Washington Nationals Sign Adam LaRoche To Two-Year/$16M Dollar Deal.
D.C. GM Mike Rizzo sent out a carefully worded statement when the Washington Nationals' former first baseman and big middle-of-the-order bat Adam Dunn signed a 4-year/$56 million dollar deal with the Chicago White Sox in early December, thanking Dunn for his contributions to, "...the Nationals and to the Washington, D.C. community," and wishing him well in Chicago. Reports (mostly from the Washington Post's Thomas Boswell) before and since Dunn officially parted ways with the Nats after two-years as the big bopper in the nation's capital have said that the Nationals' General Manager had a deal worked out that would have sent Dunn to Chicago in return for right-hander Edwin Jackson last July when the White Sox were desperate to add power at the Non-Waiver Trade Deadline, but a difference of opinion with then-team President Stan Kasten led to the 31-year-old 38-40 HR/100 RBI threat eventually leaving Washington when the team and its owners misjudged Dunn's intentions and the market for the slugger.
In an interview on Sirius/XM's MLB Network Radio show Power Alley with Jim Duquette and Kevin Kennedy earlier this winter, before Adam Dunn signed with Chicago, the Nats' General Manager was asked about the Nationals' interest in bringing the first baseman back, and he responded by explaining that he thought, and the Nats' as a team believed, "wholeheartedly that championship teams are built on pitching, defense, speed and athleticism," with pitching the most important aspect followed by strong defense, though, he said, "We certainly recognize that offense plays a big part in it also."
The Nationals were willing to let Dunn and his offense production go because they believed they needed a stronger defensive first baseman (though the merits of a strong defender at first have been argued often before and since it became a topic for Nats fans) and the Nats reportedly targeted former Tampa Bay Rays' first baseman Carlos Pena first, attempting to lure the Scott Boras' client to the nation's capital, but losing out to the Chicago Cubs, who signed the 32-year-old power bat for 1-year and $10 million dollars. Derrek Lee was next on the list, but he signed with the Baltimore Orioles last weekend. In Washington Post writer Thomas Boswell's latest article on the Nats' attempts to attract talent entitled, "After signing Jayson Werth, the Washington Nationals can't give their money away", Rizzo confirmed that the Nats had been interested in Lee, saying, "'We liked Lee a lot. I don't know why he went to Baltimore over us.'" "'But he did,'" Boswell added.
With Dunn and Pena in Chicago and Lee in Baltimore, the Nationals were left with one option if they wanted to add a legitimate (though as it's been pointed out repeatedly "league-average") first baseman to the roster, Adam LaRoche, the 31-year-old free agent left-handed bat and first baseman who played for the Arizona Diamonbacks in 2010 on a 1-year/$6 million dollar deal, compiling a .261/.320/.468 slash line, 37 doubles, 25 HR's and 100 RBI's with a +1.2 (Baseball-Reference.com) or +2.1 (Fangraphs.com) WAR value and a +4.8 UZR/150 at first where he made 11 errors last season and finished the year with a .991 fld%. Over the course of his seven-year career, the Atlanta Braves' year 2000 29th Round pick has averaged a .271/.339/.488 slash line with 40 doubles, 26 HR's and 93 RBI's per 162 games, with a .995 fld% and -2.6 UZR/150 as a first baseman.
The Nationals and LaRoche had expressed mutual interest in each other, at least according to unnamed "sources", who also said the free agent wanted a 3-year deal, but reports this past Friday said the Nats finally made a formal offer of a two-year deal which was correctly estimated to be worth about $8 to $9 million per year. Late this afternoon, MLB.com's Peter Gammons reported on Twitter (@pgammo) that fans in NatsTown should, "Look for Adam LaRoche @ Reagan Airport," when he comes to Washington, "for Thursday physical," before making his, "2 year deal w/ aggressive Nats," official. Washington Post writer Thomas Boswell told his colleague at the Post (Nats beat writer Adam Kilgore who reported it via Twitter (@AdamKilgoreWP) that LaRoche's deal was for 2-years/$16 million dollars and, "LaRoche has a mutual option for a third year worth $10m. #Nats can buy out for $1m. Makes $15m first 2 years."
LaRoche joins outfielder Jayson Werth, who signed a seven-year/$126M dollar deal with Washington, right-handed reliever Henry Rodriguez and outfield prospect Corey Brown, both acquired via trade, Matt Stairs, (signed as a FA) and Rick Ankiel (a FA as well) as the additions to the Nats' roster so far this winter which usher in what the D.C. GM has taken to calling Phase II of the Nationals' development as a franchise. How much better has the team gotten defensively with LaRoche at first, Werth in right and Wilson Ramos (acquired in late July) behind the plate splitting time with Pudge Rodriguez?
D.C. GM Mike Rizzo made the decision to stand firm on what the Nats were willing to give Adam Dunn, and allowed him to leave the nation's capital. Rizzo put his reputation on the line with the much-maligned overpay for Jayson Werth, and will now hear months of comparisons between Dunn and LaRoche...LaRoche might not have been the Nats' no.1 target as a replacement for Dunn, but Rizzo said he wasn't comfortable with the in-house options and he found the left-handed middle-of-the-order bat the Nats were missing...Does LaRoche's two-year deal signal that he's just a short-term solution? If he's not the Nats' future first baseman, who is? Rizzo has two years to find out.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OT, Beltre
Just saw the link to the Beltre deal. I hope we get a commission from Beltre’s agent on that deal. I can’t believe somebody would give Beltre 6 year/96M if our Werth deal didn’t show the potential for guys to get big money in their late 30s.
Maybe we should make a deal for Michael Young on a discount….
John Carlson: A real American hero taking names and settling scores.
widely regarded
as the best defensive 3b in baseball.
People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~Rogers Hornsby
Pettite!
The only question about the Beltre contract is its length. It is well known that Beltre produces best in contract years, and this long of a contract does not take good advantage of that phenomenon. It’s probably the only way he’s affordable though.
On Michael Young, if either half of our young middle infield crashes and burns this year, he’s definitely worth taking a look at. I’d expect there to be other options out there too, though.
close
11.18 UZR over 5 full seasons <— our Zimm
11.72 UZR over 12 full seasons <— Beltre
Beltre has always been known for his glove. It took him longer than Zimm for his bat to catch up.
All defensive stats are pretty flawed, I’ve seen them both play plenty and Beltre can’t touch Zim’s range.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Suffice it to say that
They’re both excellent, and the statistical differences are significantly less than the margin for error in the system :-)
I can't hate on Greinke, but Lee should be booed mercilessly during the Battle of the Beltways
I would have preferred one year of him to two years of LaRoche and it sounds like Rizzo would have as well. It’s not about winning for him because the Orioles have zero chance of competing in that division. It’s about the DH and the hitters ballpark to try to make bank on his next deal. I hope they trade him to Siberia before the deadline.
John Carlson: A real American hero taking names and settling scores.
i can hate on Greinke
May the way of the hero lead to the Triforce
by TJL on Jan 5, 2011 9:37 AM EST up reply actions
I still likes
Sure, eight million bucks per is preposterous, but what else is new? LaRoche is a good’un and he will help us, in more ways than one. Who cares about Lee? He’s a stiff and we’re better off.
"That'll be the day." - John Wayne
So sad we have to overpay everybody
Hope some of these kids can start giving us better leverage
John Carlson: A real American hero taking names and settling scores.
More winz and better farm system for any leverage
But at least Rizzo reeled in a real 1B until one develops in the minors.
Now I can stop checking obsessively every day! Whew.
"Baseball is a game played by the dexterous but only understood by the POIN-dexterous."
Professor Frink (from MoneyBart Episode )
by MissB on Jan 5, 2011 1:05 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agreed. I'm not giddy over this signing, but at least the guy is a 1B.
Man, is he getting overpaid.
Patiently waiting for "next year" since 1971.
by Princess Jazzy on Jan 5, 2011 1:55 AM EST up reply actions
More Relief than Joy
Some of these moves are like buying a lawn mower, not very exciting but most necessary. If Desmond can cut down on the errors then we could have a very sold infield. For a losing team maybe we’re not overpaying, but paying for losing.
Seriously....
At this point, checking mlbtr is a habit for me, and one that will continue until actual baseball is actually being played.
"I throw as hard as I can when I think I have to throw as hard as I can." - Walter Johnson
*Formerly known as Giant Torture
Is this really an overpay?
Pena got more and Lee got the same per year, I believe. Pena hit below the Mendoza line last year and Lee is coming off 3 years of decline and a wrist injury. I believe LaRoche is a better option and 8m is a fair price in this winter’s market.
by The Herndon Kid on Jan 5, 2011 6:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'm about on this frame of mind too. . .
Not overly excited about LaRoche, but not holding my nose either, and happy the Nats now have an everyday first baseman. Plus compared to the contract terms and numbers being thrown around prior, to see it’s only a 2 year, $16 mill agreement makes me breathe a little easier. I was really afraid it was going to be a 3 year deal for $27 mill or so
At this point
this signing is too predictable (inevitable, really) for me to get too excited. I hope he doesn’t get off to a slow start.
ive already pre-penciled it in the 4th inning of my scoresheets
riggler sure would go nuts in the AL, having to just stand there and watch baseball all game
May the way of the hero lead to the Triforce
by TJL on Jan 5, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions
I am lukewarm on this deal
According to the advanced defensive metrics LaRoche is better than Dunn, but is still a bad defender. Moreover, he can’t hit lefties much at all. But, he is a legit power hitter and he is not expensive.
I kind of wanted Morse to get a shot. Although the sample was tiny, Morse’s defensive numbers on first looked real good in short time there. He did slug over .500 last season when he played. But, he is a gamble.
in the end it is only 2 years and hopefully someone will come out of the minors by then.
Now letting the hammer leave signing Ankiel was dumb.
"What you know is often the enemy of what you can learn" Bill James
But would I be me if I was always happy lol
"What you know is often the enemy of what you can learn" Bill James
A bad defender?
Yes, Zuckerman quoted him as having a career negative UZR, but if you take out one uber-crappy year a few seasons ago he grades out positively. I’m willing to assume that the one outlier was the fluke and the the other seasons are a better indicator of his defensive skill.
How important defensive skill is for a first baseman, we shall see. But I do think a fair reading of the defensive stats show him to be an above average first baseman.
tend to agree on the defensive comparison
Dunn was not great in his first year at 1B while LaRoche has a career of being not great (not bad but not great) at 1B
May the way of the hero lead to the Triforce
by TJL on Jan 5, 2011 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
After his first three seasons he has a record of being good but not great
And I’ll take that. And he was great last season (5.2 UZR, according to Fangraphs). Even with some regression he still should be about a 2 UZR (averaging out LaRoche’s last four seasons) where Dunn was a -3.1.
.
According to the advanced defensive metrics LaRoche is better than Dunn, but is still a bad defender.
I don’t know about that. Fangraphs puts his UZR from last season at 5.2, which is nothing to shake a stick at. Ranks in the top 70 of all position players who had at least 100 innings last year. Dunn was not a first basemen at all.
Rizzo tried to make us right...
We’ll have to redeem ourselves in the next poll to uphold our rep as the “Nate Silver of Nationals-related polling”…
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 5, 2011 8:20 AM EST up reply actions
I failed that poll harder
i don’t entirely remember, but i think i voted for the hammer before he was traded.

by 




























