Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: My First Fight: Diego Sanchez

Washington Nationals: Weekend Rumor Roundup.

• Yahoo!Sports.com's Jeff Passan, in an article entitled, "Teams not fighting over free agents", gives his best guess as to what sort of deals the top ten free agents remaining on the market this winter are expected to receive. In Mr. Passan's opinion, 21-year-old Cuban left-hander Aroldis Chapman's in line for a 5-year/$23 million dollar deal. Joel Piniero, 31, who's trying to turn an excellent contract year into a big deal, (but unfortunately does not come in a package with St. Louis' Pitching Coach Dave Duncan), is looking for 3-years/$27 million according to Mr. Passan's projections. If the Nationals want to give Ben Sheets a shot, Mr. Passan thinks he can be had for 1-year and $7 million, but the 31-year-old right-hander is coming off surgery to repair a torn flexor tendon in his elbow, and hasn't pitched in a Major League game since September 2008...

Star-divide

• MLB.com's Bill Ladson says that, "The Nationals are still looking to acquire another veteran starter," in an article entitled, "Nationals have higher hopes for 2010", to join the four pitchers Mr. Ladson predicts will make up the twenty-ten Nationals' rotation: John Lannan, Jason Marquis, Craig Stammen and Ross Detwiler. "Washington continues to have interest in right-hander John Smoltz," Mr. Ladson writes, "but he'd have to lower his price to get a deal done." Smoltz, who'll turn 43 in May, signed a 1-year/$5.5 million dollar incentive-laden deal with Boston last winter which could have earned him as much as $10 million, but he was released by the Red Sox after 8 starts and 40.0 IP in which he allowed 59 H, 37 ER, 9 walks and 8 HR's. St. Louis then signed the veteran right-hander, who was (1-3) with a 4.26 ERA in 7 starts and 38.0 IP for the Cardinals over which he walked 9 (2.1 BB/9) and struck out 40 (9.5 K/9). 

• Mr. Ladson also notes, in the same article, "Nationals have higher hopes for 2010", that Washington is still interested in signing Orlando Hudson to bolster the middle of their infield since the Nationals' brass is reportedly still split on Ian Desmond's ability to take over at short on a full-time basis. According to a Detroit Free Press (Freep.com) article entitled, "Are the Tigers targeting 2B Orlando Hudson", which is credited to the Free Press Staff, if the Nationals want the 32-year-old infielder, they'll have to compete with the Seattle Mariners, Minnesota Twins, New York Mets and the Detroit Tigers, who, "...are interested in having him replace Placido Polanco at second." If Washington were to sign Hudson, it would most likely mean Desmond would start the season at Triple-A Syracuse, and MLB.com's Mr. Ladson writes that the plan to move Cristian Guzman to second would be dropped to make room on the right side for the O-Dog...

?'s For the DC Faithful:

- Is Ian Desmond ready for the full-time spot? 

- The Nationals traded Ronnie Belliard to LA where he beat out Orlando Hudson for the 2B spot as the Dodgers charged to the postseason...So why sign Hudson when Belliard's still a free agent? Is Belliard's time in DC just done? Belli's bound to be a cheaper alternative...If Desmond's ready does it make more sense to try to bring Belliard back?

- 3-years/$23 million for Aroldis Chapman? Want to be talked out of Aroldis Chapman? Check out "Chuck's" article at Dugout Central.com entitled, "The Saga of Aroldis Chapman, Where and When Will It End". There's also a link in the comments section of this article to a report at Baseball-Intellect.com by Alex Eisenberg entitled, "Aroldis Chapman: Everything You Need To Know", that thoroughly examines the 21-year-old left-hander's delivery, pitch selection and potential arm slot issues... 

- Ben Sheets is a former 1st Round pick who could be had for less than the Nationals gave Jason Marquis, if you agree with Yahoo!Sports.com's Jeff Passan's opinion...Can the Nationals afford to invest their money in a pitcher recovering from injury or do they need more of a sure thing?

- Is there any way DC GM Mike Rizzo is going to give Joel Piniero $9 million a year over two or the three years the free agent pitcher wants? Is there any chance Smoltz gets a deal that could earn him $10M again? Is he worth $5.5 million-a-year at this point in his career? Does that sort of deal make sense for DC?

- What's Rizzo's next move?

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If Sheets signs, he has to have an innings clause. If the Nats are the only ones bidding, he’ll be stuck taking what we offer. What do you say…160 innings?

Or, just sign Livan for a year and let him eat innings like sandwiches.

by RoscoeNats on Jan 4, 2010 8:42 AM EST reply actions  

If the Nationals have $10-$15M to spend...

Like M. Boswell wrote, I can’t see spending it on a serious injury risk…but I’m no doctor…

Livan’s sensitive about his “conditioning”, so be respectful..and Chapman’s watching so try to be nice to the Cuban soft-toss legend…

That is all…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 10:07 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Risky Buisness

I think a high risk high reward guy (SHEETS) is better than Smoltz or Livan any day. Worst case he isnt back to his old ways and he is just like Scott Olsen. Best case he could be an great pitcher again. I still want CHAPMAN but dont see it happening. Please dont sign PINERO to a 3 year deal.

by rbolt on Jan 4, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The difference between Sheets and Olsen though....

…If he gets what Mr. Passan estimates is around $4.5 million though…on a team with a $60-$70M payroll to have a $7 million pitcher unavailable would be devastating…if healthy though, I agree, Sheets over Livan or Smoltz…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 1:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Glavine was reportedly ready to return...

And the Braves (amidst some controversy) cut him to make a space for Tommy Hanson…(some thought ATL did it to avoid a $1M payment I’d he made major league roster)…I heard his name a few times this season, but apparently no one took the chance…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 3:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I want Sheets!

I’ve been saying it since last year; pick up Sheets! Do it now RZO!!!

by tengoalyrunr30 on Jan 4, 2010 12:30 PM EST reply actions  

Even at $7M? It's risky IMO...

Marquis, Lannan, Sheets, Detwiler and Stammen/Martin/Balester/Strasburg…that’s clearly an improvement over last year…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 1:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Sheets with an innings clause or even a starts clause.

28 starts or 165 innings to get your 7 million.

Just look at the Yankees’ formula. The headline pitchers basically get a million dollars per win, so if we finally get an 11 game winner, it’ll be a bargain.

2010 is the year the Nats will have an 11 game winner (who is a starter).

by RoscoeNats on Jan 4, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

An innings clause or starts clause would be a good idea if Sheets were signed...

chances are the Nationals would save some money that way.

Of course, if it were up to me, I wouldn’t sign him. Having observed him during his time with Milwaukee, I have to wonder if he’ll ever truly be healthy.

"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"--The Brain

by brook on Jan 4, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Tim Dierkes thinks Chapman will go to the Blue Jays.

17. Aroldis Chapman – Blue Jays. So much for this being a Red Sox-Yankees battle. It makes sense for the Jays to continue stocking up on young arms by splurging on Chapman.

He also thinks the Nats will end up with Hudson.

13. Orlando Hudson – Nationals. I still like the Nats for Hudson, partially because unlike the Mets and Mariners, they wouldn’t have to move an incumbent second baseman to make room.

by John Quinn on Jan 4, 2010 2:00 PM EST reply actions  

There was talk this weekend about teams that were interested calling Chapman in for private sessions...

…and there was no mention of the Nationals so far…unless secret ninja Rizzo is at it again…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 2:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Where do you stand on Orlando Hudson, Mr. Quinn?

I don’t like the idea that Guzman would go back to short…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Jan 4, 2010 2:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If the Nats get Hudson, I think they try to teach Guzman how to scoop balls in the dirt in the late innings for for Donkey.

Unless Desmond is a total bust, I think Guzman could end up as a sub or a platoon (unless O-Hudson is a switch hitter).

by RoscoeNats on Jan 4, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure-fire Players

YES!!!! The Nationals need to sign sure-fire premier players (3) if they want to get to the next level, which isn’t playoff level BTW. The fact that we are signing “yesterday’s news” tells me this organization is not even serious about placing hinies in the seats, yet alone making a run at a pennant. Shades of a neighbor’ing owner’s strategy . . . hmmmmm?

Chemistry is key, and we don;t have it. I’m not seeing the leadership, pitching or management to instills the thoughts that “we are improving”. Too may young and wild arms, too many first pitch balls and a horrible defense spells LOSERS. The young guys should be in the minors (even A Ball for some) and the vets are too old and not contributing much or injury-prone (goodbye Austin!). Zim must roll his eyes every game.

by The Shilverback on Jan 5, 2010 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation's blog about the Washington Nationals. Federalbaseball.com Trying To Make Every Fan A Nationals' Fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Federal Baseball Singers?

Recent FanPosts

Meh_small
Stringing together paragraphs on the Lannan dilemma
Small
A Fan's Take of the Offense
Img_0257_small
Getting set for the season some questions from a new fan..
Lombardozzi_small
An interest in a NL only auction/keeper fantasy league?
Screen_shot_2010-06-09_at_11
What was wrong with Jayson Werth?
Small
Mr Jackson goes to Washington
Small
Potential CF trade targets
Coverphoenix_small
Stupidly Early Projections for 2012 Playoffs
Stan_frown_small
19 Year Olds Stink

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium


Ministry of Peace

Rizzo__kasten_and_chigliak_small Patrick Reddington

Ministry of Truth: Records Department (Editor)

Ws1_small Winston Smith

Ministry of Plenty

Teddy_clip_small Doghouse

Banner_small Dave at District Sports Page

Youppi_040618_mon_a_small bluelineswinger