The SSS Club - Henry "Lightning" Rodriguez
Henry Rodriguez will be a great asset to the club IF he can maintain his control.
Until Henry Rodriguez learns to throw strikes consistently, he will remain a low-leverage option.
Do either of those statements ring true to you? Versions of them have been and will continue to be thrown around whenever Henry Rodriguez is mentioned. Rodriguez throws extremely hard and has poor control. He has a statistical history that shows that his recent problems finding the strike zone are not entirely new. Admittedly, he is not usually quite as wild as he was on Saturday against the Marlins (3 BB, 2 WP), but historically he does walk at least one batter per two innings. He also throws pitches batters have trouble hitting and strikes out more than a batter per inning.
Henry Rodriguez has electric stuff. The question is whether the Nationals can trap that lightning in a bottle.
With the usual nod to the problems with small sample size, here is a look at what Henry Rodriguez has accomplished in 2011 and why he may well be on track to break out this year:
5 IP
1.80 ERA (4th on team out of 14)
3.74 FIP (9th)
4.42 xFIP (8th)
12.60 K/9 (1st)
10.80 BB/9 (14th)
.333 BABIP
88.9 LOB% (4th)
51 strikes, 49 balls (14th on ratio)
4.40 Total Batters Faced/IP (10th)
.188 AVG against (tied for 3rd)
.409 OBP against (12th)
.188 SLG against (1st)
.597 OPS against (4th)
Clearly, while Rodriguez sports a level of run prevention that is the envy of all but Storen and Clippard, he does this while allowing as many base runners as Lannan does, and it very much hurts how he is perceived. He has allowed nine baserunners in five innings, walking six and allowing three singles. The walks themselves are not really that dangerous, since he has demonstrated no tendency to walk runs in.
The free bases that have really hurt Rodriguez have been the 2 SB and 3 WP. The one run he allowed scored when a runner made it from 2nd to home on two wild pitches. If he can fix that aspect of his game while continuing to keep opponents to singles and walks there is no reason to believe he cannot be quite effective. Any cut in his walk rate would just be gravy on top.
What indications are there that Henry Rodriguez is a different pitcher from last year? One reason is his expanded pitch repertoire. Rodriguez is known for his blazing fastball, but he does have a slider, which he threw 14.1% of the time last year while using the fastball 81.7% of the time. This year, he has fully incorporated a changeup into his repertoire. So far he's thrown his fastball just 70.4% of the time, the slider 18.3% of the time and the new changeup 11.3% of the time. The fastball averages nearly 98 mph, the changeup touches 90 mph and the slider clocks in at a mere 84 mph. All three pitches are rated as plus pitches.
There are multiple benefits to the new pitch selection. It keeps batters guessing more, and when he has trouble locating that fastball, he has options to work the batters with. Whether the changes date back to his time with the A's or are something the Nationals are having him work on, it's working for him. He may have beat himself on Saturday, but no opponent has beat him yet.
Can he sustain this high level of production? Who know, but the future awaits to let you know. Is he ready to tackle high leverage situations? If not for those wild pitches, a runner on 3rd would be safe in his hands, but for now expect Riggleman to shy away from bringing him in with runners on.
The only Nationals pitcher whose pitches are harder to make contact with is Tyler Clippard, and Clippard is 6th in the majors among qualified relievers in this regard. A pitcher can survive walks if he can avoid solid contact and strike people out.
Unfortunately for Henry Rodriguez, what he brings to the club will never be properly appreciated until he stops allowing as many base runners as Todd Coffey does. Luckily for him, though, he has the arm and the talent to get outs and avoid runs. Even if his game ends up taking a setback in the coming weeks, his skill and the mental game may improve with age and experience. At his worst, he can be fun to watch. At his best, he may be amazing.
Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does the work.
- Mark Twain
31 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff, roach.
Looking at the pitch data on fangraphs, he’s featured a change and a slider since at least 2009, although he’s thrown both much more this year and last (1% CH in 2009, 4% in 2010, 10% this year). Given that he’s thrown only 99 pitches so far this season, it’s a little ridiculous to look at pitch-type linear weights, but I’ll do it anyway because the numbers are pretty and I’m an incorrigible homer:
FB: +1.19 runs/100 pitches (97.8 mph)
SL: +1.27 runs/100 pitches (83.7 mph)
CH: +4.78 runs/100 pitches (89.6 mph)
Now, his FB has always been a plus pitch, and it still is (in spite of its tendency to miss the strike zone, perhaps because it also misses bats). The real surprises are the “offspeed” pitches. Both of these were below-average offerings in 2009 and 2010, but so far this year they’ve both been plus pitches—the changeup especially so.
To put that it comparative terms, Lightning Rod’s change is better (on a per-pitch basis) than Drew Storen’s fastball (3.24 runs/100 pitches) or Livan Hernandez’ curve (4.42 runs/100 pitches).
Again, this is from a sample of 11 changes and 18 sliders, so salt with skepticism to taste. The wildness is not encouraging, but he’s showing more hints of promise and potential improvement than Daniel Cabrera ever did.
"I don't believe in luck, but it was just one of those things where it wasn't really skill, either." --Jerry, jr.
by Doghouse on May 9, 2011 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I was really encouraged by his off-speed stuff yesterday...
and totally fearful of the speed (but so were the batters…striking out quickly to get out of the way!)
But moar Lightening is exciting!
I hope he can put it together this year along with Rodriguez. They could be really valuable additions to the bullpen that will undoubtedly gets lots of work this year.
"Baseball is a game played by the dexterous but only understood by the POIN-dexterous."
Professor Frink (from MoneyBart Episode )
I'm hopeful, yet fearful
If he can make progress towards command/control, he may become Armando Benitez. If not, I fear he may be the bullpen version of Daniel Cabrera.
Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, but isn't a cucumber that small called a gherkin?"
by jbg2772 on May 9, 2011 5:04 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
Such a coin flip to me, that if he ever gets to where they could trade him for something more consistent though less flashy, I wouldn’t blame them at all.
I'm Cole Kimball, and I approve of this message.
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris is part of The Underground. Will you be?
So what you're saying is that Todd Coffey is blocking yet another quality young reliever from gaining experience.
I prefer “T” to Coffey. But I’m not even watching the games or following the box scores. Take what I say with a grain of salt.
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris is part of The Underground. Will you be?
MPH-Rod is too shaky to play in close games
Since most of the games are close, Coffey’s gonna pitch more. And, to be honest, he’s doing a pretty good job, too.
Rob
-- In baseball we trust.
Thanks for checking me on this one.
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris is part of The Underground. Will you be?
Can we define a "close game"?
Is it a five run lead like last night, or is it a three run lead or a two run lead?
by dc Roach on May 11, 2011 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Read "high-leverage situation" for "close game," and say leverage index >= 1.5 or so.
"I don't believe in luck, but it was just one of those things where it wasn't really skill, either." --Jerry, jr.
by Doghouse on May 11, 2011 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Before we can agree to be transparent on data, we must define what we are talking about.
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris is part of The Underground. Will you be?
+1000
First time poster, long time reader. I basically walked out of the Message Boards on the Nationals site because of a certain pessimistic Homer who won’t stop raging about how dumb the Willingham trade was. I have seen H-Rod pitch twice in person now, and even though we lost both games, two of the woeful Philly losses, it is very exciting to see this guy pitch. I have stated on other sites that control is something that actually can be taught, while speed is something that you either have or you don’t.
I’d like to see him left in the low pressure situations, and eventually he has the “stuff” to be a really good bullpen arm. I do think that the top brass should facilitate a trade for Broderick to move him down into the minors. The kid is good, but is really a back of the rotation starter, and is taking up a bullpen spot better suited for Ballestar. I’d also like to see some movement for getting Burnett some time in the minors to work out his stuff, maybe a stiff neck or dead arm injury. That would leave some room for Kimball to be brought up as well, and when Burnett is ready to return, DFA Slaten.
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
by Mattionals on May 13, 2011 4:10 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
welcome to FB!
Tough break for Broderick tonight. Also, a tough position to put him into. Lightning tomorrow for sure now, right?
Thanks!
Happy to be here! Much better community feeling here!
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
So,.......how dumb was the Willingham trade?
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 14, 2011 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Still too early too tell
I stand by Rizzo’s decision though for the following reasons. Everyone who has been a fan of the club and watched The Hammer play here over the past two knows that he has not completed a full season. Two years ago he was 29 games shy and last year was over forty games shy. He also has had spells at the plate, which the A’s are finding out right now. Since 2004 he has posted a positive UZR/150 only twice, and his average UZR/150 is -5.7. This doesn’t mean he is a bad player because his upside was his power and clubhouse presence. He is a very “this is what I bring to the table and that’s it” kind of player.
In return we received a flamethrower with correctable command issues who is incredibly young and has tremendous upside and a supposed 5-tool prospect who seems to be a late bloomer. Even if we don’t use Brown, he could be packaged up somewhere for a nice deal. All in all, I’d say Rizzo “wins” in the trade if either Willingham doesn’t produce for the A’s and hits the 60 day DL again, or if H-Rod becomes that late inning guy no one wants to bat against because he has devastating stuff.
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
I wasn't a real fan of Willingham, mostly for his defence..........I'd hoped his replacement would be an upgrade...
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 14, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but he was a basher in the heart of the lineup
which is something the Nats are sorely short of these days. I guess Nix has been serviceable lately.
Rob
-- In baseball we trust.
But remember when he almost had only twice the RBIs as homers?
meaning junk time solo shots….However, I would have preferred him over what we’ve seen so far…
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 15, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't remember that at all
He finished last season with 56 RBI and 16 HR. (??)
Rob
-- In baseball we trust.
May have been one of those early-season oddities.
I remember when Guz’ OBP was less than his BA for a while during 2008.
"I don't believe in luck, but it was just one of those things where it wasn't really skill, either." --Jerry, jr.
How does THAT work?
Lotta sac flies?
"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane
He had no walks or HBP's, but had one sac fly.
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 17, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Ah, Guz.
We’ll pick you up midseason! I know that once your family is better you’ll be happy to come back for the MLB minimum!
/sarcasm’d
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris after called strike 3: "I have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, and RUN AMUCK!"
by souldrummer on May 18, 2011 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions
2009: 24 home runs and 61 RBIs....
and that’s with the double grand slam game…There were some articles making a big deal out of it, at the time…
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 15, 2011 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions
RBIs are meaningless in Natstown
Nobody is ever on base! Get me some OBP guys and more higher leverage situations that can affect winning, and I’ll start being harder on RBI guys.
Unless they’re Adam LaRoche. Adam LaFAIL. [facepalm]
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
Derek Norris after called strike 3: "I have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, and RUN AMUCK!"
by souldrummer on May 16, 2011 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
2009: Hammer hits behind Dunn (.398 OBP) and Zimmerman (.364 OBP)
It was just a statistical anomaly that pointed to his 15 solo HRs, of which he hit 11 to start off that year before his first 2-run homer.
Riggleman: "He’s all about the LR matchups, but he doesn’t seem to spend much time paying attention to the actual players involved." by d_c_guy on Apr 30, 2011
by cat daddy3000 on May 16, 2011 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Control can be taught to an extent, but everyone has a ceiling
Not that I think H-Rod’s hit his yet.
Now, command can be perfected.
"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane
Agreed
I don’t expect H-Rod to be throwing a 95 mph two seamer that decides to drop sharp in front of the plate. You are totally correct that he can perfect his command with hard work and a good pitching coach and game caller he can get it. McCatty and Pudge should really be the keys to his success.
Name a number between three and five.
.............
.............
Threeve.
I believe that I was a little concerned about the Willingham trade as well.
These were my reasons:
1) I felt that his value was low after an injury filled offseason.
2) I feel that flame throwing relievers have low ceilings.
3) Rizzo’s ability to “win” less than obvious trades is my biggest concern with him. Yes, he won the Capps trade and for that alone he deserves a parade. But as of this moment, it appears that Burnett is a streaky LOOGY/7th inning guy and Joel Hanrahan is a flame thrower with potential closer stuff.
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
A lion and a militant to those unwilling to seek Truth; a lamb to all willing to share, listen, and build.
That said +1
You’ve set a rather high standard for your future comments, though. ;-)
Souldrummer twitters at @souldrummer25
A lion and a militant to those unwilling to seek Truth; a lamb to all willing to share, listen, and build.

by 

























