Heard Any Good Prince Fielder, Washington Nationals Rumors Lately?
When the possibility of Prince Fielder coming to Washington was mentioned to Michael Morse in a late November interview on MLB Network Radio, the Nats' LF/1B was unable to contain his excitement at the idea of the soon-to-be-former Milwaukee Brewers' slugger joining the movement in the nation's capital even if it meant Morse would be out in left field instead of playing first where he played most of last season during his breakout year.
"Oh my gosh!," the 29-year-old Morse said, "Are you kidding me? I mean, I'll catch. I'll pitch. Whatever it is. If we can get our hands on Prince. That is huge. Especially in our division. And especially with the lineup we have. We have [Ryan] Zimmerman. We have [Jayson] Werth. We have a lot of power righties and to put him in there? He's a monster. He's a game changer at any time of the game." 2010 no.1 overall pick Bryce Harper joked on Twitter that after adding Gio Gonzalez all the Nats needed to do was add the 27-year-old Fielder. Gonzalez too tried to recruit Prince...
This afternoon an anonymous National told CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman, as Mr. Heyman wrote on Twitter (@JonHeymanCBS), that Washington was in the mix for the Milwaukee Brewers' '02 1st Round pick. "Spoke to a Washington Nationals player today about Prince," Mr. Heyman wrote, and the player told him, "'We're in the market. We're still shooting for him.'"
In a follow-up article entitled, "Nats player: We are "shooting for" Prince", the CBSSports.com baseball writer acknowledged that quoting an anonymous player might draw some skeptical reactions, writing, "People can scoff at the validity of a player as a source, but this player did not hesitate and sure seemed to know what he was talking about. But who can be sure?"
Mr. Heyman acknowledges the public statements by the Nats' GM Mike Rizzo too, (the general manager told MLB Network Radio host Mike Ferrin that the Nationals had, "... more or less decided that Adam [LaRoche] is going to be our first baseman, unless something extraordinary, out of the ordinary happened that's how we're going to go to Spring Training,") and notes that though Fielder reportedly traveled to several MLB cities around the country recently, it's unclear if Washington was one of them.
It's not just the anonymous National and Mr. Heyman who are hearing the chatter. ESPN.com's Buster Olney, in ranking the Nationals 9th overall among MLB defenses this morning in an article entitled, "The 10 best infields in Major League Baseball", writes that with talent like Ryan Zimmerman, Danny Espinosa, Morse, Ian Desmond and prospects like Anthony Rendon the Nats have a lot of talented options however they align them and could have to make room for a big addition since, "Some rival executives strongly believe that Washington will be the eventual landing place for Fielder."
FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal too reported yesterday that Fielder's agent Scott Boras, "... indicated that Fielder has met personally with several owners, though he declined to identify those owners or say how many such meetings have taken place." The reason for meeting with owners, the agent explained, was so that both his client and prospective investors could really get to know one another and the owners could see what a difference the first baseman could make on the field, in the clubhouse, at the box office and in terms of tv ratings/revenue.
Rizzo and the Nats, CBSSports.com's Mr. Heyman suggests, could be, "... downplaying their genuine interest in Fielder as a way not to get fans' hopes up," and, "... he wouldn't be the first GM to do that." Maybe the Nationals are being mentioned only because they're one of the teams that could afford the asking price, as Washington Post writer Thomas Boswell wrote yesterday might be the case, or because they've made big offers before (see: Mark Teixeira, Jayson Werth), but in spite of what the Nats keep saying publically, something has baseball writers, rival executives and apparently even one anonymous National convinced that Washington might actually be in the market for Prince Fielder.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
worth a chuckle from SI's 2012 forcast:
April 4: The Miami Marlins open their new ballpark. Halfway through the national anthem, new manager Ozzie Guillen gets ejected for arguing with the singer.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, uh, your opinion man
by TJL on Dec 29, 2011 5:04 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Another reason to sign Fielder
.412
.405
.415
That is Prince Fielders OBP over the past 3 years
MOAR SEVERINO!
Bad GMs overpay for past performance
The key stats aren’t what Fielder’s already done, but what he will do while under his next contract.
Regardless, by trading three of his top ten and four of his top 15 prospects, and decimated his MLB-ready starting pitching depth, Rizzo has committed to being competitive this season. This team glaringly needs a clean-up hitter for next year and the next few. If Fielder falls off a cliff at age 31-32, big deal, they’ll make up the money 10 times if the Nats have gone to playoffs a couple times in those five years.
Your voice of doom and gloom. Read more at natsnewsnetwork.blogspot.com
"Nobody’s got a monopoly on good writing, or the facts. If you can come up with one or the other or (ideally) both, you’re in the club." --Rob Neyer, Feb. 2, 2011
by Dave at District Sports Page on Dec 29, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This poll is a lot closer than I thought it would be
I don't have a very high opinion of southern California, in sports or in general
The poll asked whether one believes the rumors about the Nats' interest, not whether one believes that the team SHOULD be interested/sign Prince
The answers may be quite different :-)
One thing I've learned about online polls ....
… is that people often answer them based upon what they wanted the question to be, rather than what the question is.
The other thing I’ve learned is that readers tend to interpret the results much the same way.
:)
Unrelated note
The World Wide Leader has struck once again… After panning the Nats for their acquisition of Gio Gonzalez, ESPN is back to grovelling at all things Boston after the trade for Andrew Bailey. A power lefty goes to the NL from the AL, and we’re to believe that his stats were a fluke. Meanwhile, a closer goes from a pressure-less cavern (seriously, how many meaningful games did Bailey close recently?), to the vaunted AL East and it’s a slam dunk. This is why I read these blogs. Thank you Federalbaseball providing insight and endless amounts of useful baseball info without the predictable ESPN drivel!
ESPN is what it is
And they really will only cater to big market teams or the last WS winner. That limits you to Boston, New York, Philly, San Fran, LA, Dallas, Chicago and St. Louis.
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
In fairness, the Sox gave up a redundant outfielder who had a hot few months.
I think the issue was less with Gio than with the perceived cost. I for one think the Nats did fine since Millone and Norris probably won’t pan out as major leaguers and Cole is too far away to help.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents. As are we all."
---Malachi Constant
by The Herndon Kid on Dec 29, 2011 8:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Could the reason that Rizzo seems content to have Werth in CF be because...
he has to have four spots open for Fielder, Werth, Morse and Harper should Harper make it to the majors this year?
(And Fielder is signed, of course)
This has to play into his thinking somewhat if not just to have options, right?
by jimmylauderdale on Dec 29, 2011 6:02 PM EST reply actions
Or
There isn’t a good deal on a CF out there and with no where to put LaRoche but 1st we are left with our best on roster option at CF in Werth.
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
I cannot help but think Rizzo could get a serviceable CF for Storen and change if he really wanted to.
I could be completely wrong, though.
by jimmylauderdale on Dec 29, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Matt Capps,
Transformed into Wilson Ramos. Although I’m pretty content with Storen shutting the door. The Nats pen is not as far behind the Braves as Atlanta homers would have you believe.
Yep.
And while the Lerners are throwing money around they can just sign Madson to replace Storen after he is dealt for a CF!
pipe dreams…
by jimmylauderdale on Dec 29, 2011 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
I don't fully understand the Madson situation
Is he asking for a crazy contract, is he injured, is he clubhouse cancer? The only guy who more is inexplicably unsigned IS Prince.
I think the market for closers simply dried up and he went unsigned.
He isn’t likely at all to get what he wants now. It is funny that Philly gave more money to an inferior pitcher in Papelbon, though.
by jimmylauderdale on Dec 29, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think it is the clubhouse thing as I seem to recall Werth saying any team would want him.
He even said he talked to Madson about going to DC.
by jimmylauderdale on Dec 29, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions
stop trading our players!!1
"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." Lance Berkman......LBIMH...
by cat daddy3000 on Dec 29, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions
Undecided
I get what Fielder brings and I can agree if it is a short contract. He isn’t the greatest first baseman but is better than Dunn!! His offense would protect Zimm and Morse. Morse is no golden glover in LF but he does alright. Again not Dunn or Willingham out there. So if you say a line up of Desi, Harper, Zimm, Fielder, Morse, Werth, Espi, Ramos gives incredible balance. Let Harper hit second and use his exhuberance to make things happen. Or switch him and Espi and have Johnson work on Espi being an on base guys and not a power guy.
With Fielder and LaRoche you keep Adam for late innings and as a good bench bat. Cameron and Shark/Ankiel as bench for OF and DeRosa and LaRoche for IF gives options for L/R hitters.
This would be a strong team this year with the improved pitching and get you more than the 10 wins we were short last year. Philly and ATL are getting old, Marlins are not there yet and NY is bad.
Has Fielder ever been considered ....
… for anything other than 1st base?? I’d rather see Morse there. Interestingly, Morse is 6’5" and Fielder is 5’11". Even with the righty / lefty thing, 6 inches in each direction is still a good bit of range to give up.
He may well have more range at shortstop than Guzman had
Although if Fielder dove it would be pretty tough on the infield.
Sort of like the Heath Bell All Star Game slide!
Heh.
"player development" should not be gladiator games. by cat daddy3000 on Aug 6, 2011
[replaces infield divot]
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Dec 30, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions

by 


























