Wire Taps: Washington Nationals' Stan Kasten Still Believes, "Better Days Are Closer Than Most People Realize."
In a July 21st 2010 interview with ESPN 980's The Sports Fix's Kevin Sheehan and Thom Loverro, Nats' team President Stan Kasten said he would like to see first baseman Adam Dunn in the nation's capital with the Nationals, "...for a long time." "We think Adam can be a very big part, a middle-of-the-order bat on a very successful team, so that's what we're hoping." Mr. Kasten went on to say that he still believed that Dunn could be signed to a contract this season, and in explaining why Dunn might want to stay with Washington, he explained, "[Dunn] does love it here, but why shouldn't he? He can be, 'the big guy' in the most important city in the world."
The July 31st Non-Waiver Trade Deadline passed, the Waiver Deadline too. No trade happened, a claim was reportedly placed, but nothing came of it, but no contract was signed either. "Those things are tricky," Mr. Kasten said back in March, talking about contract negotiations in general. "They're not as simple or one dimesional as you might think from just reading about it. There are a lot of factors that go into it, including figuring out the puzzle that is 2011 and beyond."
In the same interview, Mr. Kasten spoke about what was described as the Nationals' "real rotation", which, at the time, included the Nats' '09 no.1 overall pick, Stephen Strasburg, who would subsequently suffer an elbow injury and is scheduled to have Tommy John surgery today. Mr. Kasten, however, also spoke of six other starters who figured in the Nats' future:
"...we're getting Jordan Zimmermann back, we're getting Ross Detwiler back, John Lannan will be coming back, Jason Marquis is coming back, Scott Olsen is coming back, Chien-Ming Wang is coming back. We're going to have a big time rotation out of that group of people..."
Four months earlier, in the weeks before the 2010 season had started, the Nats' team President appeared on Sirius/XM's MLB Network Radio's Power Alley with hosts Jim Duquette and Seth Everett on a broadcast that took place live in Space Coast Stadium, the Washington Nationals' Spring home. In that interview as well, Mr. Kasten spoke about the team's desire to agree on a deal with their big middle-of-the-order bat, Adam Dunn, "He's a cleanup hitter, and they're not easy to get, there are not many guys who are going to give you 40 HR's and 100 walks and 100 RBI's," Mr. Kasten said, but, "We still have to make it work economically, you know how those things go. I don't feel any pressure to have to do something by Opening Day, I really don't think he does either, so if the fit is right, we'll get it done at the right time, I can't tell you when that will be or how much it will be, but he's a good fit here and we think he's a big part of our future."
Mr. Kasten spoke in the interview about the team that Washington had put together for the 2010 campaign, but also of what was right around the corner for the Nationals, what Mr. Kasten called in the interview the "next wave" of the Nationals' rotation:
"...as we put this team together, we're waiting for the next wave to get here, because no matter what we break camp with here in a couple weeks, we do know right around the corner is the next wave to add to our rotation with [Stephen] Strasburg coming and Jordan Zimmermann getting back and Ross Detwiler getting healthy and Chien-Ming Wang getting healthy, we think it's going to be an important transitional year for us."
Strasburg did arrive, and in the short time before his injury, the 22-year-old right-hander gave Nats fans a glimpse of one key aspect of the future Mr. Kasten spoke about. The plan for the Nats' future as far as Strasburg is concerned will be set back by a year, but the Nats' President, as quoted in a section of an article yesterday by ESPN.com's Jayson Stark entitled, "Is it time to push back trading deadline?" which was subtitled, "National reset" says Strasburg's injury, "...has not changed any of our strategies going forward." Mr. Stark starts the article by writing that the Nationals are, "...still planning for next year and beyond with the assumption that better days are closer than most people realize." Will Adam Dunn figure in that future? Mr. Stark writes that, "they'd still like to bring back Adam Dunn. But if Dunn leaves as a free agent and 'we don't have that, we have to replace it,' Kasten said." According to Mr. Stark, Mr. Kasten says the Nationals, "...plan to be "more aggressive than we've ever been" to upgrade their club," this winter.
Jordan Zimmermann's back in the rotation and just had what was arguably his best start as a National. Jason Marquis is not back to 100% following surgery to remove loose bodies from his elbow, but he's recently shown signs of life. Scott Olsen's a question mark for the future, but Ross Detwiler's not too far from returning from a rehab stint following surgery on his hip. Chien-Ming Wang's still working his way back. John Lannan's overcome some struggles and once again looks like he'll be a part of the Nats' rotation. With these arms, Livan Hernandez and Yunesky Maya, Garrett Mock, J.D. Martin, Luis Atilano, it would seem the starting rotation is not where the Nationals' will focus their attentions this winter.
Has Roger Bernadina earned his place in the Nats' 2011 outfield? Nyjer Morgan's a big question mark right now, and Justin Maxwell's 2010 campaign has to be considered a setback. Josh Wilingham will be in the mix in the OF given that he's full recovered from surgery on his left knee. Danny Espinosa may not make the team out of Spring Training, but the late look he's getting this September would lead one to believe his jump to the majors on a full-time basis isn't too far off and Adam Kennedy's a possibility as a stopgap or backup should Espinosa stick. Pudge Rodriguez is under contract for another year, and the future Hall of Fame backstop figures to be a mentor to Wilson Ramos, who steps into the role Jesus Flores was supposed to fill this season. So where exactly are the Nationals going to focus their offseason aggression? Right field? Center field, if you're one of those fans unconvinced that Bernadina or Nyjer Morgan can fill that position? First base, should the Nats' lose Dunn to free agency?
Is Mr. Kasten preparing Nats fans for a future without Adam Dunn when he entertains the possibility of Dunn departing in Mr. Stark's article? Where else is their room for the Nats to act aggresively? A free agent addition to the rotation makes little sense with the arms assembled and with Strasburg's immediate future in doubt but the expectation that he'll be back? What's step one as the Nats begin to prepare for 2011 and beyond?
73 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Step one: #signDUNN!!!
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
“We think Adam can be a very big part, a middle-of-the-order bat on a very successful team, so that’s what we’re hoping.”
I agree Stan…so what the heck is taking so long?? Sign Dunn!
These Kasten quotes are from a while back.
Has anyone seen any optimism on the sign Dunn front from inside the organization since Kilgore’s story that he thought Dunn was heading for free agency?
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
No.
I’ve heard no evidence of negotiations going on at all.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Which only means to me
that if there are negotiations going on, they’ve mutually agreed to keep this information secret. Speculation in the media does no good whatsoever.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
Agree with this.
I really wish Kilgore hadn’t gone public with that.
Kilgore has had three recent preventable booboos:
1) He made a mistake about how Strasburg’s injury affected service time.
2) He reached thinking a Nyjer benching was suspension related as opposed to just getting JMax a platoon favored start.
3) He started speculating about Dunn’s contract status without having but so much evidence. Maybe he wanted to see his name in Mlbtraderumors like Goessling’s?
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
This outfit has been a lot better than prior regimes at keeping negotiations on the DL
Which is a good reflection on them, IMNSHO.
THE RZO's FO is leak-proof...
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 12:47 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Addition to the rotation
A free agent addition to the rotation only makes sense if it is a top-tier starter. You can never have too many of those. This off-season, that means Cliff Lee.
Stark’s article says that Lee will “play in Siberia” if they pay the most money. He assumes that the Yankees will pay the most, but if the Nats are willing, they could make a better offer, just like they did with Teixeira.
Signing Dunn is an easy decision. I’m mystified that it hasn’t already happened.
Texas paid a king's ransom for a Cliff Lee rental.
Yes, it game them instant credibility. It also cost them a major prospect. So far, Lee has performed below expectations. If you gamble on Lee and lose, that’s the kind of move that could be like the Barry Zito debacle in San Fran. Personally, I’d pass. Let an organization with more financial latitude pick up the tab for Cliff Lee.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
+1
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
The Nationals have plenty of latitude
they just have to use it wisely. Signing a big-name pitcher would be useful, though I’m not sure Cliff Lee is the right guy. He might be.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
Lee is no Zito
If someone gives Lee a Zito contract, they’re insane and deserve what they get. I think Lee, given his age, is looking at something more in the range of 4-5 years. That lines up well with the Nats’ plans to be competitive starting in 2012. And they won’t have to give up prospects, though Lee could cost draft picks if Texas offers arbitration (which is all the more reason he won’t get a Zito contract).
Strasburg-Lee-Zimmermann sounds like the top 3 of a World Series contender. Strasburg-Zimmermann-Maya sounds like a big question mark.
or
they could rent a pitcher for a year only and the said pitcher plays well and likes the idea of playing with J Zimm, Stras, and Maya in the nation’s capitol then they can stay on for a descent price ?
by NewJerseyAveSE on Sep 3, 2010 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think there are many good pitchers that will sign one-year deals
(I’m looking at you, Livan!)
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
When he's talking about rental...
…I think he means rental via trade?
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
I believe this is a bit optimistic.
But hey, I hope you’re right.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Lee will certainly be offered arbitration and decline.
It will cost you picks, although the Nats pick might be protected.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Uh, Lee is better than Zito by a lot
Zito was really really good, but got A LOT of help from the fact that he pitched in a pitchers’ park with some of the best defensive infielders in the game at the time behind him in Mark Ellis and Eric Chavez.
Needs moar dingerz.
They have latitude...
…they just don’t have Phillies/Mets/Yankees/BoSox latitude and that’s the kind of latitude it’s going to take to get Cliff Lee I believe. Even the Dodgers are in worse financial straits. I think Lee ends up in New York. He’s probably comfortable with C.C. and the Bombers can see that starting pitching is their main weakness compared to the Rays.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Bombers
He could very well end up in New York; my point is that the Nats can and should make a competitive offer. I’m sure the Yankees will make a good offer, but they don’t want a Zito contract on their books either (especially considering they already have A-Rod’s possibly-worse-than-Zito deal to pay for).
Cliff Lee has not performed below expectations
He performed otherworldly awesome and historically good for a while, then the regression monster hit.
He’s still been excellent.
But, agree that huge contracts to pitchers in general are really, really bad.
Needs moar dingerz.
crazy thought....
could Willingham take over at 1B if Dunn doesn’t return …. maybe Morse ? Bothe seem to have some power ?
not that crazy, espcially if Hammer's knee reduced his capacity in the OF any further.
Willingham may be looking at a position change regardless.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Just not to RF, please...I saw that attempt...
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 12:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I was thinking ...
they rock out either a Bernadian, Morgan, Morse outfield or a Carl Crawford, Bernadina, Morse outfield and put willingham at 1B for range issues and his power hitting….
by NewJerseyAveSE on Sep 3, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
plus they can keep Willie over Nyjer if they need to b/c Willie can back up the entire infield....
by NewJerseyAveSE on Sep 3, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
That's what the General is for.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
Under no circumstances should Willie Harris be on this roster next year.
None whatsoever.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Didn't mean for that to come out so strong.
But it was so horrifying an idea to me that it got me emotional. Nieves and Harris must be gone next year if we’re trying to compete.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Well, Harris yes. Nieves must be in Syracuse.
"Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
-The Princess Bride
Crawford's name keeps coming up.
I don’t believe that one for a second.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
I'm with you on this one...
All the report on the Nats’ interest in Crawford said was the Nationals’ were interested and why wouldn’t they be. But I seriously doubt he ends up in DC, though I’d welcome it.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 12:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
FWIW
Crawford is not getting the buzz on Yankee pages that he might otherwise get. Their current lineup is pretty good without him, and their outfield is much younger than their infield (all the age is on the left side of the infield with Jeter and A-Rod; Cano and Texeira are going to be there for years). The thinking is that the Yankees will make the big move for Cliff Lee, who was pretty tight with Sabathia in Cleveland, and let the outfield of Gardner, Granderson and Swisher ride for a couple of years with Austin Kearns as the swing man.
All of which, from the Nats perspective, is to make Crawford an easier “get” than Cliff Lee. If they don’t re-sign Dunn, I’d go all-in for Crawford if I were the Nats.
I like how you think.
Lee seems to me to be La-La land. Crawford not as much. It would take an aggressive move. I think the comp with Crawford as a free agent is the Torii Hunter to the Angels move. Any thoughts from others on a comparable free agent signing and price for us getting Crawford?
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Crawford is younger and better than Hunter
I would be surprised if he signs with anyone for less than $18 million a year and/or fewer than five years.
I still haven't seen that poll up on Fangraphs yet.
5 year 90M for Crawford would be a better investment to me than 4 years 60M of Dunn. I think it’s more like 4 years 52M for Dunn and 5 years $100M for Crawford which makes it a tougher call, though.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Folks, you know I hate to be the purveyor of doom and gloom, but...
Carl Crawford and Cliff Lee are NOT going to sign with the Washington Nationals. Wishful thinking won’t get it Dunn, ahem, I mean done.
You all want the team to spend $15 million per year on an aging first baseman, then go and spend AT LEAST that much — EACH — on the most coveted batter and pitcher in the free agent market? C’mon, how about a dose of reality?
If the Nats re-sign Dunn and sign a 20 home run hitting RF to a two-year, $15 million total to keep the spot warm for Harper I think Nats fans should be happy.
Let’s take a look at last year’s “prized” free agent haul: washed up Pudge Rodriguez, no talent Brian Bruney, injury waiting to happen Jason Marquis, and Matt Capps, a closer coming off a 5.80 ERA.
The Nats hit the jackpot on Capps and played it perfectly. The others?
The Nats aren’t going to spend money on marquee (pun intended) free agents next year. They just aren’t. They know, especially with Strasburg out, that contending is a pipe dream. Save the money for the 2011-2012 off-season when the team will have a better idea about what parts are going to contribute to a winner.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 12:48 PM EDT reply actions
2012 isn't far away
They have to start planning for 2012 today. Of course they aren’t going to get everyone they want. Maybe they get nothing. But they certainly have the room on the payroll to make a competitive offer to one of the top free agents. I think it should be Lee, given the presumption that Harper will be a productive outfielder in 2013.
For clarification...
…I think that it’s a major stretch to sign both Dunn and Crawford. I think that the most likely scenario is for them to sign Dunn and stand pat, although the longer the Dunn thing stretches out the less optmistic I am that they sign Dunn.
If Dunn doesn’t sign, what do you think they are going to do? If Dunn doesn’t sign, I believe they need to make some other kind of splash that will help make the team more competitive next year so they can work on a 5-10 game win improvement with an aim of contending during the 2012-2013 window when a hopefully healthy Strasburg is back.
For me, Crawford is the first free agent you go after if Dunn chooses to let this drag out into free agency. We have a clearer need in the outfield in my opinion, and I’m content with moving Willingham to 1B next year as a transitional option until either a 1B prospect becomes credible or a free agent or trade acquisition comes up.
You and the rest of MLB probably think that Crawford is a pipe dream for a team like the Nats. If Dunn leaves, what would you have us do? Sit around and say woe is us and accept that The Plan was totally sabotaged by Strasburg’s injury? If they do that, fine. I encourage the season ticket holders and the individual game folks to head out to Hagerstown and Potomac and watch The Plan rather than the team that will be last.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
+1 well said....
I only brought crawford up in a situation where we do not sign Dunn….otherwise we have Willingam, Bernie, and Mosre rocking the OF and Morgan backing them up …..the General you are right should back up the IF
by NewJerseyAveSE on Sep 3, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Who is this 20HR hitting RF at 15M of which you speak?
I’m not that big a Morse fan, but I’d gamble on Morse in RF before I invested 30M at that position for next year’s Nats. I’d put 30M towards either a marquee free agent acquisition or additional starting pitching before I paid somebody a bunch of money to put Morse on the bench.
On this year’s acquisitions, I don’t have but so big a problem. Pudge was supposed to be an overpay for the first half of the year before he split some time with Flores based on performance. Pudge has looked bad in part because all of the backup options to Pudge have failed. Burke, Coste, and most importantly Flores have been bad.
I’ll continue to say that Marquis is good process, bad results and that there’s another year of baseball left to be played. Bruney and Capps were both gambles based on scouting that you can make for a last place team. One worked, one didn’t. Kudos to Rizzo for being smarter than his predecessor in getting enough credible backup bullpen options like Peralta and Slaten to help our bullpen remain competent. He didn’t have to go to some of the additional depth like Balester, Severino, Chuck James, Rafael Martin, and Josh Wilkie, but the performance of Balester suggests that if he had there were additional options that could have helped.
Bullpen management, drafting, and prospect management appear to three major areas of improvement under Rizzo. Jury is still out on trades of major league talent (Ramos was a prospect at the time) and free agency acquisitions.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
i meant $15 for two-years. a $7-$8 per year player.
Michael Morse is not an everyday player.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
My bad.
Didn’t read your original comment fully. You want us to go Rays and play the kids and absorb the losses if we don’t sign Dunn?
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
yes. i do.
i still think the team will be 10 games better next season regardless if Dunn is re-signed or not.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I think that's what we call a sunshower.
Where does the 10 games of improvement come from? I have some ideas, but I’m curious where you think it would be.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Sources I see right away:
J-Zimm recovering more.
Espi
Desi having less E’s
Storen improving in the pen.
"Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
-The Princess Bride
all of the above, with:
Ramos getting three starts a week.
Berndina’s .750 OPS in CF instead of Morgan’s .635.
Maya instead of rotating fifth starter of dread.
2007-2009 Jason Marquis insted of 2010 Jason Marquis.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm skeptical
Dunn is worth 3-4 wins; Strasburg was worth a couple of wins. I don’t see how the team is 15 games better, which is what it would take to improve the record by 10 games without those two.
I still don't know who that would be though.
Johnny Damon, maybe, but he’s aging. Who else is on the FA market. with that skillset.
Needs moar dingerz.
there are a few...
David DeJesus (not as much power, but good overall skills)
Jason Kubel
Brad Hawpe
Jonny Gomes
resurgent Pat Burrell (though he’s a butcher in the field)
i think any of these guys could be bought for a two-year deal averaging $7-8 million — or less in some cases — and give good production until Harper is ready.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Morgan get 8 games for Brawl, still appealing 7-game...
SI_JonHeyman: nyjer morgan getting well-deserved 8-game suspension after 3 incidents this week. that’s in addition to the 7 games hes appealing. #nats
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 12:59 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
And:
SI_JonHeyman: others suspended besides morgan: volstad 6 games, sanabia 5, gaby sanchez 3, slaten 3.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 1:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Sanabia??? what did he do?
Where’s Veras? and the managers? surely they have automatics since the benches were warned.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
so Sanabia was on the bottom of the pile. he was the one who Dunn tossed like a rag doll. he got 5 games for that? just 3 less that Morgan?
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
So... Volstad and Sanabia miss one start each? Big deal.
Only 3 for Sanchez after that dirty hit? Imma boo him every home game next season.
"And everybody lived happily ever after. Except the Phillies and the Mets. The End." --Sasskuash
Friend of Dukes and Desmond #3
BOO THAT MAN!!!
Riggleman suspended too. More shortly…
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Sep 3, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Riggleman had to get suspended after he allowed Slaten to throw at Sanchez.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Well, we have an opening for a scrappy CF who can steal bases.
Rosters have expanded. It’s time for: BOOMER WHITING!
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
You know,
I sure hope you get your wish. This would mean, however, that you’d have to forfeit your membership in the Miguel Batista fan club.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
The Miguel Batista Fan Club is an open organization that does not suffer from petty jealousy.
Now if WILKAMANIA is unleashed, the Miguel Batista Fan Club may have to close up shop because Wilkie would be competing with Batista for a roster spot or innings at some point.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Crawford would be an exception
Because he’s young enough that he could add to the core they are building for a competitor, and he brings postseason experience as well. I don’t think they really go after him unless Dunn walks (insert OBP joke), but if Dunn walks Crawford makes a lot of sense for this team even if 2011 is a tuneup for 2012 and 2013.
I think your assessment of the free agent signings is unnecessarily gloomy. Marquis’s history doesn’t show him to be injury prone, that may turn out to be an OK signing. Pudge has been better than “washed up” – he was signed to be a backup catcher and has exceeded backup catcher expectations in my book. Just imagine a season of Nieves and … and … someone else if you want to analyze Pudge. Bruney was a washout – he’s not a no talent, but he certainly didn’t show any while here. And Capps of course was the bonanza.
you make a much sunnier evaluation of last year's free agent signees than i do :-)
honestly, and let’s disregard the “future hall of fame attitude”, but what part of .267/.290.337 doesn’t spell washed up?
as for Marquis, a 5’11" pitcher with three straight 200-inning seasons was ripe for an arm injury. i wrote that when they signed him.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
by Dave at District Sports Page on Sep 3, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Pudge is still .5 WAR
Does he offer intangibles beyond Bobblehead night? Certainly, he’s still one of the better defensive catchers in the league. Clubhouse presence and work with the pitchers could be an asset as well.
Pudge is kind of a push for me. He’s an overpay, but that’s the kind of short term move you have to make if you want to be more competitive. Compared to Josh Bard/Wil Nieves he’s a major upgrade. I imagine that there were better options than Pudge available, but like the bullpen, having a credible defensive catcher behind the plate is very helpful for putting young starters in a position where they can succeed.
On a desperate search for Sunshine at Nats Park. In Rizzo and Ramos we trust.
Are you saying Marquis was injury-prone because he's comparatively short?
There’s been a lot of pitchers who have thrown a lot of innings despite not being 6’4". As a matter of fact, since 1920 there have been over 1000 200-inning seasons thrown by pitchers less than 6 feet.
Pedro Martinez: 5’11", hard thrower, pitched over 200 innings in 8 of 9 consecutive years.
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith
Ah. Well then by that logic,
we should look for guys who have started their careers getting injured every year, ‘cause, you know, they’re due for a healthy season, right?
Rob
"Ninety feet between home plate and first base may be the closest man has ever come to perfection." -- Red Smith

by 
























