Washington Nationals: Orlando Hudson Or Bust?
Summing Up: The Nationals And Hudson Almost There...
The Washington Nationals' interest in free agent second baseman Orlando Hudson has been public knowledge for some time now, there was even that did he or didn't he take a physical thing last year, but this time around DC GM Mike Rizzo made clear his intention to add a middle infielder and in no time at all Hudson's name was on top of the list and on everyone's lips...Nats' center fielder and public spokesman Nyjer Morgan told MLB.com's Bill Ladson in an article entitled, "Morgan wants Hudson to join Nats", that he wanted Hudson to sign in DC. The Face of the Franchise© Ryan Zimmerman let it be known he'd welcome a fellow Gold Glover and Hudson himself told Mr. Ladson that hearing what Morgan and the Nationals said meant a lot and he felt, in his own words, that "The Nationals are heading in the right direction. With Willie Harris, Nyjer Morgan and my guy, Adam Dunn, who I'm close to -- it's all good." So...
On Friday afternoon at the Nationals' Hot Stove Luncheon, Adam Dunn, as recounted by MASNSports.com's Ben Goessling in an article entitled, "News from the Hot Stove Luncheon", told a crowd of season ticket holders that, "...he thinks the Nationals are former teammate Orlando Hudson's top choice," and considering that Dunn, as Mr. Goessling notes, "shares an agent with Hudson," it's easy to believe Dunn knows of what he speaks...Dunn's old friend, the former DC GM and current FOX and XM host Jim Bowden put his two cents in Saturday afternoon, (I know, I know, get over it, he's a "journalist" now), tweeting that he believed, "O- Hudson 9 m demand getting ready to drop, Nats in the lead -5m probably gets it done." Uh...Yeah, I'll translate that for you, "Orlando Hudson's $9 million dollar demand is getting ready to drop, the Nationals are in the lead, $5 million probably gets it done."
MLB.com's Bill Ladson's story on the Hot Stove Luncheon entitled, "Dunn: Hudson wants to sign with Nats", quoted a source who said Orlando Hudson, "...wants $9 million and the club is not willing to give him that kind of money. The Nationals are looking to pay around $3 million," and with good reason as they've cited (through the media) the $3.25 million dollar, one-year deal free agent infielder Juan Uribe signed with the Giants as the standard for an infielder this winter...not to mention that Hudson himself signed a one-year deal for $3.38 million last season with LA...and if Rizzo gives Hudson the same kind of incentives he had last season, which allowed him to earn close to $8 million dollars, we'll all promise to go to Nationals Park and consume as much as possible to pay for each incentive should Hudson reach those goals...Deal?
• The Nationals' alternative to Hudson, Orlando Cabrera, is being tied to the Reds by a writer who covers the Rockies, and the only other infield option the Washington Nationals have considered is Adam Kennedy, because the only other big name out there is Felipe Lopez...I don't think FLop's coming back to DC...SI.com's Jon Heyman was the last one to tweet his own opinion on the free agent infielder's destinations, and as of late Saturday night he says:
"...guessing where infielders land: hudson nats, cabrera reds, lopez cards."
Just sign already, Orlando.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
That's not gonna happen.
Looks like Cabrera is joining the Reds. So it might be Hudson or Bust. (sign Adam Kennedy)
Why not us? Why not now?
This is painful! Sign already.
"I love, love, love John Lackey." -- Graysnail.
by Mezza on Jan 31, 2010 5:38 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I don't understand the interest in Orlando Cabrera
I’m glad he signed with the Reds, because Hudson certainly seems better offensively. Hudson also seems to be a great clubhouse guy who wins Gold Gloves. I do understand that recent wins might have been on reputation, but I would rather see him at second base than Guzman.
Cabrera got $4M. Give Hudson his $5M, whether for one or two years, and let Desmond try to prove why he is the better choice at short while Danny Espinosa starts to climb up his back.
After Hudson is signed, get whichever free agent starting pitcher you think is the best still available, Mr. Rizzo.
+1/2St.
by Positively Half St. on Jan 31, 2010 7:12 AM EST reply actions
Well Hudson is not a glove glover anymore.. not even close if measured by UZR
but his bat is still quite good by secondbasemen standards, so I am fine getting him for $5 million, but I would rather not. $5 million is fair value, not a steal. Guzman will play no matter what because of his salary. If healthy all year, Guz should grade out as an average to better defensive secondbasemen with a well below average bat, but at SS he is a below average defensive SS with a roughly average to slightly above bat. So moving Guzman to second or keeping him at SS is essentially a wash (every player ever who went from SS to second got a little better defensively right away). Thus, in reality this is Desmond or Hudson because signing the Odog benches Desmond. Personally, I have little doubt that desmond is an average major league SS (all round) long term (probably not now) and that is a good player. Teams win the world series with average players in key spots all the time as long as their are several stars as well. Thus, it is kind of a waste of money to sign Odog when you have Desmond, because you are slowing desmonds chance to develop and Odog is maybe a single win improvement this season. So in my view, the $5miilion would be better spent elswhere than on that single win. But, I guess if we signed Hudson for a year it would not be the end of the world for Desmond as long as he started in AAA. I just pray its only a year. 3 years from now Odog will probably be much worse than desmond if desi is allowed to develope.
We are not a contender trying to find a single win that puts us over the top, but a team developing a core that wins down the road (we won 59 last season). We should be shooting for 70 wins this seaon, 80-83 in 2010 and 90-95 in 2012 (strategy 1). not 73 this season and 74 again in 2011 and 75 in 2012 which is how the Royals are run and that gets you nowhere. Strategy 1 comes from serious development of in house talent that can start for 5-7 years and get better as it ages. Talent drafted well below the first round as well as top talent such as desmond. Strategy 2 comes from wasting money signing big name guys on the decline such as Hudson (Guzman, Soriano, Marquis, D Young, etc), so you do not have the resources and playing time to develop your younger talent. Had we won 75-80 last season or we had no viable inhouse option, I would be all over Hudson. But didn’t so Husdon is a waste of money and playing time.
"What you know is often the enemy of what you can learn" Bill James

by 

























