It's time to end the experiment
So far (hopefully it's over)
34.1 IP, 40 H, 28 BB, 32 R, 19 ER, 13 K
The key numbers I want to look at are the third one (obviously), the fifth one (a massive indictment on the defense as well. Five of the runs in Monday's outing were unearned because of one error, but it's just disgusting to think that a pitcher could allow thirteen unearned runs in 34 innings), and the final one.
We'll work backwards, and start with the complete lack of strikeouts. They were what made him a sexy fantasy pick for a couple of years in Baltimore, despite the fact that he's never been known to attack the zone much. At the time, his fastball topped off in the high 90s and usually stuck between 94 and 96 when he wasn't reaching back for something extra. I'm sure that I'm not the only Nats fan that's seeing Cabrera's fastball top off around 92, while seeing the radar gun pop in the 88-90 range more often than not. Without watching his starts (past and present) a little more closely, I couldn't say if/what the mechanical differences are, though I'm far from certain that mechanics are the only things affecting his major dropoff in velocity. There are countless things that could be wrong here.
- It could be an arm injury that he's been disguising the past couple of years.
- It could be that he's tried so hard to work on his command that he's simply lost the ability to propel a ball quite as hard as he once did.
- He could have to change his arm slot.
- Finally, there's that old tried and true possibility of the past few years. Cabrera started to lose velocity on his fastball (subsequently watching his strikeout rate drop off significantly) within a year of when performance enhancing drug testing went league-wide. (I'm not speculating... just sayin')
Whatever the reason is for Cabrera's dropoff in velocity, the fact of the matter is that it's happenned. While the dropoff in velocity will obviously have an effect on his strikeout totals, it will also affect his batting average against. In Cabrera's first three seasons, when the velocity was all there, he maintained batting averages against of .259 (2004), .235 (2005), and .241 (2006). As his velocity started to go, Cabrera watched his BAA balloon to .265 in 2007 and .286 last season. It was .269 entering play tonight, when he allowed 8 hits in 4.2 innings.
His strikeout rate has taken a similar turn, in recent years. It went up in each of his first three seasons (his rookie showing was poor, but was followed by 8.8 K:9 in 2005 and 9.5 in 2006). He lost 2.2 K:9 in 2007, dropping from 9.5 the previous season to 7.3. That was followed by an attrocious (seriously... lower than 46-year-old finesse lefty Jamie Moyer's) 4.8 strikeouts per nine innings pitched in 2008. Following Monday's outing, Cabrera's strikeout rate in 2009 is 3.4.
As if the much maligned defense needs any more of a kick in the butt, Cabrera has allowed thirteen unearned runs in six starts. Seriously... that's more than two unearned runs per start. As this post is about Cabrera (not the defense), I'm not going to harp on this any more than to say that the continued lack of fundamentals are clearly showing up in the box scores.
Moving along, we'll take a look at the biggest issue. It's one that has drastically affected not only Cabrera, but the entire bullpen (you can throw Scott Olsen under the bus here as well if you'd like). He's either incapable of throwing strikes, or he lacks the confidence to do so consistently.
Cabrera has always operated with high walk totals, going back beyond his Baltimore days to his time in the minors. Cabrera's lifetime BB:9 rate in the minor leagues was 5.19. In Baltimore, his BB:9 rate was 5.11 from 2004-2008. With the Nationals so far this season, he's walked 7.35 batters per nine innings.
The fact that Cabrera had one huge strength early in his career was worth taking a gamble on. I don't begrudge the signing at all, as (by baseball contract standards) it was a fairly minimal investment by the team. They took him on as a low-to-medium risk, high reward option. The simple fact of the matter at this point, though, is that you've given him 20% of the season to show why you had the faith to take the chance on him. There's not a single area (the velocity's not back... his walk rate's even worse than it was in Baltimore.... he hasn't come up with another pitch to help him keep hitters off balance, etc.) that he was worth that minimal risk. In fact, he's actually regressed across the board.
Once you've seen that the risk isn't going to pan out, it's time to cut your losses. At this point, he's on a contract that's edible enough so that he's doing nothing but blocking guys who could play a part in this team's future that are ready. It's time for Balester... or Stammen... or Clippard... or anyone who actually figures to have a future with the organization to take his place.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
You beat me to the punch!
I was thinking about writing something like this about an hour ago but then I had to take care of a couple things and I didn’t get around to posting it. You are absolutely right. The Nats need to cut their losses and release Cabrera.
I hadn’t thought of the steroids possibility but I don’t think that’s the problem. He doesn’t appear to have the mentality to be a big-league pitcher. He has no confidence at all in his stuff. He throws change-ups and sliders way too much. He has very little control over his breaking pitches. That’s why he throws so many wild pitches. The catchers have no chance to block all of those 55-foot curveballs.
Even worse, he doesn’t appear to have the slightest idea about how to approach a line-up and how to pitch in particular situations. Both Rob Dibble and Bob Carpenter have mentioned this over and over. Cabrera doesn’t appear to know who’s on base, who is on deck, whether the base runners have speed and so on. They accurately call Cabrera a thrower, not a pitcher. It’s pretty sad, considering that he has 6 years of major league experience. You might expect the “deer in the headlights” look from a green rookie but from a 6-year veteran? Wow. That says it all.
There’s not much hope for turning him around. It’s not like this is a short-term slump. He needs to learn how to pitch as though he were a Little Leaguer. He might be able to do that in the minors or in some independent baseball league. He’s certainly not going to learn at the major league level and the Nats shouldn’t have to wait around for him to figure it out. He’s not going to do it.
I remember when the Nats released John Patterson last year. Bowden said that it wouldn’t be fair to the rest of the team, to put a pitcher out there every 5 days who would have an ERA around 7.00 or 8.00. Well, we have that exact situation here. His ERA isn’t 7.00 yet but you do have to count all of those unearned runs. He is partly responsible for those errors because he lulls his teammates to sleep. It’s hard to keep your edge in the field if the pitcher is walking every other batter and/or throwing wild pitches, IN EVERY SINGLE GAME. You know that they are thinking, “Here we go again.” Then they sit out there in the field just watching the balls and wild pitches and there’s not a thing any of them can do about it. That’s why Cabrera attracts so many errors when he pitches. It’s not a coincidence.
As for his replacement, Balester doesn’t seem to be ready. What about Jason Bergman? He had a 0.00 ERA this spring as a reliever. He’s been a starter in the past. I know he gets very inconsistent, going on hot streaks and then very cold streaks, but I don’t think he is as clueless as Cabrera is. But no matter who the replacement is, the bottom line is that Cabrera does need to be taken out of the starting rotation. It’s completely unfair to the rest of the team at this point. The offense is great and Ryan Zimmerman could be having a historic season. It’s a shame to waste all of that every 5th day because we have a starting pitcher who doesn’t have the slightest clue about how to be a true major league pitcher.
by Potomac Fan on May 12, 2009 1:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A question of mental make-up?
For all I’ve heard that Olsen has a tendency to get rattled, it seems that DC has that problem a bit worse. We have seen him bear down and stay close in some games, in spite of errors, hits, and walks. However, last night is a far more disturbing example: he struggles, gets burned by a misplay behind him, and then goes to pieces. Compare this to Double-N’s last start against the Dodgers, where he got absolutely shelled in the first, but came right back and threw five scoreless to keep the team in it. DC seems to have lost whatever sort of self-confidence or mental edge you need to succeed as a major-league pitcher.
"It's pretty much all garbage time right now." --ROSCOEtheNATSfan
by Doghouse on May 12, 2009 10:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cabrera gone by Saturday 7:05...
Is my hope. I have tix for that night and was hoping for the debut of Stammen or anybody that can through a few strikes.
by Flippin1 on May 12, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It takes more than 20 days (starts) to build new habits.
I do not think he and Randy St clair have had enough time quite yet. It is not like we have anyone better. Go look at Battlestars minor league numbers. He is sucking badly. The best option at AAA is Mike O’conner, who has been lights out, but he is nothing more than a #4 the majors at best. I like him and would cheer louder than most if he started. But he is not young at all.
So if we are convinced O’Conner is the answer for a few years then lets go get him and cut Cabrera, otherwise lets give the experiment more than a half dozen starts to work.
"What you know is often the enemy of what you can learn" Bill James
by PhDBrian on May 12, 2009 2:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stammen and Martin
I agree on Ballester but not O’Connor. Granted it’s a small sample, but two guys look like they may be ready for at least a cup of coffee (and to give me something to look forward) and one is not O’Connor:
JD Martin, 3-1, 2.88, 25.0 innings
Stammen, 4-1, 1.85, 34.0 innings
O’Connor, 1-2, 3.69, 14.2 innings
take a look at the stats:
http://syracuse.chiefs.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ibp&cid=552&stn=true&sid=t552
The clay on Cabrera has been fired, there is no hope.
by Flippin1 on May 12, 2009 3:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen to that.
It was something I wrtoe during the game yesterday that I thought it must seriously becoming to the end of the line. I think the stats, the overall vibe of the performances speak for themselves. The team must find it hard to get motivated when he pitches.
There is only so much lightning one can find in a bottle and Bowden had a real obsession with turing players around… it sometimes works – but more often than not it doesn’t. There is a reason consistent big league pitchers earn so much cash.
Agree that its time to bring up another kid or try something else (maybe Kip? – I wouldnt mind Oconner either). Anyone really who can hold over till Strasburg.
"Baseball is like church. Many attend; few understand."
by Mezza on May 12, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great analysis, thanks. i’m trying to pick back up my interest in the nats after checking out for more than a year (i’ve been in chicago). with the huge amount of roster turnover, articles like this one are a huge help.
by Natty Bumppo on May 12, 2009 11:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















