe a secret deal or agreement was made long ago between the Lerners, MLB, and Peter Angeloes dealing with this whole scenario.MLB does not want to be in DC.
Maybe I should change my name to "Nats Cynic'. I pray that I am wrong and the Nats will acquire a few major, blue chip players in the off season, but I don't count on it.
wxguy
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
How's about New Orleans...
The Zephyrs were mentioned in a few pieces I read.
Hey, wxguy, your FanPost is generating some traffic, a site from Syracuse has picked up on it in there story about the Nationals having a look around upstate NY…
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Sep 18, 2008 3:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Though they seem to have misunderstood your conspiracy theory as a desire to move to Vegas...
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Sep 18, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...and by "there" story, I of course mean, "their"...
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Sep 18, 2008 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Syracuse it is.....
I trust you’ve realized that the Braves owned the franchise in Richmond, so there is no “team” there. Now, if the Lerners wanted Richmond, they get them to re-build the stadium, destroy the Syracuse franchise (which shouldn’t be hard considering the whiners at mr. chigliak’s link), and re-locate after the two year contract expires.
Personally, I’d like for them to return to New Orleans, as the Zephyrs play in the local team’s PCL league, and I’d like to see the Nats’ kids and the DL roster play.
by cat daddy3000 on Sep 18, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
New Orleans is too far away from DC for a Nats AAA team.
Weren’t the Nats/Expos AAA team in New Orleans before Columbus?
With ever rising fuel costs, the transporting of players between farm teams and their major league team location is an ever increasing cost. That’s why Richmond would be the cheaper alternative, but Syracuse has a better stadium?!?!? New Orleans is too far and might not be there in the coming decade due to hurricanes.
It’s not impossible to see the Nats’ AAA team in Las Vegas because the folks there would probably pay for everything including transportation costs and a new stadium just to prove they deserve a MLB team. MLB has already publicly stated that Las Vegas would be the next MLB city if they expand or move a team. If the Nats moved to LV they would probably switch to the American League West division which is the only MLB divison with just four teams. Pittsburgh Pirates would then move to replace the Nats in the NL East and MLB would then have 5 teams in every division. Check it out. This would also give MLB and the Lerners are a quick escape city if things go down hill in DC over the next 5 years or so. LV casinos could buy all the season tickets to give visiting guests at all their gambling casino hotels, so that the Nats would not have to worry about a marketing dept. to sell tickets. The casinos would take care of that. Believe me MLB has been salivating to get into LV.
Some theory, right?!?!?
wxguy
by wxguy on Sep 18, 2008 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just see the Houston Astros as a better altenative for the AL West...
…with the natural Texas rivalry and all.
There’s got to be a reason there’s still no major league team in ANY sport in Vegas.
I agree, Richmond makes the most sense geographically, and it would be feasible to make prospects drive the awful NY Thruway to NJ Turnpike to I-95 cannon ball run when called up if the team goes to Syracuse…
Now that the Florida teams are getting new parks…I’m starting to believe…
Seriously though, I’d be more willing to believe the team was moving if they hadn’t built Nationals Park…has any team, EVER abandoned a brand new ballpark like that? Am i painfully ignorant here or completely forgetting something like that happening?
WOW…the idea of a tourist fan base for a team in Las Vegas is absolutely frightening…I bet the stadium would have Slots in the bathrooms…they do have enough of a local population to support a team now though, I imagine…
Don’t doubt MLB wants to go there and DC’s lost two teams already…but I doubt it this time…
Is that what everyone said the last two times???
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Sep 18, 2008 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's settle back and relax...
…as much as the Nationals are struggling on the field and at the gate, as dreadful as their radio and TV ratings are, they aren’t going anywhere — not with a 30-year lease. The “X” factor here is how well the Nats will fare as a genuine contender, something the D.C. area hasn’t experienced since the mid-forties. We got a taste of what it might be like in June of 2005, those brief, heady days when an upstart team won 10 in a row, moved atop the NL East and drew great crowds to RFK. (Had that year’s radio-TV setup been stronger, that would have shown in the ratings, too.) I hope I’m not sounding like a “stay the course, Stan” optimist; I think the franchise is poorly run and marketed (no Clint! no “Sweet Caroline”!), and I’d dismiss Jim Bowden yesterday. But Calvin Griffith and Bob Short are both dead and gone, and their ghosts aren’t returning here.
Regarding the AAA situation, I think it will be Syracuse. The Nats want the Chiefs — believe it or not, it’s reasonably accessible. Syracuse is along I-81, home of two current Nats’ affiliates…Hagerstown and Harrisburg. All things being equal, I’d like Richmond, too, but until there’s a AAA shuffle (and a new ballpark there), it’s not going to happen. (And since the Syracuse team is community-owned, it won’t be the one moving.)
by vp19 on Sep 19, 2008 2:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hello, Syracuse. Nats New AAA team.
And the winner is Syracuse, NY. It will now be the I-81 farm system, Syracuse, Harrisburg, and Hagerstown. However, in my mind, Richmond would have been even better as part of a I-95 farm system ( Nats, Potomac, and Richmond) in the great state of Virginia. Richmond is only 2 hours away, not a 7 hour drive to Syracuse. Fans in Syracuse, New York, are probably more Yankees or Mets fans. Now all we need is some real future star draft picks to go along with a couple of veteran blue chip stars and pennant we come.
wxguy
by wxguy on Sep 21, 2008 9:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Richmond is done with triple A baseball
There is no way Richmond would get a team unless some city with a team moves there. Without a new stadium chances are very slim, that’s why the Atlanta Braves, who owns the Richmond franchise moved out. As far as Syracuse, they have a modern stadium that is one of the best in the minors. The Syracuse team is community owned and most likely would be very difficult to buy. All minor league teams own a license and the only way one would lose the license would be to not meet major league standards.
by ronaldo209 on Sep 21, 2008 4:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What the hell
are you going to do with that stadium if you guys move in five years?
The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST
by the fix is in on Sep 22, 2008 12:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















