Is Don Mattingly Under Consideration As The Washington Nationals' Next Skipper?
After a 14-year career at first base with the New York Yankees, Don Mattingly came out of retirement to become the Yanks' hitting coach at the request of Yankees' owner George Steinbrenner in 2004, but according to New York Times' writer Tyler Kepner's October 24, 2007 article entitled, "Mattingly returned with managing in mind":
"Mattingly accepted Steinbrenner’s offer to be the team's hitting coach, but his true ambition was to be the manager after Joe Torre."
After 12 seasons, 6 pennants and 4 World Series titles, the Yankees decided to part ways with Torre after a 94-68 2007 campaign that saw New York lose to the Cleveland Indians in a four-game NLDS series, and Don Mattingly was one of three finalists for the job along with Joe Girardi, who had just won the NL Manager of the Year award for his work with the cash-strapped Marlins and Yankees' first base coach Tony Pena. Girardi, of course, as we know, was chosen as Torre's replacement, and Mattingly's response made his disappointment clear, as he said through spokesman Ray Schulte, as quoted in a Bloomberg.com article by Larry DiTore entitled, "Girardi picked as Yankees' manager, Mattingly says":
"'Don extends congratulations to Joe and wishes him and the organization good luck next year.'"
(cont.)...
The former Yankees' decision to leave New York was to be expected, after all, it was Mattingly's intention to become a major league manager, "From the time I took the hitting job, I knew what I wanted to do," Mattingly told the New York Times' Tyler Kepner, before he knew the Yankees would go with Girardi:
"For every step I’ve gone through, I’ve been paying attention to the way things are handled — the way spring training is run, the way things happen in the clubhouse, just paying attention.
I wouldn't have come back to just do the hitting. I wasn't really willing to say it publicly until the last year or year and a half, but I've known from the beginning what I wanted."
Mattingly joined Joe Torre in LA when he took over as manager there and even as the Dodgers are battling the Philadelphia Phillies for the NLCS crown, rumors persist that this will be Torre's unhappy in Los Angeles, and according to Former DC GM Jim Bowden's latest tweeted update on the Nationals' Manager search, Mattingly is once again faced with a situation similar to that which he faced in NY, as Mr. Bowden writes:
"Torre says he probably won't manage Dodgers past 2010...Mattingly will have to decide, should he wait for 2011 or pursue the Nationals opening?"
?'s For The DC Faithful...
• Is "Donnie Baseball" the right man for the Nationals' Manager job?
• Can the Nationals afford another rookie Manager? Or should they go with an experienced skipper?
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
If the Nats go with a rookie manager, at least go with one who played MLB and was successful.
Gibson or Mattingly.
by ROSCOEtheNATSfan on Oct 18, 2009 1:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Man, what a crapshoot......too many variables, the most important of which is how will the players react....
and there is no way of knowing that…..
Mezza: ''Are we there yet?'' ...Roscoe: "In baseball hell? Yes we are."
"Freakish things are happening."
by cat daddy3000 on Oct 18, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s a comparison… Manny was as ready to be a manager as Jim Zorn was to be a head football coach. The difference is…the public was in favor of Manny when he was chosen.
by ROSCOEtheNATSfan on Oct 18, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still, no one knows if their system or beliefs will work, or work with the players handed to them until they try to implement it.
Mezza: ''Are we there yet?'' ...Roscoe: "In baseball hell? Yes we are."
"Freakish things are happening."
by cat daddy3000 on Oct 18, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True...
What I do want is a manager who has at least been exposed to a winning system either while playing or coaching.
by ROSCOEtheNATSfan on Oct 18, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I'm willing to be interested in a guy like that, rather than an experienced manager who's never done anything.
Or, that mustache and glasses guy……
Mezza: ''Are we there yet?'' ...Roscoe: "In baseball hell? Yes we are."
"Freakish things are happening."
by cat daddy3000 on Oct 18, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And who are these people voting for Riggler?
Fans of the other teams in the NL East?
Mezza: ''Are we there yet?'' ...Roscoe: "In baseball hell? Yes we are."
"Freakish things are happening."
by cat daddy3000 on Oct 18, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
crickets......
and Hendo’s Hutch throws Tim Foli into the mix….along with Riggles and Mattingly
Mezza: ''Are we there yet?'' ...Roscoe: "In baseball hell? Yes we are."
"Freakish things are happening."
by cat daddy3000 on Oct 18, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not with those sideburns!
Why would we keep picking managers with no management experience? A good MLB playing career does not a good MLB managing career make. I would have thought they are two different things (although ill concede that a long successful career also helps in building management experience). I’d much prefer an experienced manager than another version of Manny Acta. I kept hearing about how he was going to change the world – and for the first season I thought it was a decent move – but it was pretty clear this year that he didn’t have enough disclipne with the playing group…especially on defense.
For all of Riggler’s faults – experience counts in this game and it showed in spades when he took over the team. We need someone who has been around a while who can make this team a winner. We cant be ‘rebuilding’ forever…(we could have built the pyramids by now).
/end rant
Padilla walked into the Nats' clubhouse for the first time and said, "My God. I'm in heaven."
by Mezza on Oct 18, 2009 7:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















