Wire Taps: Washington Nationals' Ian Desmond's Two-Spot Awakening.
The Federal Baseball readers wanted to know back in May why it was that Nats' Skipper Jim Riggleman had Ian Desmond, the Nationals' 24-year-old rookie infielder, batting down in the order more often than he appeared near the top. After first correctly pointing out that Desmond had hit in several spots in the order, (at the time Desmond had started 6 games batting second, 5 batting sixth and 7 each in the seventh and eighth spot), Mr. Riggleman acknowledged that in part, "... it's a product really of who else is in the lineup that day," with Adam Kennedy, Cristian Guzman and Nyjer Morgan then seeing a lot of time at the top of the order, but Riggleman also made it clear at the time that he understood Desmond was, "certainly not going to play his career out hitting eighth," and RIggleman speculated that in the future, the Expos' '04 3rd Round pick out of Sarasota, Florida would eventually, "...hit higher in the lineup, and he might end up being a second hitter."
William Yoder, who runs The Nats Blog.com (@TheNatsBlog) noted Saturday night on Twitter how Ian Desmond, who went 4 for 5 with 2 runs scored in the Nats' 8-1 win over Philadelphia, "...really is starting to get some confidence in his game isn't he? Really getting in a groove." I sent a quick response out while watching the game mentioning that to me it seemed, "Desmond's hitting cause it's not the steady diet of junk he got hitting 8th..." and about the same time Nats Insider.com's Mark Zuckerman (@MarkZuckerman) sent a tweet about Desmond out which noted, "Ian Desmond now hitting .347 when batting 2nd. As an 8-hitter: .254." Desmond was clearly drawing attention to himself with his success at the plate...and it's nice to talk about something other than his errors.
When I asked Ian Desmond in an interview earlier this season if his approach was any different when he hit eighth, second or anywhere else in the order, Desmond said, "No," for him, "It's the same. I just try to have a good solid at bat every time I get up there," but with Guzman traded to Texas, Desmond's seen more regular at bats in the two-spot, in 99 AB's, the first-year shortstop's put up a .364/.400/.556 line with 8 doubles, 3 HR's, 11 RBI's and 8 steals batting second and a .397/.446/.559 line since August 1st following Guzman's trade to the Rangers. In 24 games and 94 AB's hitting seventh, Desmond's posted a .289/.290/.433 line. In 39 games and 148 at bats hitting eighth, Desmond's hit for a .254 AVG with a .304 OBP and a .388 SLG.
MLB.com's Bill Ladson spoke to the Nats' Skipper about Desmond's success batting second in an article this weekend entitled, "Desmond fitting in at second slot in order", and the Nats' manager said that he didn't regret allowing Desmond to work his way up:
"Earlier in the year, to ask Desmond to come out of Spring Training as a rookie and produce like that, it would have been asking a lot. It's still a work in progress. We'll see what the future holds. Certainly, he looks more comfortable there."
Desmond looks better there and the numbers support it, reminds me of the DC GM Mike Rizzo saying how he certainly considered sabermetric/statistical analysis in his evaluation of the Nats' talent, but, as he told a group of internet writers after being named the full-time GM, "...I trust what I see more than what I read, but it's always nice when what I read corresponds to what I think I see." I think it's clear any way you look at it that Desmond's found his spot in the order.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've been noticing this all year too
I was struck by how much higher his batting average and OBP were in the no. 2 spot. Glad to see that he’s getting more time up in the order. I think he’s a good long-term fit as the no. 2 hitter. Good OBP. Some pop in the bat. Good speed on the bases. Can’t ask for much more than that.
-------------------------------------------------
"Save it. I'm goin' for a smoothie."
The Washington Nationals, the team of the 2010s!
well you could ask
for half as many errors. But even his defense has been better lately (he made about 5 terrific plays in Philadelphia) and, as you said, his average and OBP are awesome during the month of August (BA is .397, OBP is .427).
He’s just getting a lot more pitches to hit because of the guys behind him, and with a guy as aggressive as Desmond, all he needs is something over the plate and he’ll hack away.
His defense leaves alot to be desired, but he’s got the one thing that you can’t teach…range. Now if we could just get him to stop the ball and NOT throw it…it might be better for everyone.
yeah, range is the most important part of defense
He’s got the range and speed, now just how to handle the ball.
Needs moar dingerz.
Actually,
it’s range and top quality arm strength. I would never say his defense leaves a lot to be desired. He’s one of the better regular shortstops in the league defensively, IMO.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
agreed. the only thing Ian needs to work on is his decision-making skills, IMO
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Aug 23, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
How much is the spot, how much is experience?
He may be hitting better in the two-spot because he’s seeing better pitching and has Zim/Dunn behind him, or he may be hitting better because he’s had more time to adjust to major league pitching and get some confidence at the plate. Possibly a combination of both, I’d suppose. As always, we hope the error total comes down next with more experience—he has the range, but he needs to learn which balls to eat.
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
+1 Riggleman Agrees with you...as per Ladson's quotes it would seem...
…Also currently testing theory that Bernie can be an RBI guy. Rather he led off, but no Hammer hurts.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Aug 23, 2010 9:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions

by 



















