Nyjer Morgan - The Plush Effect
We all know how much fun it was to watch Tony Plush on the field last year. He turned centerfield, which had been an accident waiting to happen, into a team strength. (Check out this catch against the Brewers). We also saw the impact he made on the bases, but is there a way to quantify it? The Nats were slow and uninspiring on the bases before Nyjer Morgan arrived. How much did the Plush effect add to the Nats in 2009?
Most people use stolen bases or stolen base percentage as a formula for measuring base running. A better method is called Running Bases Produced, or RBP. RBP is basically a total of all of the bases a runner produces on his own. It includes stolen bases, bases taken through defensive indifference, and a value called Bases Gained (BG). You can think of Bases Gained as the number of extra bases a runner advances over an "average" runner. As an example, when runner is on first, and the batter hits a single, most runners advance to second and stop (insert Nats/Manny Acta snarky comment here). If a runner advances to third from first on the single, the runner gets 1 Bases Gained.
Nyjer Morgan played 49 games for the Nats last year (30%). His RBP while a Nat was 27. What does that mean? To find out, we can compute the all of the MLB Bases Produced (BP) in 2009, and see where Morgan and the Nats rank.
BP is the sum of Batting Bases Produced (BBP), Running Bases Produced (RBP), and Team Bases Produced (TBP).
BBP is the total number of bases a batter achieves with the bat in his hand. A single/walk is 1 BBP, a double 2 BBP, and so on.
As we discussed, RBP is the extra bases a runner advances on his own, above an average runner.
TBP is the number of bases a runner advances due to the batter's actions. So, when a runner on first moves to 2nd on a walk or a single, he gets 1 TBP, etc. With that in mind, here are the Bases Produced (BP) for each team in 2009.
You can see the Nats were in the middle of the pack in bases produced (BP), but that was almost entirely due to the actions of the batter. The Nats were absolutely dismal in Running Bases Produced. They were well below the league average 127 RBP, and had less than half the RBP of the Tampa Bay Rays. Here is where T Plush comes in.
Remember, Nyjer Morgan played 49 games for the Nats last year and had a RBP of 27. That is nearly 28% of the Nats entire 2009 RBP of 97. Looking at his ratio of RPB/game played, he has the potential for an extra base every other game! Even if his performance falls off to 50% of his 2009 Nats numbers, the Nats will get an extra 15-20 bases with the Plush Effect, which would get the Nats back closer to the league average. This does not even take into account two other important factors. One - Nyjer Morgan on the bases is a distraction to the pitcher. Two - the defense has to cheat out of position to defend him on a steal.
Looking at Morgan's RBP in DC, you have to wonder why the Pirates fans were so down on him. I went back and computed his RBP during his days as a Pirate. In 157 career games with the Pirates, Morgan only had 37 RBP. We'll attribute the difference to good coaching and an aggressive environment in DC. RBP is actually one stat that is greatly impacted by a manager's style. Jim Riggleman has done an excellent job in this area. (Watch this video of Morgan stealing 2nd and 3rd against the Cubs to see good aggressive base running).
One more piece of good news - Adam Kennedy had 26 RBP in 2009. Ronnie Belliard and Anderson Hernandez had a combined RBP of 10.
With Morgan and Kennedy on the bases, it could be a fun year.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cool! And I love the phrase "The Plush Effect"!
Maybe I’ve misunderstood what you said but I do have a question about the statement
“This does not even take into account two other important factors. One – Nyjer Morgan on the bases is a distraction to the pitcher. Two – the defense has to cheat out of position to defend him on a steal.”
Don’t those two factors in fact take into account his total bases in that when he is batting the defense has to defend a bunt which increases his odds of getting a hit and because when on base he is a distraction while to both the pitcher and fielders (unlike say when an Adam Dunn is on base) which increases the odds that batter will get a hit, both of which add to his total bases.
2009
Nats fan to usher: "Hey isn’t it a bit early for the Nationals to erect a statue of Manny Acta?"
Usher: "Uh sir, that’s not a statue, that actually is Manny Acta."
Nice, but...
You still have to subtract out some of those bases based on the times caught stealing. And a caught stealing is hurts more than an extra base helps, cause you lose a base runner and make an out.
Exactly!
Does RBP correct for “extra” outs? Is there a way to subtract out the CS to create a “normalized” measure? (As I recall, T.Plush was close to break-even on steal success for a neutral win environment, although counting the non-steal extra bases (“BG”) is more inclusive. Does getting thrown out trying to stretch a hit always get scored as a CS? What about getting thrown out going first-to-third on a single?)
The “distraction to the pitcher” thing is kind of a mixed bag, too. Another tidbit from the stat-heads in The Book is that a “disruptive” baserunner distracts the batter more than the pitcher. (Summary of a long chapter on baserunning: fast guys who steal all the time mess up the batter more than the pitcher, but fast guys who only steal occasionally mess up the pitcher more than the batter… go figure! Taking strikes to “protect” the baserunner can hurt your wOBA…)
But, my petty carping aside, great stuff! I hadn’t heard of this baserunning metric before.
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
You'll NEVER convince me that Rickey Henderson didn't distract the pitchers big time!
I used to watch them meltdown with Rickey on base because he knew how to get into their heads. But, perhaps, his teams’ batters weren’t easily distracted and also knew he was really smart about trying to steal a base.
OTH, I guess if a guy’s unproven as a good base stealer, he could disrupt the batter’s concentration more than a savvy pitcher’s.
I hope Nyjer turns into the next Rickey.
I can compute RBP attempts and %
I’ve got a busy weekend so I might not get to it until Monday or Tuesday. I’ll post it on my NatsStats blog then.
nyjer morgan
When the Gnats didn’t fire the woeful Acta..their inept poster boy of hopelessness.. by April 30th…i went on a mission ….“100 or bust.”……even thought they were going to flirt with the Mets all time losing record for awhile…..
But Ratzo fleeced Quitsburgh out of Morgan and his hustle and speed kills…woke up the rest of the team out of their season long Acta coma……and they actually went on a post all star run…the only one interim Riggleman was a part of until the end of the season when they took advantage of the NYM and ATL having checked out for the year.
Nyjer was the man..he was scary….don’t think he ever got thrown out stealing…. and when he did..the replay showed, most of the time, the umpire blew the call..
But #1 got hurt against the Cubs and it left Riggleman to manage the same ol Acta boys without his catalyst…..and surprise surprise…. the team went right back into their comatose ways—- going 7-21—- until the two end of Sept/Oct series mentioned above.
Morgan is definitely a player i am looking forward to watching….can’t say the same thing about “Retread Riggleman”…
+1
At last, some common ground!
2009
Nats fan to usher: "Hey isn’t it a bit early for the Nationals to erect a statue of Manny Acta?"
Usher: "Uh sir, that’s not a statue, that actually is Manny Acta."
except for the Riggleman comment
Riggleman!
2009
Nats fan to usher: "Hey isn’t it a bit early for the Nationals to erect a statue of Manny Acta?"
Usher: "Uh sir, that’s not a statue, that actually is Manny Acta."
BTW Mamba
If you ever want to freshen up your material, you might consider “GNATS RETREAD MANAGER WRIGGLEMAN!!!”
Just a thought…
2009
Nats fan to usher: "Hey isn’t it a bit early for the Nationals to erect a statue of Manny Acta?"
Usher: "Uh sir, that’s not a statue, that actually is Manny Acta."
Oooh, "Wriggleman," nice.
I’m surprised we haven’t seen that before. Okay, we probably have and I’ve just forgotten.
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
Even if Morgan's bat returns to it's pittsburg production
He is a valuable asset for his glove and really fun to watch!!!!
"What you know is often the enemy of what you can learn" Bill James

by 



















