Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Washington Nationals 3-2 Over New York Mets On Stephen Lombardozzi's First Major League Hit.

• Citi Field Top 5: 

5. Bix And Lombo: With Ian Desmond (2 for 15 vs R.A. Dickey) and Danny Espinosa (0 for 11) sitting this one out, Brian Bixler gets a start at short and rookie infielder Stephen Lombardozzi is in a more familiar position at second in his second major league start on the right side of the infield. Neither Nat gets a hit off Dickey in front of Ryan Zimmerman in the first, and Zim's two-out single™ is the Nationals' only hit through two against the knuckle-balling Mets' starter. Washington's '06 1st Round pick, Ross Detwiler, throws a seven-pitch first, retiring New York's top three in order. Detwiler gives up a two-out walk and a two-out single in a 21-pitch bottom of the second which ends with Mike Nickeas flying out to right. R.A. Dickey retakes the hill in the third and retires the Nationals in order on 10 pitches, setting the 5th, 6th and 7th batters in a row down after Zimmerman's first-inning single...

Star-divide

4. Return Of The Det: Ross Detwiler throws a quick 8-pitch 1-2-3 third that leaves the left-hander at 36 pitches after 3.0 scoreless IP. R.A. Dickey needs just 15 pitches in his fourth scoreless frame, as he sets three more Nats down for 10-in-a-row after Zimmerman's first-inning single. Ross Detwiler's last turn in the rotation was rained out and he was skipped rather than pushed back, so it's been 10 days since his last start, which was against New York, when he gave up seven hits and six earned runs in just 3.0 IP in which the left-hander threw 48 pitches, 34 strikes. After that start, the 25-year-old left-hander told reporters it wasn't, "...arguably my worst outing. It's definitely my worst outing. Nothing worked, they hit everything I threw up there hard." Asked what specifically he had struggled to do, a clearly dejected left-hander said it was simple, "Bad location. Bad pitches. Just...everything." He's sharp through four tonight.

3. 10 for 24 vs Dickey: Jayson Werth breaks up a streak of ten-straight retired by Dickey with a leadoff double to left in the Nats' 5th, then the Nationals' outfielder ill-advisedly breaks for third on a grounder to short by Rick Ankiel. Jose Reyes fields and throws to third trying to cut down the lead runner, but David Wright's off the bag, in the basepath, and he drops the ball allowing Werth to get to third safely on a sure out. Ankiel's safe at first. Dickey gets Chris Marrero swinging through a diving 1-2 knuckler. Wilson Ramos comes through, however, singling up the middle to bring Werth home and put the Nats up 1-0 after four and a half. Nine pitches and three outs later it's 1-0 Nationals after 5.0 as Ross Detwiler throws a 1-2-3 5th to complete 5.0 scoreless on 59 pitches, 39 of them strikes. 

2. Two-Run Lead!: Ryan Zimmerman shoots an 0-2 knuckler from Dickey through short for a one-out single in the sixth. One out later, Jayson Werth smokes an 86 mph 2-1 fastball through David Wright at third. Wright can only close his eyes and duck with his glove extended, hoping the ball finds leather. It doesn't. Werth's 11 for 25 against Dickey after the single to left, but Jason Bay cuts it off to hold Zimmerman at third. Rick Ankiel's up next, 8 for 22 against Dickey when the AB starts, and 9 for 23 after an RBI single through second that finds its way up the middle with Mets' 2B just Turner playing the left-handed batter to pull. Zim scores on Ankiel's single and it's 2-0 Nationals in the 6th.

1. Abrupt End, Lombardozzi's First: Ross Detwiler sets R.A. Dickey and Jose Reyes down for the first two outs of the Mets' sixth, but the Nats' lefty gives up back-to-back two-out walks to Justin Turner and Lucas Duda, breaking a streak of twelve-straight New York batters retired. David Wright singles to center on the first pitch he sees to get the Mets on the board, down 2-1, and an RBI double by Angel Pagan ties it at 2-2. Detwiler's done: 5.2 IP, 3 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 3 BB, 2 K's, 83 pitches, 51 strikes. Wilson Ramos improves to 9 for 13 against Dickey (2 for 3 tonight) with a leadoff single to start the Nats' 7th. A wild pitch and productive groundout move the Nats' catcher around to third, and Stephen Lombardozzi goes with a 1-1 knuckler and sends an RBI single into left for his first Major League hit and a 3-2 Nats' lead after six and a half. Congrats, Lombo!

0. Clipp And Store: 11 pitches, 9 strikes for Tyler Clippard in a 1-2-3 seventh. The Nationals fail to add to their lead and their All-Star reliever comes back out for the eighth, setting three more Mets down in a seven-pitch, 1-2-3 frame in Citi Field. 6 up and down for Clippard. 3-2 Nationals after eight and a half and they bring Drew Storen on looking for save no. 35 of 2011, and his first save since August 22nd. David Wright walks on four pitches and takes second on a sac bunt by Angel Pagan. Storen gets up 0-2 on Jason Bay, and gets a backwards K with a filthy 1-2 slider. Two down, and Nick Evans pops a 1-1 change up to first, 3 outs. 3-2 Nats. 

• Miss The Game? The DC Faithful Were Watching...

• Doghouse's Post Game WPA Graph: "Game 145: Three more wins to third place"

20110912_nationals_mets_0_20110912205417_lbig__medium

via www.fangraphs.com

  • One more out to quality: Ross Detwiler (-8.9%) gets through 5.2 IP scoreless, then walks two, gives up 2 ER, and comes out.
  • Revenge of the scrubs: Steve Lombardozzi (+12.7%) singles in Brian Bixler (-21.7%) for the winning run (+18.9%).
  • Playin' wiffleball: Jayson Werth (+10.4%) is 3-4 with a double.  Wilson Ramos (+16.8%) is 2-4 with an RBI, and Rick Ankiel is 1-4 with an RBI (+17.8%).
  • I'm running out of synonyms for "dependable":  Tyler Clippard (+22.9%) throws two perfect innings in relief.
  • Only slightly interesting: Drew Storen (+17.5%) walks one but doesn't allow any runs to get the save.

Nationals now 68-77.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

okay Lombo, you got your hit....

now you take that with you to Syracuse next year and build on that……..

"LESS LOON...!!!" by MissB on Sep 12, 2011
"He only knows what strengths he wants his players to have." -by RobBobS on Aug 24, 2011

by cat daddy3000 on Sep 12, 2011 11:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Beat out????

Not if Dez is sitting in Minnesota

by artistfork on Sep 13, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

DEZ

Should have been part of a “Jason” Bourn deal……………..

by artistfork on Sep 13, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bourn is just that good,

I’d rather keep Werth in CF.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since the deadline

Desmond has been a better player then Bourn.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't sell Lombardozzi short

He’s a year away from the big leagues, but he’s a comer.

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree,

I just think that the way he has played lately, and the way Desmond has played lately, there isn’t long enough in spring training for Lombardozzi to win the job.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

No question

Spring 2013 perhaps…not before.

Note that the other Italian kid, Antonelli, didn’t even get a look this year, and he’s a good one too. As I have posted before, the one guy Davey won’t screw with is Zimm.

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

AdamKilgoreWP:
Lombardozzi’s dad, a former big leaguer, watched his kid’s 1st big league hit from the stands. Lombardozzi didn’t know his father was here.

by dc Roach on Sep 12, 2011 11:57 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel old now

The first game I ever attended was in the Metrodome (Red Sox / Twins in ’88). Steve Lombardozzi played that day – he went 0 – 2.

by monkeypuzzle on Sep 13, 2011 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I liked it when Stairs was around so I wasn't older than all of the Nationals...

BTW, that was the only reason I liked having Stairs around.

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Sep 13, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't feel old

If your first game attended was in ‘88, you’ve got nothing to worry about – my guess is many of the people here on this blog beat you by decades.

I’ll go first: first game, 1973 (Dodgers v. Astros in LA). There now, feeling younger?

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

he says, conspicuously avoiding reference to the year.....

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

If I had to guess I'd say 1985

My first football game however was January 17th, 1988. it wasn’t the kind of thing a person can forget.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, that Skins game against the Vikes WAS memorable....

….that’s the one, right? Couldn’t be the Browns game……ah, Ernest Byner, a very good Redskin, BTW.

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

God no, I hate the Browns.

RFK was really something back whenthe Skins were good.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

1988? Hell, that was yesterday

Top this: 1959 – Senators v. somebody (Griffith Stadium). Killebrew homered, and I’d never seen anything like it. I was hooked. Instantly. For life.

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Somehow, I expected to see "Senators" and "50's" in your reply.

True lifer. Inspiring. Don’t even want to hear about the 33 years of anguish – it’d be too painful.

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hard way to grow up, no error.

Teaches you about life.

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can top that

Not by much but at least a year maybe two or three… Also at Griffith… I can’t remember the game but I can still smell the bread

by PerryMason on Sep 13, 2011 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cigars - a smell that always transports me back to the old-time ballpark

Remember Opening Day 1960? We beat hell outa’ the Red Sox 10 – 1, IN THE SNOW (no accumulation, but it flew hard for awhile). Camilo get the complete game W, with the only Red Sox run coming on a Ted Williams solo homer into the big tree – yeah, that one, way out there just beyond the wall in dead center.

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn’t at that one… But I do remember “the tree”. It’s the reason the park had it’s quirky shape, with the bullpen tucked into the offset. When the park was built the home owner, God bless him/her wouldn’t sell his lot.
I loved that center field bullpen with the low wall around it.

by PerryMason on Sep 13, 2011 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was one of two in 1970

either Mets v. Braves at The Ballpark for Whom Larry Named His Son, where the Mets won when a Duffy Dyer pop-up fell untouched in the infield,
or a ball-day double-header in the Bronx, where the Yankees were swept by a forgotten opponent.

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Sep 13, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

The infield pop-up single - and here I thought Werth had just invented that one...

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

masn had some really creepy extreme closeups of nats fans in the 9th inning

I think I heard Lou trying to start a cheer but failing around the same time while Bay was up

by TJL on Sep 13, 2011 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Did they hire a FOX camera man?

They specialize in the dramatic fan closeup at tense moments.

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Sep 13, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

probably

the camera seemed to pull towards females wearing nats tshirts clapping over their heads

by TJL on Sep 13, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

According to Today's Preview at Nationals.com.....

….in the Worth Noting segment,

Since becoming the Nationals’ primary leadoff hitter on Aug. 17, Ian Desmond has batted .288 (30-for-104) with 14 runs scored, four doubles, four home runs and seven RBIs.

We all know he has improved during the second half, but I was unaware that he was doing so well at lead-off.

Link

"Integrity First, Service Before Self, Excellence In All We Do" - USAF Core Values

by sullyzz on Sep 13, 2011 9:31 AM EDT reply actions  

The numbers they used on the broadcast last night were since july 5th, and they were great.

Aim for the head baby Jesus

by Doncosmic on Sep 13, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

July 5 happened to represent the nadir of his OPS stat this year

It bottomed out at .554. Since then:
60/212 with 16 BB, 18 XBH, 24 runs, and 16 RBI. Slash line of .283/.335/.429.

He’s not exactly killing the ball, but he’s playing at a pretty good level for a shortstop.

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

68 wins. I predicted 67.

So the rest of the season is gravy. I don’t know if they’ll reach 75, but 70 should be a given. Congrats to the optimists!

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I did predict though that the Nats would score 25 fewer runs than last year

They are currently on pace for 628. They scored 655 last year.

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

The difference of course is in the pitching/run prevention

They are on target to allow 65 fewer runs. Score 25 fewer runs, allow 65 fewer runs —> around 4 more wins. They may do better than that.

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

But didn't they win fewer games last year than would have been predicted by run differential?

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point. They should have won 72

so they should win 76 this year, right???

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

We can hope that Atlanta and Philly will be resting many of their regulars

and otherwise might be disinterested. 76 seems like a makeable number.

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that there scoring may be rquivalent to last year

Since scoring is down around MLB generally. I haven’t run the numbers or rankings though.

by d_c_guy on Sep 13, 2011 5:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Don't count yer chikkins

I’m feeling a couple of 17-5 Orioles games coming up (OK, I’m not, really, but I can dream, can’t I?)

If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!

by ricksnats on Sep 13, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

NO taunting the Fish! They have totally pwned the Nats...

for years. Atlanta OTOH seems intent on gagging away its considerable lead in the Wild Card race.
STILL hoping for 70+ wins!

"player development" should not be gladiator games. by cat daddy3000 on Aug 6, 2011

by MissB on Sep 13, 2011 1:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Heh...I might be in your camp...was HOPING for 75-78...

but fearing much worse after the O-less SPAD formula and team were revealed._

"player development" should not be gladiator games. by cat daddy3000 on Aug 6, 2011

by MissB on Sep 13, 2011 1:24 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

One man's gravy is another man's you-know-what

I had this figured for a .500 season. G’head and laugh. I’ll be damned if we couldn’t – check that, shouldn’t have done it, or at least come a lot closer.

Too much shoulder-shrugging, I tell ye’. For the first 30 games it was, “Well, it’s early” [shrug]. For the last 30 games, it’s “Well, it’s late” [shrug].

Screw that. As I have posted before: EVERY LOSS IS HATEFUL, and every loss remains on your record forever. Hear me? For-evah. Even a DWI comes off your record someday (I think – and hope), but a loss in the big leagues you must wear, like that chick who had to wear the permanent red “A” (and she was not an Atlanta fan).

We could’a done it, by God – and if I’m Lerner, I’m thinking that next year we’ll do it or I’ll know the reason why (and have me a coupla’ bald heads onna’ platter).

"On my tombstone just write, 'The sorest loser that ever lived.'" - Earl Weaver

by Whupass on Sep 13, 2011 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

They never had a prayer at .500

A team with such a poor offense cannot expect to compete unless they feature a top line pitching staff. Any rational view of the Nats offense had them at best struggling to match last year’s mediocre run output; and the staff is better but not what I would consider “good”. A team that gives up 60 or 70 more runs than they score will not finish .500. That’s not an issue of them not trying hard enough; it’s an issue of they just aren’t that good a team and they were never projected to be.

Rob

-- In baseball we trust.

by RobBobS on Sep 13, 2011 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

My over/under on this team was 75 wins

It’s going to be a near-run thing …

by d_c_guy on Sep 13, 2011 5:54 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation's blog about the Washington Nationals. Federalbaseball.com Trying To Make Every Fan A Nationals' Fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cat_coons_small
***Pick6!!!>>>'''PLAY NOW'''<<<Pick6!!!***
Bugs-bunny-baseball_small
New GuessEm Rankings (5/24)

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
First visit to Nationals Park...
45859-188-008f_small
Why don't more players -- and teams -- do vision training?
Marion2_small
Odd Baseball Question
Joker460_1__small
Philly-Tears Milkshake Brings This Boy Back to The Yahd!
Small
No excuses... too many men left on base
Small
Speed Camera on I-395 in DC coming from VA
Small
Harper HR Poll
Photo-1_small
A few takes, and some queries, from a neophyte

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Ministry of Peace

Rizzo__kasten_and_chigliak_small Patrick Reddington

Ministry of Truth: Records Department (Editor)

Ws1_small Winston Smith

Ministry of Plenty

Teddy_clip_small Doghouse

Shadedlogo_small Dave at District Sports Page

Youppi_040618_mon_a_small bluelineswinger

Small d_c_guy

Adam_o_small jeff550

Imag0320_small SaratogaCountySports