The Washington Nationals Called "Biggest Offseason Losers" By USA TODAY...Chicago or DC? Will President Obama Throw Out Two First Pitches?
The Washington Nationals Labeled Losers...
Having added only Josh Willingham, Scott Olsen and Daniel Cabrera to the Washington Nationals' 102-loss roster, the DC franchise is recognized by USA Today Sports Weekly's Bob Nightengale, in an article entitled, (brace yourself, DC Faithful), "Nationals not in Yankees' ballpark", in the most recent newstand edition of the supplement to the paper's sports coverage, where Mr. Nightengale cites New York's roster additions as the offseason's best, while awarding the Nationals the title of the "Biggest offseason losers", writing:
"They talked a big game all winter, but we're still waiting on the big signing. They don't look any better today than they did when they lost 102 games last season."
The Yankees, of course, were able to add around $450 million dollars in payroll, signing the best pitcher in baseball, CC Sabathia, (Arguably...Lincecum anyone?), as well as the best bat on the market, Mark Te - - - - - ra, and the biggest risk, in oft-injured pitcher A.J. Burnett, who has the stuff, when healthy, to be a number one starter on any staff in the league that doesn't also include Sabathia. Mr. Nightengale quotes the DC GM Jim Bowden in the article repeating the Nationals' offseason wish list of, "...a big bat in the middle of the lineup that hits left-handed and one or two more starting pitchers," that will speed up the franchise's rebuilding efforts, but as Mr. Nightengale concludes his gloomy condemnation, "...for a team entering its fifth season in D.C., little has changed."
STRASBURG FILES...
On to some positive news, USA TODAY sports writer Andy Gardiner, in an article that's part of the Sports Weekly's College Preview entitled, "Rating regional powers", has a capsule entitled, "Aztec tops draft pyramid", where Mr Gardiner confirms San Diego State starter Stephen Strasburg as, "...the consensus favorite among baseball insiders to be the No.1 pick in June," which does, of course, belong to the Washington Nationals. The USA TODAY/ESPN coaches' poll has Strasburg's Aztecs listed amongst teams that received votes in the polling, but SDS didn't rank as one of the Top 25 programs in the country.
(ed. note - "For a more detailed, but slightly troubling look at Strasburg's delivery, check out the SBN's resident scout's opinion at Driveline Mechanics, where Kyle Boddy compared the young pitcher to Mark Prior in an article entitled, "Quick Note: Stephen Strasburg", earlier this winter.")
A-Hands Or Belli?
Assuming that the Washington Nationals are not going to add Orlando Hudson to their roster, it's going to be a battle between Anderson Hernandez and Ronnie Belliard for the second base job in DC, and Hernandez told MLB.com's Bill Ladson, as quoted in an article entitled, "Hernandez has bigger things in mind", that after a successful winter league performance with the Dominican League champion Tigres de Licey:
"'I'm going for the second-base job,' Hernandez said during the Tigers-Giants series. 'I haven't been told anything specific [by the Nationals], but I want to make the team however I can, in whatever role I can.'"
As far back as October, in another article by MLB.com's Bill Ladson entitled, "Nationals see reason for optimism in 2009", Belliard was identified as the backup second baseman behind, at that time, Hernandez and Emilio Bonifacio, who was subsequently dealt, along with two prospects, to Florida in return for Willingham and Olsen, who were both arbitration eligible and therefore not long for the Marlins.
Hernandez started at second all winter with Licey, even after Belliard joined the team, (playing third and not hitting too well in the postseason), though he came through in the end, scoring the DWL Championship Series' winning running...on a single by Anderson Hernandez.
Federalbaseball.com Daringly Mixes Politics And Baseball...
Chicago Tribune reporter Dave van Dyck wrote this afternoon, in an article entitled, "White Sox invite President Barack Obama to throw out first pitch at season opener", that the Chicago White Sox did just that, requesting that the 44th President of the United States appear back in Chicago on April 6th for the Sox' season opener at Cellular Field, which shouldn't preclude President Obama's meeting the Washington Nationals' Team President Stan Kasten's request to throw out the first pitch in Nationals Park on April 13th against the Phillies a week later.
Will President Obama accept the Nationals' invitation? As an uncredited piece back in USA TODAY Sports Weekly points out, "The team hopes Obama will continue a tradition that dates to William Howard Taft in 1910." The wikipedia page for Ceremonial First Pitches has a list of all the Presidential First Pitches, including President Taft's 1910 toss in National Park all the way up to W's high and wide offering in Nationals Park in last year's Inaugural Opener.
If he accepts...Will President Obama throw a strike? Think anyone's given President Obama a Nationals cap yet?
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
Biggest Losers?
I don’t like the way the Front Office is handling the Dunn situation, but to call the Nats’ bigger losers than the Padres is absurd: the Nats have actually improved themselves, albeit nowhere near enough. Willingham and Olsen are definitely upgrades. The Padres have lost players including the all-time saves leader. They are trying to trade Peavey and we know they will not get anything near fair value in return.
Sports writers are a lazy lot.
by hisownfool on Jan 30, 2009 10:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not to be a homer, but I must agree...
…we’ve improved even during the ill-fated 2008 season by dumping PLoD, FLop, and other slackers. HOF rightly notes Hammer and Olsen as upgrades, which we didn’t overpay to get (not bargains, but not ripoffs at this point, either). Who can look at the projected 2009 starting lineup and honestly say it’s worse that what we fielded in 2008 (heck, just fielding a healthy 2008 lineup would be an improvement… hmm, I feel a Stats Post coming on!)? Perhaps all 29 other teams in MLB improved more than we did in the offseason (although I doubt that), and perhaps we haven’t improved “enough” (which I’d probably agree with, whatever the heck “enough” would be), but we certainly haven’t “lost” or moved backward.
"Next year we'll make it better." -- Mannyger Acta
by Doghouse on Jan 30, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In response to both of you...
Mr. Nightengale has the Padres listed 2nd, San Diego finished 63-99 and they’ve lost Hoffman and K. Greene added Heath Bell, David Eckstein and Mark Worrell, while they’re still attempting to deal their best pitcher, Peavy. The Nationals finished with 4 less wins than the Padres, but added Olsen, the Hammer and “The Project” Daniel Cabrera…How can anyone objectively claim that Washington is worse off?
And to add to your idea, Doghouse, the Nationals, “certainly haven’t ‘lost’ or moved backwards”, while the Padres definitely have…and when they trade Peavy, if they do, it’s even worse…
Why does everyone love to hate DC?
Oh, and in case you haven’t seen the newest video on the Nationals’ Official Site…
Stan Kasten, Nationals’ Team President also calls the NY Mets, “The Hated Mets”, I knew I always liked this guy!!!!
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 30, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A disturbance in The Force (Otherwise known as "E" Chigliak)
Yes. The Mets are the most 2nd most hated despised team in baseball. Before, I would have been insulted by this, but after reading; The Bad Boys Won, I wear hated / despised as a badge of honor…Thank you very much!
" PLEASE! CHANGE THE PATCH! "
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on Jan 30, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me clarify something
The disturbance is “E”. He’s not The Force. ;-)
" PLEASE! CHANGE THE PATCH! "
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on Jan 30, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Nationals should take this all personally and react accordingly by...
…well, at least playing .500 ball?
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 30, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've expressed my own displeasure with the Dunn dealings often, hisownfool,
What is it that you don’t like?
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 30, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What is it that you don’t like?
I should have been clearer: I mean that I think the FO is being too clever by half waiting for the price to come down and get him on the cheap(er). At least that’s my impression. I could be wrong: Dunn may not want to sign with DC until he has exhausted every possibility of signing with a playoff contender.
After last year and my act of faith in not only signing up again for partial seasons tickets but actually buying more (albeit less expensive seats), I’m not in the mood for excuses.
by hisownfool on Jan 30, 2009 6:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Dunn may not want to sign with DC until he has exhausted every opportunity"
- much more on this front in tomorrow’s post…
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 30, 2009 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
heck, just fielding a healthy 2008 lineup would be an improvement
Agreed. It took an exceptional amount of bad luck to lose 102 games last year: everything that could go wrong did go wrong. If the Nats’ luck merely reverts to the mean, that’s probably worth at least 7 or 8 wins (yes, I did pull that figure out of my a**). If Milledge and Dukes build on their second-half success, who knows? And if one of them has a “breakout season” (please, let it be Dukes) then this team could surprise. I’m not saying Tampa Bay surprise but be a pleasent surprise for a change.
by hisownfool on Jan 30, 2009 6:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Doghouse used some fringe-math to prove that The Nationals should have won 4-5 more games last year...
…the post is on the front page now, but i’ll link it here
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 30, 2009 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fringe math
Isn’t that the kind of math they’re using on the hill for the stimulus package?
" PLEASE! CHANGE THE PATCH! "
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on Jan 30, 2009 9:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, sabremetrics is way less fringey than the "stimulating" math on the Hill.
And I didn’t prove we should have won more games, I “proved” we should have won more games. (That is, scare-quotes proved—not to be confused with actual proof.)
"Next year we'll make it better." -- Mannyger Acta
by Doghouse on Jan 30, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im ok with the nationals offseason. We did not land any free agents but we got two good young players who are major league ready and cheap. We set ourselves up financially for our future, and we also kept our option open for the draft.
www.TheNatsBlog.com
by yardyoder on Jan 31, 2009 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Nationals HAVE to sign both 1st Round picks (and all the rest too)...
…to make all the “not-spending” worth it…Pay Zimmerman, pay Olsen, Willingham…
and then give Strasburg anything he wants…
"Nothin' wrong with my leg, I'm just B-boy limpin'" - MCA
by Ed Chigliak on Jan 31, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























