Washington Nationals' Skipper Jim Riggleman On Ian Desmond.
One of the topics that consistently comes up when I ask for questions for the Nats' Skipper Jim Riggleman from Federal Baseball.com readers is what Ian Desmond's going to have to do to get himself out of the bottom of the Nationals' batting order (7th and 8th) where he's hit in 14 of 29 starts so far this season, so I asked Mr. Riggleman this morning in light of the fact that the Nats' 24-year-old shortstop was once again in the 8-spot in the order with Adam Kennedy batting second where it seems a lot of people would like to see Desmond. Here's Mr. Riggleman's response:
Federal Baseball: "I was wondering what you're looking for from Ian Desmond before you're going to move him up in the order, or if you like him in the 8-spot?"
Jim Riggleman: "Well, you know it's a product really of who else is in the lineup that day. I don't have it on the top of my head, but he hasn't been in the 8-spot consistently, he's down there some days, but quite often he's been seventh, he's hit second...Really, Nyjer [Morgan's] up there at no.1, I like the way [Adam] Kennedy's brain works when he's in there hitting second. Guzman's done a good job hitting second, so it's kinda like I just don't have anywhere else to put him right now. So sometimes I hit him eighth, don't really want to hit [Roger] Bernadina eighth, I like to kind of go six and seven right/left with Pudge [Rodriguez] and then Bernadina there, so that puts Desmond eighth, but he's certainly not going to play his career out hitting eighth, he's gonna hit higher in the lineup, and he might end up being a second hitter, might end up being a third hitter or a sixth hitter, but right now that's where we need him to hit."
(ed. note - "For the record, Desmond's started 6 games batting second, 5 batting sixth and 7 each in the seventh and eighth spot in the order.")
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for getting that question in, Agent Reddington...
“I like the way [Adam] Kennedy’s brain works when he’s in there hitting second.”……
Hokay, Riggler…….good answers, though, and AK isn’t doing as bad as I imagined over the last 2-4 weeks…
"There's a *raccoon* roaming the concourse at Space Coast Stadium." -Strasburg's Debut
on the same token, i’ve been wondering about the argument that guzman doesnt like to bat anyplace else in the order. i think thats a pretty lame reason but then I check and hes got 29 hits and 9 rbis (batting desmond in, maybe) so i guess im being overly negative on the guz. its still hard to believe (especially with the benefit of hindsight) that he was considered to start over desmond
'Guzman's done a good job hitting second'
he cant possibly believe this….
Explain Why........
He is batting .293, and is a .272 career hitter. Most fans complain about his defense, his bunions, lack of defensive effort, etc….not his bat.
The bat's good, it's the patience...
He’s a career .307 OBP. Except for his great 2007-2008, Guz is generally good for an OPS+ of about 80 (his career avg), somewhat below league average. That’s been a bit higher with the Nats—thank LASIK for his 87 OPS+ in DC.
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
The other problem with Guzman...
…is that he seems to not be aware in how the situation should affect his at bat. Kennedy’s OPS is comparable to Guzman’s but there are situations where you want to take pitches to allow other hitters to see what a new pitcher is featuring or situations where a guy has been wild and you want to see whether he will continue to be wild.
One of the big Moneyball stats is pitches seen per at bat I believe. You get a bunch of guys in your lineup who take pitches like Willingham and like Dunn and you are going to consistently get starters out of the game in the 6th inning or so. It’s how we almost beat Jiminez when we faced the Rockies. Guzman’s at bats should not be taken in isolation. When he’s got a low OPS and he’s not making pitchers work at hard, he’s allowing the other team’s best pitchers to continue to torment other hitters in the lineup.
Uh...yeah...Let's gets that Calder Cup!!!!
i agree with you..
so were you serious aboout him leading off, or did I miss some sarcasm there?
Sarcasm missed.
I believe I am well known on FB as the leader of the anti-Guzman lobby.
Uh...yeah...Let's gets that Calder Cup!!!!
wait, seriously?
I take it all back, you clearly have your finger on the pulse of the baseball nuance.
Doggy, I know you are trying to be polite here, but the bat is not good…. Aside from the fact that patience is part of what makes a good hitter, the guy dosent even slug 400 for his career…
an 80 OPS+ is terrible…
the opening sentence
was for Sully, dont want you to get the wrong idea, soul.
Hit Guzman leadoff
He was great yesterday! I tell you, though, few realized the miracle that we witnessed in the first inning yesterday. Leadoff Guzman struck out on like 5 or 6 pitches without lifting the bat from his shoulders. Don’t know whether to be glad or sad about that.
The other good news about yesterday’s win is that it was with the B-team lineup. We were sitting Pudge, Desmond, and Morgan and still found a way to win. Gotta believe we’ll be fielding a more competitive lineup today.
Really a time for Livan to shine potentially getting a rare opportunity for a series win against the Fish.
Uh...yeah...Let's gets that Calder Cup!!!!
It may be a coincidence with how the off-days worked out, but...
…it seems like Riggs is going all-out to win the series today. ¡Viva Livan!
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
I might consider willie instead of bernia but this looks like 1st stringers all around. (Not expecting to see walker or bruney this afternoon)
by TJL on May 9, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






















