Washington Nationals: Will Adam Dunn And Cristian Guzman Be Back?
Adam Dunn's 17th HR of 2010 sailed over the center field wall last night in Nationals Park, giving the Washington Nationals a 4-1 lead in what ended up a 4-3 win over the Kansas City Royals. According to Nats Insider.com's Mark Zuckerman's Tweeted estimate (@markzuckerman), the HR bounced, "Off the wall behind the batter's eye. At least 440 feet," from home. It wasn't the longest HR that Dunn's hit this year, however. On May 15th in Colorado, Dunn hit a 471ft blast off Rockies' starter Jason Hammel which momentarily tied the game at 3-3 and earned Dunn a full set of Callaway Diablo Edge golf clubs. The Nats' slugger also partnered with Callaway to give a set of junior golf clubs away to the Jimmy Garvin Legacy Foundation (a non-profit organization based in Washington D.C.) The folks behind the promotion* reached out to Federal Baseball to let Nats fans know that Dunn's blasts are not only helping the Nats but also helping local charities as part of a program run by Callaway that, "...for the duration of the season is rewarding any professional baseball player who hits a homerun over 470 feet with a full set of Diablo Edge clubs." Only two players this year have done so, Dunn and Atlanta Braves' slugger Jason Heyward, who hit a 476ft blast on the first pitch of his Major League career. So Adam Dunn's HR's not only help the Nats, but potentially local charities...just another reason to keep him around...
• Dunn Extension And Cristian Guzman Trade Talk AFTER THE JUMP...
(ed. note - " * = They just reached out, not a paid ad, I just thought Dunn helping out local charities with his bat was worth a mention. SHAKE N BAKE!!")
Dunn contract status was discussed again yesterday in several articles including Washington Post writer Adam Kilgore's Nationals Journal post entitled, "Mike Rizzo on the trade deadline, Adam Dunn's contract extension", wherein the DC GM Mr. Rizzo was quoted stating that though Dunn could bring a decent return should the Nationals decide to trade their big middle-of-the-order bat, but, "As of now, the Nationals remain interested in signing Dunn,":
"'We're looking into it," Rizzo said. "We've been talking about it since spring training. We're looking at all things, every way to improve the club. We like where Adam is at offensively and defensively. He's a big part of the clubhouse. He's a big part of the middle of the lineup."
• LINK: Should the Nats resign Dunn? In case you somehow missed the spirited discussion last week, FB contributor bluelineswinger's post entitled, "To Sell Or Not To Sell" sparked a long in-depth discussion of Dunn's value and whether or not the Nats should commit to the 30-year-old first baseman.
• The Guzzzzzzz?
On Monday night on the MLB Network show MLB Tonight, hosts (and former Major Leaguers) Harold Reynolds and Sean Casey mentioned that the three-game series this week in DC between the Kansas City Royals and Washington Nationals was, "...of interest to scouts and general managers leading up the July 31 trade deadline," since both teams were going to be potential sellers at the trade deadline. (ed. note - "DC GM Mike Rizzo was quoted yesterday saying that the Nats could be "buyers and sellers" over the next month.") Mr. Casey, in particular, talked about Nats' SS Christian Guzman’s value to the Nationals, and why he might be an appealing target for playoff bound teams looking to add a veteran infielder:
Sean Casey: "You win up the middle. He can still play shortstop. He can flat out swing it. He can still steal bases. He can do so many things for you. I’d be surprised if the Nationals are out of it in a few weeks and he’s not shipped off somewhere else."
According to early estimates provided in a MLBTraderumors.com post by Tim Dierkes entitled, "Elias Rankings Update", Guzman would not qualify for Type A or B free agent status, so if the Nationals let him walk once his contract expires this fall, the Nats would receive no compensation in the form of draft picks. Should the Nationals trade Guzman to ensure some return? Is there any chance Washington brings Guzman back? I seriously doubt it, but he's obviously well-liked by the Nats? If you were DC GM Mike Rizzo what would you do?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I love Sean Casey
as someone who grew up a Reds fan.. but god no, if Guz has any value whatsoever get rid of him now.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Set Guz free......and TAWH , too.......
They deserve to play for someone else. No snark intended…
Don't Be A "Crow", Bryce... - P.R., Draft Day 2010
"...eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg"
by cat daddy3000 on Jun 23, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
The recommendation was to "DFA" Nieves
as in, just let him go. I don’t know what the team would do for a backup catcher at that point, but if he was seriously below “replacement level”, then one would think that he could easily be replaced, right?
(Perhaps “replacement level” for catchers needs refining, because the available catchers out there just plain stink).
Rob
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
—Connie Mack
We're stuck with Pretty Wil until Flores comes back.
Given that “until Flores comes back” could be never, we’re stuck with Pretty Wil. Unless you’re that big a believer in Jamie Burke down with the ’Cuse.
Cool Hand Lannan has carried the mail in anonymity for two years. He'll carry the mail for at least two more! Give the man some defense and he'll give you the world. MOAR GROUNDERZ! MOAR DOUBLE PLAYZ!
Gotta keep Dunn around.
There aren’t enough impact bats in the system that are ready for that phone call any time soon, and free agency won’t be too deep. If we think we’re ready to contend next year then there’s no point trading away 1/3rd of our home runs.
Guzman: trade him before he has a chance to swing at another first pitch.
+ 1 on Dunn stays...
+100 on the screen name!!!!
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jun 23, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, keep Dunn!
The team has enough holes already. Without him, there isn’t much power. Zimm might not see as many good pitches without Dunn hitting behind him.
-------------------------------------------------
"Save it. I'm goin' for a smoothie."
The Washington Nationals, the team of the 2010s!
That one surprised me.
He’ll land with the Braves lickety split quick and Bobby Cox must be happier than a pig in slop. Guess Hanley Ramirez is the adopted son of the owner.
Cool Hand Lannan has carried the mail in anonymity for two years. He'll carry the mail for at least two more! Give the man some defense and he'll give you the world. MOAR GROUNDERZ! MOAR DOUBLE PLAYZ!
Adam Dunn
Keep Dunn! He’s great for the team and the clubhouse, he loves DC & wants to stay here, he’s done everything the Nats have asked of him and I’m looking forward to the upper deck right field blast that results in the Nats painting one of those blue seats white. He’s our Frank Howard, fer cryin out loud. Rizzo, please, please think of the team and fan heart & not just the bottom line. Resign this dude!
I'm off the grid right now and have missed some discussions.
But if we can trade Dunn at this point, we have to consider trading Dunn. Our upper minors are awful. The Braves upper minors are great. This team gets better with young cost-controlled players, either 3 power arms in the style of San Fran and San Diego or with multiple impact young bats like the Phillies when they were growing with Howard, Utley, and Rollins.
We have Zim and non-cost controlled Dunn and Hammer.
1) Make a play for DeJesus or a competent RF bat for the next two years that’s affordable.
2) Let Bernadina and Nyjer duke it out for center.
3) Trade Dunn if you can get a major prospect that will MLB ready by 2012.
We’re in for a long rebuild if and only if we let Dunn walk for nothing but the draft picks. If we’re going to resign him, both sides need to resign him before the deadline. If he’s unsigned before the deadline and we haven’t traded him, we’re in a situation that I can’t really live with.
I’d prefer to trade him rather than sign him at the 3 years 40M that I think it’s going to take at a minimum to get the deal done.
I like Dunn and I hope I’m wrong, but I think that our focus needs to be on contending the day that Bryce Harper is brought to the majors (much like the Braves are contending on the day that Heyward was brought to the majors) and that kind of thinking means getting more young controllable pieces sooner rather than later. Otherwise it’s kind of meander at 75-83 wins and hope Rizzo drafts like a stud. I don’t want them to back up a truck of money for someone like Werth.
Cool Hand Lannan has carried the mail in anonymity for two years. He'll carry the mail for at least two more! Give the man some defense and he'll give you the world. MOAR GROUNDERZ! MOAR DOUBLE PLAYZ!
This team has a great chance of being very compitent next year
zimmerman, who is a great young arm, will be ready. wang will be ready and we will still have our 3-45… i really think all we need is one more compotent bat and we can contend. having a 1-2-3 of strasburg zimmerman, wang is not too shabby. Yea, our 4-5 starters will still be a toss up, but with the exception of maybe the yankees, so are everybody’s
I think dealing Dunn for a prospect at this point is bad… flat out.. he is a close second (or maybe a 1a) to zim as the best hitter in the lineup, and hes one of the best power hitters in the game. It seems to me that if this team contends it will happen with dunn, not without or inspite of him

by 



















