Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

2012 WAR Projection - 90 wins???

A lot has been written about the Nats' pursuit of Buehrle, Oswalt, Darvis, Cespedes, et al. Clearly they want to improve from 80 wins last year. From what I've read/observed in recent years, 88-90 wins would put them in contention for the playoffs. They have improved by 10 wins each of the last two years so it's pushing it to achieve that again. Obviously, the more wins you have, the harder it is to improve by 10.

Many will be very disappointed if they go into next year without a significant addition to the roster. I think we all would love to see a high OBP, strong fielding CF added. But, what if they do nothing and go into next year as currently built?

I pulled WAR values from Fangraphs. Here are the basic assumptions I made. I just listed the guys who played the most at each position for position players. Bench players contribute almost nothing to WAR and it doesn't take much to think they will have as good or better a bench. For starting pitchers, I listed the five with the most starts and then the likely 5 to do that next year. I also assumed the bullpen would repeat. They were good and added a number of wins last year so that's a significant assumption but I think a reasonable one. No one had a year that was a big outlier for them and everyone who contributed wins is returning. For next year's projected WAR, I used either Fangraph's projection or a slightly lower number than their career norms (this applied mostly to Zimm, Werth and LaRoche).

As you'll see in the table, I'm projecting they add 12 wins by standing pat. I know that won't happen. Some of the guys I'm projecting will get injured and their replacements will likely be lower than what I project. And some of these guys will fail to meet my projections. But, even accounting for a 50% overstatement, this team stands to improve by 8 wins without adding anyone. While I could have been more conservative, I also could have been rosier. I could have counted on WAR contribution from Harper (I don't expect much WAR from a 19 year old, that would be gravy), a new SP or a new CF.

The big improvement areas in my analysis are:

1. By LaRoche returning and Morse taking innings from Nix in LF, LaRoche's bat basically replaces Nix's.

2. Zimm and Werth return to close to their recent levels prior to '11.

3. Strasburg performs about as expected and Wang puts up a year close to his Sept performance.

That's not a pie in the sky list of assumptions. This team, as built could contend for the playoffs...there I said it.

Pos.

2011 Player

‘11 WAR

‘12 proj.

Diff v '11

2012 Adjustment/Explanation

c

Ramos

3.1

3.1

0

Repeats '11

1b

Morse

3.4

2.5

-0.9

back to LaRoche, assume his recent norms

2b

Espinosa

3.5

3.5

0

Repeats '11

ss

Desmond

1.4

1.4

0

Repeats '11

3b

Zimmerman

2.5

6

3.5

Returns to recent norms

lf

Nix

0.6

3.4

2.8

Morse at 2011 level

cf

Ankiel

1.4

1.4

0

Assume no improvement

rf

Werth

2.5

5

2.5

Returns to recent norms







SP






1

Hernandez

1.9

5

3.1

Strasburg @ Fangraphs projection

2

Zimmermann

3.4

3.4

0

Repeats '11

3

Lannan

1.3

1.3

0

Repeats '11

4

Marquis

1.6

2.8

1.2

Wang - James says FIP = 3.8 so WAR 2.8

5

Gorzelanny

0.7

0.7

0

Detwiler - assume same as Gorzy







Pen




0

Repeats '11





12.2

Total

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You're projecting 3.4 wins for LaRoche?

His highest ever was 2.5, and that was 6 years ago!

Rob

--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds

by RobBobS on Dec 16, 2011 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

No, he is projecting 2.5, which still seems high.

But LaRoche has achieve 2.0+ three times in eight seasons. So, it would be a better projection to between 1.2 and 2.5 if he’s back to career norm.

by chubias on Dec 16, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the task you have taken on is generally impossible.

There are too many players that have no real track record to judge them. Ramos, Espinosa, Morse, Wang, and Jzimm are all question marks. Will they repeat their success or repeat thier failures?

I think that you aren’t wrong to note that there are a number of reasons for hope that this team will be playing better in 2012, but I don’t think that you really say with any sincerity that you project the Nationals to do anything good or bad.

by chubias on Dec 16, 2011 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

I love the article.....

But I would guess that Espi and Dez will improve in 2012 from 2011 and not repeat? I think that is the projection? I leave all the quantitative stuff for you mathageeks…..I’m more of a qualitative thinker. Still, nice article though.

by sullyzz on Dec 16, 2011 8:50 PM EST reply actions  

impossible, of course

Thanks for the comments. and of course the task impossible. You can only get a general sense of what could happen.

As for LaRoche, he has put up a 2.5, a 2.3 and a 2.4 so I think a number above 2 is warranted but you are probably right that 2.5 is too high.

And certainly Espi and Dez might improve. And Ramos and Morse might regress or Werth might not revert to his norms or several of these guys could get hurt. The variables are infinite.

My real point is that with reasonable projections for the guys currently expected to play most of the innings, this team can reasonably hope to improve significantly next year, without any additions. I think that’s great and more or less unprecedented. I don’t believe they will improve by 12 runs as my table projects. But, I think it is likely they will win more than 80.

Sometime I’d like to look at consistency of WAR numbers. For example, after a few years at one level, is a guy more likely to put up a comparable number? Is there a certain age where it tends to drop off? Peak? Maybe another post.

by Avar on Dec 17, 2011 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

If you want to do that, I'd pick a random sampling of approximately 50 players and look for patterns.

"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane

by Jorgath on Dec 19, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation's blog about the Washington Nationals. Federalbaseball.com Trying To Make Every Fan A Nationals' Fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cat_coons_small
***Pick6!!!>>>'''PLAY NOW'''<<<Pick6!!!***
Bugs-bunny-baseball_small
New GuessEm Rankings (5/24)

Recent FanPosts

45859-188-008f_small
Why don't more players -- and teams -- do vision training?
Marion2_small
Odd Baseball Question
Joker460_1__small
Philly-Tears Milkshake Brings This Boy Back to The Yahd!
Small
No excuses... too many men left on base
Small
Speed Camera on I-395 in DC coming from VA
Small
Harper HR Poll
Photo-1_small
A few takes, and some queries, from a neophyte
Small
The Gathering Storm

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Ministry of Peace

Rizzo__kasten_and_chigliak_small Patrick Reddington

Ministry of Truth: Records Department (Editor)

Ws1_small Winston Smith

Ministry of Plenty

Teddy_clip_small Doghouse

Shadedlogo_small Dave at District Sports Page

Youppi_040618_mon_a_small bluelineswinger

Small d_c_guy

Adam_o_small jeff550

Imag0320_small SaratogaCountySports