Looking into a foggy crystal ball
Now that we know a certain rotund first baseman won't be part of the Nats 2012 lineup, we can start to make predictions about this year's team with a little more certainty. Most sensible folks wouldn't try this at least until spring training, but I've dusted off my somewhat rosy-colored crystal ball and am ready to make some well-informed predictions wild-ass guesses about a bunch of Nats-related performances in the 2012 season. So FWIW (not much, I'm sure), here's what I see for the coming year.
Leading the offense, I see a big year from Ryan Zimmerman, whether he's extended before the season or not. He stays healthy, has a career offensive year, plays his usual stellar D, and finally gets some recognition outside the DC area (All-Star selection, a top ten finish in MVP voting).
I see Adam LaRoche being the usual (non-2011) Adam LaRoche -- something like .271, 24 HR, 88 RBI. I see him sticking around the whole year, as his first half is (typically) not strong enough to make him really attractive trade bait.
Jayson Werth becomes a lot more popular with the DC faithful. I don't see him returning to his 2010 PHL level - but something like .260/.365/.465 will be useful, and his willingness to handle CF (and to do so fairly capably) for a chunk of the season will win over the bulk of the fandom.
Michael Morse is not exposed -- too much. I see his BA and OBP declining a bit, but the 30 HR power is still there.
Here's a surprise: I see a Bernadina/Cameron/(or someone) platoon turning in an extended period (say 2 months) of decent CF play far better than the black hole we have become accustomed to. The crystal ball seems to indicate that one of them will then get hurt, or will crater, or something -- but by then it will be Harper time.
As for young Mr. Harper, I see him coming up maybe June-ish, getting nearly 300 major league ABs before the season's done. He'll struggle at first (of course), and his final numbers won't look so great (maybe .242, 9 HR, 39 RBI), but there will be enough Harper-esque moments in August and September to make us look forward eagerly to 2013.
In the middle infield, I see that at years end we will notice that Desi and Espi have each taken a step forward in their development. But they will also each continue to be streaky during the season, so the progress won't be that obvious at times.
I see Stephen Lombardozzi filling the role of a useful utility man, a pinch hitter who can get on base, and a pinch runner who doesn't get picked off.
Not sure that I see anything clearly about our two young catchers. Have to let you know if that clears up.
On the pitching staff, I see good things from the Big Three. Gio Gonzalez does not disappoint, turning in a season as good as his last two with Oakland. JZim(nn) pitches as well as last year, but with an extra 40 IP and better run support his W-L numbers are a lot gaudier, maybe 17-8. Strasburg is Strasburg, but I do see one or two scares when because of a little twinge and some extra cautious handling he misses a start or three, maybe even goes on the DL for a while. I don't necessarily see him even getting to his 150-160 IP limit, but that also means he gets to start some meaningful games in September.
Chien-Ming Wang is a dependable back of the rotation starter, with 180-200 IP and a sub-4 ERA. John Lannan isn't.
Due to Lannan's troubles and Strasburg's missed starts, Ross Detwiler gets a real chance to show his stuff. He doesn't seize the opportunity, though, mixing a couple of flashy starts with a bunch of blah ones. But I see a few nice fill-in starts from someone further down the food chain --Gorzellany, Stammen, maybe even Maya or Meyers or Solis? (Can't tell - it's pretty hazy. But I do see Tommy Milone, 3000 miles away, turning in a real nice unnoticed year for Oakland, better than Lannan or Det -- or even Mark Buerhle down in Miami.)
The bullpen is good. Clippard's not as great as last year - who could be? -- but there are no weak links (coughSlatencough) and Storen remains strong so things are fine there.
Overall, I see this as an 85-90 win team -- hey, I said it was rose-colored crystal -- that stays in contention deep into September. I don't think I see any post-season play, not even the second wild card (is that official yet? I don't remember). But it should be a fun season.
Feel free to tell me what I've been smoking.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stop the Lannan hate.
“Chien-Ming Wang is a dependable back of the rotation starter, with 180-200 IP and a sub-4 ERA. John Lannan isn’t.”
I realize you are just expressing an opinion on the future, but there doesn’t seem to be any reason to believe this other than Chien-Ming Wang was once a shiny name for the Yankees, and John Lannan was not.
John Lannan is not an ace, but he has been a solid pitcher that was never given sufficient time to develop in the minors. Even with his terrible 2010, he has averaged 179.25 IP and an ERA of 4.00 exactly. He’s remarkably consistent of throwing 180-200 IP and with a sub-4 ERA. He was improved in 2011; velocity up, GB percent up, K/9 up, and showed more willingness to use his slider and change-up. Given how terrrible our rotation has been for past several years, I think that Lannan will make slight improvement in 2012.
#extendZim
by chubias on Jan 27, 2012 10:52 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Fair point
It’s just my hunch that we shouldnt count on both of them to have decent years, and probably the reason I favored Wang over Lannan was just that Wang looked better in September. Admittedly, not a great reason – but at least I wasnt claiming to have one.
lannan is legit mlber but hardly all that... or really improved
he will always have low Ks — to call 2011 an improvement is like a bronx cheer, and he doesnt have control to balance it out. he also gives up way more unearned runs than most, so his already poor era doesnt tell the whole story. all those grounders are hard to handle, likely because he has poor veocity AND movement, hitters lay off out of the zone, while pounding within it. dont get me wrong, hes fine at #5 but no more. Wang? could turn out very badly, but he did at one point show more ability than lannan will ever get a sniff at, so you never know.
btw, nice piece! funny AND smart…
by William.Hatheway on Jan 27, 2012 8:15 PM EST reply actions
Do you think his propensity for giving up UER is a trait?
I suspect it’s possible, but I’ve never seen any analysis to point to some pitchers just naturally and consistently being prone to the error-ball. He gives up grounders a lot, which are obviously more likely to be booted, but then again he’s also played with some pretty weak defenses behind him.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
i think his defense has to be explored, you are right
but yeah, i occasionaly get the ear of the hardball times and really want to make an argument that uer is a skill… considering not only lannan but also buehrle, for example. it just makes — toget awayfrom my saber heart — intuitive sense why this happens to him. i will absolutely expand samples and get back to you. i actually thought of this because i watched a lannan game 1 day after you mentioned that my stats stuff didnt have the benefit of your season ticket eyes, because what i saw was that his grounders were CRUSHED.
by William.Hatheway on Jan 27, 2012 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
also it was after taking his beats-fip-tendency to heart
that yes, that is true, but add in uer and you just have a non-“luck” reason why he is worse than his era…
by William.Hatheway on Jan 27, 2012 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
im agreeing there
saying along with you that it fip isnt the right formula for valuing him. but im also suggesting wh i think RA instead of era is. i gave reasons and would welcome differing reasons along with what they are based on (e.g. in case i brought up velocity, movement, amount of chase swings induced and amount of in the zone contact alloed. never did i mention Ks or promote fip here
by William.Hatheway on Jan 28, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
No major disagreement at this point, but
I will put forward Henry Rod. as a possible surprise for the upside in 2012. I am not terribly hopeful about LaRoche helping much, but I do expect another good year from Morse, possibly an even better one than in 2011. The offense may only improve marginally, but I believe we can get to the playoffs with the stronger pitching staff, as long as the defense is good (I want Ankiel to play a lot in CF until either Harper enters the picture in RF or a decent acquisition is obtained) and another good starting pitcher is obtained. Oswalt may fit the bill. If I had to name one guy who may hold the key to whether the Nats get close to the 90 win mark it is Jason Werth, The offensive lineup will be much more potent if he becomes dangerous. I will post my full assessment and predictions about the season some time in March.
You're probably right about Werth
He’s a bit forgotten after last year, but he could be the white knight that saves the O.
Did I just say that?
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Werth
I believe in regression to the mean, so I’m expecting Werth to be better.
I just think that given his age, the fact that he’s not in CBP, and the demands of playing CF (assuming that’s instore), we shouldn’t expect him to put up his 2010 numbers.
OTOH, I’m much more willing to predict (hope) that Zim puts up his 2009-2010 numbers, or even better. That just strikes me as the one big offensive improvement from 2011 that’s not too much wishful thinking. From the rest of the lineup, i hope for some modest improvements overall, but I’m trying not to count on any dramatic gains that arent likely to happen.
Nats in 2012
I think there is general agreement that pitching will be better than last year (maybe this is an understatement) – and I think that Wang will be the pitching surprise this year if he stays healthly and continues his recovery. We definitely have some depth as its a long season. I think it was Rizzo that said that teams should be prepared to use about 11 different starters over the course of a season. And I think that we will get the 88-90 wins necessary to squeak into the playoffs. I agree with the above comments that Werth and LaRouche should revert to the mean and healthy Zimmerman will provided the added punch we need. What will make this season exciting is that we have a shot at the postseason but not a lock – so every win and perhaps every big play will be important. Lannan deserves his shot and I think he will not disappont.
by natsbaseball.com on Jan 29, 2012 4:03 PM EST reply actions

by 





























