The Washington Nationals, Matt Purke And The Nats' Big Gamble.
The Washington Nationals felt comfortable dealing prospects like Brad Peacock, Tom Milone and A.J. Cole, D.C. GM Mike Rizzo explained to reporters after the deal, because there is already another wave of pitchers coming up in the organization. "With the [Matt] Purkes and the [Sammy] Solises and the [Alex] Meyers of the world," Rizzo said, you can make a deal that sends two of the top ten pitchers, a major-league ready arm and the top catching prospect on Baseball America's last list of your organization's Top 10 Prospects to Oakland in return for A's left-hander Gio Gonzalez and right-handed prospect Robert Gilliam. Though Baseball America's Jim Callis (@JimCallisBA) wrote on Twitter recently that the deal would drop the Nats a few spots in their organizational rankings, the Nationals were the ranked as the no.1 organization in baseball when this year's edition of their Prospect Handbook went to the printers.
"We also have a wave behind them of the [Robbie] Rays and the [Paul] Demnys and those type of guys behind them," Rizzo told reporters in December, "So, we feel that we're set up very, very well for the long haul."
Both 2011 1st Round pick, Meyer, and 2010 2nd Rounder, Solis, were on MLB.com's Top 100 Prospects list when it was unveiled this week. Matt Purke was ranked ahead of Solis on Baseball America's most recent Top 10 Prospects list as the top left-hander in the Nationals' organization before he's thrown a pitch in the minor leagues. The Nationals' GM described the 21-year-old, 2011 3rd Round pick, in an interview with ESPN980's Thom Loverro last August as a, "... polished accomplished pitcher," who has, "... really performed outstandingly well from his high school days through his freshman and sophomore year at TCU."
"He was a high draft and high dollar guy out of high school, that didn't work out," Rizzo said, referring to the events that took place when the Rangers drafted him in the 1st Round in 2009. Purke was (16-0) with 142 K's (10.99 K/9) and 34 BB (2.63 BB/9) in 20 games and 116.1 IP in 2010, leading the Horned Frogs to the College World Series. "And this year," Rizzo told the ESPN980 host, "as a sophomore, although he had some shoulder bursitis in his arm [and] still was (5-1) with, I think, a 1.70 ERA." It was a 1.71 ERA actually, to go along with a .187 BAA, 61 K's (10.42 K/9) and 20 walks (3.42 BB/9) in 11 starts and 52.2 IP. The Nats gave the left-hander a 4-year/$4.15 million dollar major league deal when they took him with the 93rd overall pick in the 3rd Round of this past June's draft.
The Nationals were comfortable giving a player who'd struggled with injuries all year a major league deal in large part because he'd submitted to an MRI arthrogram after the draft when he'd visited Washington to meet with team officials and doctors. "I just knew that, the only thing I could do was lay it out there and say 'Do what you want to do'," Purke explained to the D.C. press corps during his introductory press conference this past August, so he told the team, "... do the test, look at it, get your own assessment of it and then we can talk."
"He's a power pitcher that has good command of his four pitches," Rizzo told ESPN980's Mr. Loverro, "He's a polished guy with command, poise and stuff and we think he's a quick-to-the-big-leagues college-type of pitcher and we're really pleased at the person and we were satisfied with his health." At the press conference to introduce Purke, Rizzo said that the plan was to send the left-hander to Florida, "... and we're going ot have our pitching coordinator, Spin Williams down there. We'll assess where he's at as far as his readiness to pitch, and as Matt said I've seen him pitch recently and he's well on his way to pitching in a game so when we make that assessment we'll put a plan together to get him on the mound."
The Nationals were comfortable enough with what they saw in Florida that they sent Purke to the Arizona Fall League, where he struggled at first pitching against the top prospects in the game, allowing 12 hits, three walks and 11 earned runs in 7.1 IP, though all eleven runs came in his first three outings and he ended the AFL season with four scoreless innings pitched over four outings. Washington Times' writer Amanda Comak spoke to both Doug Harris, the Nats' director of player development and Paul Menhart, the Nats' pitching coach who accompanied their prospects to Arizona this fall, and wrote that, "His fastball velocity rose to 96 mph, and that sharpness he’d been searching for began to return to all of his pitches as he worked through a few mechanical tweaks," in the AFL.
Now Purke will take part in at least the first few weeks of Spring Training with the major league team before he's assigned somewhere in the system to begin his pro career, with High-A Potomac a likely destination. How long before he moves up to Double-A wheere he'd be reunited with a promoted Paul Menhart, his development will determine? How quick a "quick-to-the-big-leagues" pitcher is Purke? The Nationals gave the left-hander a major league deal and were willing to trade major-league ready pitchers because they believe they've acquired enough high-end arms in the last few drafts to make it possible.
"The plan three years ago was to attack the draft before the new CBA," Rizzo told reporters this week, "That was our focus, that was our vision, that was our strategy going into it three years ago and we did it, we attacked it for the last three years and I don't think you'll see a draft class like last year's because of the new CBA rules."
Purke might have been the biggest risk they took over the last three drafts. Is he a quick-to-the-big-leagues lefty or, "'... a guy with shoulder issues, a guy with a bad delivery and a guy that you probably shouldn't be spending $4.4 million on,'" as FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal quoted a source saying last summer?
190 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
mumble, mumble, Rosenthal mumble bow tie.
#extendZim
getting to you, too, huh?
"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."
by cat daddy3000 on Jan 29, 2012 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
I could use some help
My wife and I am planning a trip to DC for the April 14 game against the Red. We could use some suggestions about a good valued hotel near the stadium.
Sharon Marsh "Stan, what did I tell you about being a smart ass?" Stan Marsh "Don't be a smart ass"
John S West Jr
by Adam double bubble on Jan 30, 2012 9:06 AM EST reply actions
eh
I don’t know what has sprung up there recently per se. If I were you just find a hotel near a metro stop, and something thats convenient to the other sites of the city. The Nats stadium is really the only attraction in that area (though its kind of close to the Capitol), but that isn’t a nice walk.
So do China town or Dupont circle (avoid hotels in Georgetown because there really isn’t a usable metro).
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
Seconded, there isn't much down there yet.
Though I am excited about the Brewery that will be opening down there in about a year.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
I agree.
If you can find a place in China Town, which is on the Green Line metro (same metro line as the ball park) that’s probably your best bet.
If you don’t mind changing trains, then Dupont Circle or Woodley Park could work. Woodley Park is probably the least crowded of the three areas and there’s a Marriott and an Omni hotel there.
Stay in DC if you can
Virginia is super nice, but it isn’t the Nation’s Capital.
For value, I would see what was cheapest around Chinatown/Convention Center/Penn Quarter a couple of days before you left. So long as there isn’t a huge convention in town, you should be able to find a great deal. It would be a short Metro ride to the ballpark, and there are some great restaurants around there.
If American standard is your fare, try Bobby Van’s, Georgia Brown’s, Arcadiana, Old Ebbitt, or Chef Geoff’s (metro center). I haven’t made it to these, but I have heard great things about Hill Country, Carmine’s, and Luke’s. Tasca is good too.
If you are thinking about staying in Capitol Hill, there aren’t many hotels but you might be able to find a deal on an executive suite that goes unused. And there are a ton of restaurants on the Hill now. I’d try Matchbox, Cava, Chesapeake Room, Ted’s Bulletin, or if you want some Eastern NC BBQ, go to Port City Cafe (if open — short hours b/c they are church going folks, which is a good thing).
If you want to be a little edgy, go to H street NE for Granville Moore’s (best meal in the city). Either go very early before the game (to avoid a line) or if you are up for it, go after the game, put your name on the list, drink and the Pug (bar next door) for an hour and then eat. If you want some more DC, go 8 blocks down H Street to HR-57 for some Jazz — cover and corkage fee, but it is BYOB (RIP Junebug — house drummer just passed).
I could go on, but this post is too long.
Also recommended: Botanical gardens, walking the mall, and ….GO NATS!
Cherry blossom festival
April 14 is during the National Cherry Blossom Festival there will be lots of tourist in town. The Cherry Blossom Parade is on the 14th from 10am – noon. I doubt anything will be cheap that weekend.
I would not wait to couple of days before get a bargain room.
Georgia Browns is far from american standard, it is classic soulfood at it’s best, plus it was featured on the best TV show ever, so it is still a bit hard to get a table, even years later.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Babylon 5 was good, but hardly the best ever, not even the best Sci fi ever, I meant The Wire of course.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
thanks for clearing that up
I never watched Babylon 5, so I didn’t have the nerve to ask what the heck you all were talking about.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
no, Doncosmic, you are wrong. Babylon 5 was the best TV ever, sci fi or not..
do not anger Delenn…“he is behind me; you are in front of me; if you value your lives, be elsewhere”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mURWOwkFPM
Babylon 5 “No Surrender, No Retreat”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qGLPCcjK2c
"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."
by cat daddy3000 on Jan 31, 2012 8:48 PM EST up reply actions
(had to look him up, and The Wire...)
sounds like a great show, but I bet they didn’t have to do CGI with Video Toaster on a Commodore Amiga…..
"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."
by cat daddy3000 on Feb 1, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
And the rock cried out, no hiding place.
#extendZim
I will add that Marriott just recently took over the Red Roof Inn in Chinatown, and the Irish Channel Restaurant downstairs is a great place as well. The Marriott (I think it is a Fairfield Marriott) is located at 500 H Street, NW, and is not only a quick ride to Navy Yard and Nats Park via the Gallery Place Metro, but also just a couple blocks away from the Verizon Center. As for dinning, Clydes, Matchbox, and the District Chophouse are also nearby. I forgot about the Cherry Blossoms….so yeah, reservations should be made NOW, and maybe even YESTERDAY. And for anyone coming in mid-May, forget about it…..that area of DC is packed with visitors for National Police Week, since the Police Memorial is nearby.
My nice affordable Red Roof Inn is gone :(
I stayed there for two years just about every time I came to D.C., no more of that.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 31, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe the Marriott will have decent prices also….it is a Fairfield which is one of the cheaper Marriott chains.
Few times I've checked back, their rates had doubled.
Too bad for me, was the perfect spot for food/entertainment and a block from the Gallery Place Metro.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 31, 2012 6:59 PM EST up reply actions
No question about it (if you are not intimidated by big cities) downtown D.C. is beautiful, fun and the place to be. I’d definitely go with Penn Quarter/Chinatown area too! It’s only 2 miles from the ballpark but not especially walker friendly. Metro or cab is the way to go.
The National Portrait Gallery and the American Museum of Art are favorites and are right there and of course the Smithsonian is an easy walk.
(again, if you enjoy a cigar and a relaxing place to catch a game on TV Shelly’s Back Room is a short stroll away on the 13 Hundred block of F St…. I mention this because I don’t think Livo’s Red Porch Cigar Bar will be open for business by April…)
there's a VERY nice B&B five blocks away
the “Casa Degli Angeli” — caters primarily to longer terms (I stayed there last year while working at Library of Congress May through July). Very reasonable: it’s a very short walk to the park and two blocks to Navy Yard Metro.. The innkeeper (GREAT guy) was thinking of trying to attract ballpark customers for short stays. He has a website. May be booked, but can’t hurt to ask.
by Joe Hardy Fan on Jan 30, 2012 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
Capitol Skyline on South Capitol St. is alright .....
by NewJerseyAveSE on Jan 30, 2012 10:02 AM EST reply actions
Thanks.
We will look for something on the Metro line. That’s what I thought, but wasn’t sure.
We stayed at the Old town Hilton in Alexandria several weeks ago and that’s right across the street from a metro stop, so we will probably do that again.
Getting excited about my first season as a Nats fan.
Sharon Marsh "Stan, what did I tell you about being a smart ass?" Stan Marsh "Don't be a smart ass"
John S West Jr
by Adam double bubble on Jan 30, 2012 10:37 AM EST reply actions
Embassy Suites Hotel - King Street Metro - Alexandria, VA
There is also an Embassy Suites Hotel directly across the street from the King Street Metro in Alexandria, VA. Since you stayed at the nearby Hilton, you also know that the King Street Metro is nearby Old Town Alexandria, where there are a ton of restaurants, shopping, and a riverfront. BTW….I highly recommend Bilbo Baggins Restaurant in Alexandria, located at 208 Queen Street. Good luck, and enjoy a Nationals Win!
We thought about Bilbo Baggins
last time we were in Alexandria. I will try to sell it to my wife. She is naturally hesitant about anything Sci-Fi related, and food.
I am already looking at the schedule and my guess is Gio will pitch on Saturday the 14. I am really looking forward to rooting for a team that cares about winning.
I have been reading about Bud Selig starting the extra wild card team this year. Has anyone confirmed this yet and that has to increase the chances of the Nats making it into the post season. Any thoughts?
Sharon Marsh "Stan, what did I tell you about being a smart ass?" Stan Marsh "Don't be a smart ass"
John S West Jr
by Adam double bubble on Jan 30, 2012 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
I'm completely against the "NBA-ization" of MLB
Each time they expand the playoffs they dilute the meaning of the long regular season. If you can’t prove you’re the best team to face the other league’s champ in 162 games, then you probably aren’t the best team to face the other league’s champ. I say this despite the notion that the Nats’ playoff hopes in the short term depend pretty strongly on the existence of a second wild card.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
by RobBobS on Jan 30, 2012 12:24 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
I do like the idea of a one game playoff between the wild card teams
As it is now, a division winner has to play a wildcard team. If two wild card teams have a one game playoff, the winner of that game would have just used their ace, thus giving the division winner an advantage in the next series.
As it is now, there’s really no difference between winning the division and being the wildcard, but the proposed change would fix that, making the division a much better prize.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
by rfk428 on Jan 30, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I was just writing something similar but you beat me...
If we’re stuck with wild cards in baseball…I’m glad there are two WCs with a one game playoff so they’re not on equal footing with a team that won their division.
You pretty much stated my exact opinion.
by RossingtonCollins on Jan 30, 2012 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
Unless you are eliminating the play-offs, I don't see the harm in a second wild-card.
As it stands now, plenty of teams that clearly did worse over the long haul of the season, get into the play-offs and once you are there anything can happen. The only way to avoid this would be to eliminate the leagues, have every team face each other an equal number of times, and a team with the most wins is champion. I’m not saying that this is what you are advocating, but under your system, the championship could still be won by a team that was less good, but strung together a good run of games.
Personally, as long as the postseason remains a challenge, I don’t see the problem. Yes, the St. Louis Cardinals were a 90-win team that simply got hot at the right point. Yes, the Phillies won more games. So what?
I don’t think a second wild-card will make a big difference either way. The second wild-card teams route to the WS will run through 3 teams that are all supposed to be better than them. And because of that, they will likely lose. If they aren’t beaten, I’m sure that will be a heck of thing to watch.
Where I do think the game will change is at the trade deadline. I don’t think it is that unusual to see a wild-card team that has a better record than some of the division winners. There are probably a dozen cases where a team misses the playoffs despite having a better record than a division winner. With 5 teams from each league advancing, I think this will happen less frequently, and you will see more teams “going for it” instead of waiting for next year.
#extendZim
The more rounds of playoffs you have,
the more likely you will have a lesser team get the pennant.
Let’s say you have this scenario: at season’s end, the Phillies have won 101 games, the Braves 98, the Reds 93, the Giants 89, and the Cardinals 87. Under the current system, the playffs would be Phillies/Giants, Reds/Braves with a very possible matchup in the 7-game ALCS of Phillies and Braves — where the winner would be good representative regardless. Under the proposed new system, the Cardinals would play the Braves, and despite the Braves’ overall superior talent, the Cards win the matchup of aces. Or maybe the Braves win, regardless they would still only face the Phillies in the 5-game NLDS, which is nearly always unsatisfying.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
This is not true.
“The more rounds of playoffs you have, the more likely you will have a lesser team get the pennant.”
This is not strictly true. Imagine your standings, however, instead of having the Braves play the Cardinals, the Giants play the Cardinals. If the wild card was simply a new route to the play-offs, then the 2 teams from each league with the worst record played a single game elimination; the result would decrease the likelyhood of an 87 win team going to the World Series.
We don’t know exactly what the new system would look like so it is impossible to say. However, based on the rumors that we hear:
1. There is every reason to believe that this system will favor division winners because the wild cards will need to spend thier aces in the tie-breaker. Thus, you are less likely to see loafing by comfortable division leaders.
2. Your scenario only works if you assume the following: that one wild card team is dramatically better than the division winners and that one wild card is worse; that the new tie-beaker would only feature wild cards instead of the 2 worst records; and that the winner of the wild card playoff would automatically face the best ranked team insisted of re-seeding based on regular season scheduling.
3. Finally, in your scenario, if the Cardinals were to beat the Braves, Phillies, and Reds, then I think they would have pretty good claim to the WS.
#extendZim
As indicated
here, in two of the last 12 NL seasons, the second wild card would have gone to a team that was significantly, wildly worse than the “first wild card”. In 2002, the 84-win Astros would have played the 95-win Giants. Imagine if the Stros’ had pulled that one out! The Giants’ great season would end ignominiously in one silly play-in game. And it’s worse in the AL (much worse). In seven(!) of the last 12 years, there has been a difference of at least six games between the two ersatz playoff teams. In 2001, the two teams would have been separated by 17 games! That doesn’t help balance power, that helps poor teams advance in the playoffs.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Ah, but how do you account for the psychological impact of the knowledge of the 2nd wild card? More teams are going to “go for it” because more teams get that extra chance (even if it’s only one game or whatever), won’t they? And especially at the end of the season you’ll have fewer lame ducks that just stop playing, won’t you?
Of course there’s no way to even remotely quantify this, but the addition of the “hope” x-factor could make things more even than they had been. At the very least, more interesting down the stretch.
So what?
You have 9 instances where the wildcards would be divergent over 12 seasons. However, there are 10 times, when teams with better records than the division winners did not make the postseason.
Additionally, I am curious in your 9 instances, what was the difference between the last place division champ and the would be second wild-card?
I’m not saying that the new system will make the playoffs “fair” but this current system is no better. And if this system lets some poor broken down fan in Toronto, Pittsburgh, KC, or lets face it Washington, finally get excited because their team is in the postseason for the first time in 19, 20, 27, or 32 years, then let them play tag on your lawn. You weren’t finished reading that newspaper anyway. All these systems are going to have flaws, the new system isn’t any worse.
#extendZim
For once I agree with you, Rob
Blame expansion, I guess. BITD there were eight teams in each league. No East, no West, just NL and AL. They played a 154 game schedule, which produced two pennant-winners, then a world series, period. Life was pretty simple.
Now we got 32 teams, with three divisions in each league – and inter-league games thrown in, just for fun. The inevitable result is interminable post-season play. Indeed, we’re becoming like the NBA – or what’s worse, the NHL – where they play two seasons: a long exhibition season (can’t really call it anything else), followed by another season to determine a champion.
What the hell is the alternative? Dunno, maybe a re-organization into two leagues of 16 teams each. No East, Central, West, North, South, or what have you. Just NL and AL, playing a regular season of say, 190 games, with NO inter-league and NO post-season play, apart from a WS.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Hell, I can't keep track anymore
Ye’ gotta be a geography nut to even know where somma these places are. Solve that problem by naming teams after states, instead of cities. Not as bad as NBA and NFL. Yet.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Odd-sized leagues means all-year interleague play
which is definitely NOT how it should be.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
by RobBobS on Jan 30, 2012 4:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
There shouldn't be different amounts of teams in the different leagues.
So, are you suggesting contraction or expansion?
32 is a good even-even-even-even-even number
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
This isn't a big obstacle.
Aren’t the Astros moving to the AL? I believe so, and good riddance to them. Here, take the Mariners back while you’re at it. Had no business here anyway.
Hell, teams can be shifted and re-arranged as needed – particularly those in weak markets. When the old AFL and NFL merged, the Colts, Steelers, Browns (now Ravens) were paid money to shift to the new AFC because it was felt they’d lose TV revenue. My point? Organizational obstacles are easily overcome. It’s only money.
The necessary sea change is to do away with all this post-season play, before it effen drowns the game. How do we do it? Here, you figure it out, Rob. You’re a smart guy, now get ’er done.
As for a 190 game schedule…hell, izzat a trick question? Like I can get enough baseball.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
My bad - I meant the Brewers
who went from AL to NL
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Spent to many years as a Royals fan to endure a 190 season.
At some point, you have the let team’s go home, lick thier wounds, and talk about the next year.
#extendZim
The problem with this is it would make way way too many games completely meaningless and attendance would plummet.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
I think a middle ground is OK.
Two teams in each league face off in a seven game championship series, as it was done for a couple of decades. It’s quite reasonable, there will still be plenty of meaningful games, and the teams winning the pennant would have a very strong argument as being the proper representative.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
The first time a 95 win Yankee team missed the playoffs, but an 8 something win team from a smaller market won the west, Fox would throw a fit.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Well that would be worth it right there. ;-)
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
I'm pretty sure we've agreed before
…can’t remember what it was, but I’m sure of it!
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Trust Me.....
Bilgo Baggins Restaurant has nothing in it related to Sci-Fi, so your wife should feel pretty good about that…….it is actually a rustic, ole’ country pub and restaurant, with an excellent beer and wine selection. Really good food. Great atmosphere. Someone also mentioned King Street Blues, which I agree, is also a nice establishment.
Several years ago I was in Kings Street Blues drinking a blue hurricane during a huricane.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Well, there are drawings of hobbits and other such things on the walls
And for weekend brunch I am partial to “Frodo’s French Toast.” But since hobbits are fond of seven meals a day (when they can get them), the food reflects that appreciation of food. :-)
Luvs' me some elevensies
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Do they sell waybread sandwiches?
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 30, 2012 9:54 PM EST up reply actions
I like the Embassy Suites better than the Hilton too.
Biibo Baggins is great especially since they remodeled and opened up the bar to the dining room. Probably the best beer and wine selection in Alex.
My favorite Alexandria restaurant is LaPorta’s. Nice dining room, great food, great happy hour deals on food and drink, live music 7 nights a week (mostly jazz), and walking distance from the King St. Metro.
Another favorite in Old Town is “219”. Live jazz upstairs and you can smoke a cigar there too!
LaPorta’s is on my list of one of the next places I visit…..always wanted to go there, but never have yet. BTW….Does anyone else miss Generous George’s since they moved all the way to Dulles? I sure do!
Joe Theismann's Restaurant
Good sports restaurant walking distance from the King St. Metro. Lots of big TVs with good game. The food is good.
I think I like the idea
of a one game wild card round. There is also no reason this has to be written in stone. If a couple of years go by and it clearly is a mistake, I hope Baseball would have the wisdom to get ride of it. However, as it stands now I am willing to be open minded about it.
Sharon Marsh "Stan, what did I tell you about being a smart ass?" Stan Marsh "Don't be a smart ass"
John S West Jr
by Adam double bubble on Jan 30, 2012 12:52 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Any guesses as to the best case scenarios, i.e. Quickest
for any of these guys – Meyers, Solos, Purke, Ray – make it to the big leagues?
I'll go Solis, Purke, Meyers, Ray
Solis pitched at AA and if he can stay healthy (big IF), he could be a September call-up this year. Ray is the youngest, so I think he’ll take the longest. It’s kind of a crap shoot between last year’s draftees, but I’ll guess Purke first because of his upside. Although if Meyers gets moved to the bullpen, he might make it first.
It will be very interesting to see where the ‘11 class begins this season. I’ll guess Potomac for Rendon and Purke and Hagerstown for Meyers and Godwin.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
At any point?
Or in the beginning of 2012. Barring injury he’s def gonna be a Sept callup at the latest. Zimm made it up in Sept of his first year, and by all accounts Rendon is a much better pure hitter.
"It’s hard to be good. It’s easy to not be good." -Coach Turgeon
Zim was Drafted in June, signed immediately and was up in Sept.
He started in A ball, moved to AA then was called up. Maybe we see a similar path for Rendon, assuming he’s 100% healthy of course.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
Disagree
They were able to bring him up because their org. was awful.
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
It was their second year of existence…
by RossingtonCollins on Jan 30, 2012 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
thats a bit misleading
they were the expos. the team just moved.
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
what difference does it make if the team was awful?
He came up and finished 2nd for ROY (many thought he should have won it).
He wasn’t up because the team was awful he was up because he was ready.
the difference is that Zimmerman is now at 3rd base
So you think Rendon is going to come up and take at bats from Zimm?
Is he going to take at bats from Espinosa?
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
The difference was Vinny C. was leaving.
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
Rendon is blocked at this point
You going to take at bats away from whom? Desmond/Espinosa? I highly doubt that the org is ready to move on either.
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
point is he won't immediately have the impact opportunity that Zimmerman had.
He came at a time where there was opportunity for him to play immediately. the Nats are fortunate that its not true with Rendon. Rendon is probably a quick to majors guy, but there needs to be some shuffling at the MLB level to make that happen, and Desmond and Espinosa still need to exhibit their value.
This year will say lot for the org, but we do not have the open position battles like in the past. the only real position battle is CF.
You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!
Hmmmmm…….I am not only on the Dez bandwagon, sometimes I think I am driving it; however, absent some significant improvement, I could totally see those ABs being taken away from Dez, with a shift of Espi to SS. However, I am still holding onto hope that Dez has a remarkable turnaround this year, and lights the park up with the bat. Having said that, I don’t think DC even sees Rendon until sometime mid 2013 at the earliest.
He played SS at UVA [spits]
because Mark Reynolds was at third
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Never said it was
Just answering your question. College was the last time Zimm played enough SS to mention.
Lots of guys come up playing one pos, then – for whatever reason, possibly a sharp-eyed manager or coach in the bigs, or some other circumstance – they change. Morse came up as a SS. Harper came up as a catcher. Hell, Mickey Mantle came up as a SS. Ol’ Casey saw him take a couple grounders, walked out and said, “Get to the outfield, kid, and don’t come back.”
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
If Harper didn't have any real chance to make it up in one year
despite playing a position of need and displaying a rare combination of power and discipline, then I strongly doubt that Rendon — who plays in a locked position, hasn’t played much at all in the last year, and has a lower ceiling than Harper — will have any hope either.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Rendon has some more hope of making it in one year
because he has a lot more experience than Harper did, but like I said earlier he would have to start at Harrisburg, and reports say that is unlikley at best
MOAR SEVERINO!
I think a September call-up this year for Rendon is not out of the question...
even if he starts in Potomac. If his bat is as advanced as we hope, he could move up to AA pretty quickly. Some scouts don’t think he can play 2B so it will be interesting to see where he plays in the field. LF could also be an option to get him on the field, as well as 1B.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
If I am remembering right
there has never been a player under Rizzo to go from Potomac to Washington in one season, and when there are articles like this out there, I dont get the impression Rizzo thinks he will be in Washington
MOAR SEVERINO!
Also, the Nats have never had a hitting prospect as well regarded as Rendon
While Harper ranks off the charts, he was known to be raw. Rendon is a polished college hitter who’s already one of top prospects in all of baseball without playing a game.
If anyone can do it, a guy like Rendon would be the perfect candidate.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
There are questions about Rendon
And not just about his shoulder. After his numbers fell off last year (from “otherworldly” to merely “really, really good”) there was some concern that he was a metal bat phenomenon – that his power didn’t make the jump to BBCOR metal bats, and thus wouldn’t translate to wood bat play. Rendon is well regarded, yes – but he never had the hype or upside that Harper has gotten. The next web site that I see that regards Rendon as a better hitting prospect than Harper will be the first one that I’ve seen.
Not better but pretty damn good
If Purke and Rendon had been in the 2012 draft they most likely would have been 2 and three, after Harper, and there would have been serious doubts about who was better. I think any injury that affected his throwing that much would have had an impact on his swing, and probably mostly on his power.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
By 'well regarded' I meant more polished
Meaning he’s closer to a finished product than Harper.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
by rfk428 on Jan 30, 2012 6:21 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
As of the time they were drafted, yes
But at this moment in time, Harper is clearly the closer to MLB-ready player.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
True,
Though that could change quickly, and I think Harper will be in MLB first regardless of readiness because Rizzo likes guys to spend time in the minors. There is also the fact that Rendon will most likely be changing positions. While it won;t be much comfort this season, I still believe a lineup that includes Rendon and Harper will make the team quite competitive offensively in 2013, regardless of who is in CF or at SS.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
Yes
This discussion was about going from A ball to DC in one season.
I think Harper will be up by June. But I also think Rendon has a great chance to be a Sept call-up even if he starts in Potomac.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
by rfk428 on Jan 30, 2012 7:08 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Long term
I could see Rendon (and I have no evidence to back this up other than he was a undersized awesome hitter in upper echelon DI without a real position) as an Edgar Martinez-guy-you-can’t-keep-out-of-the-line-up-but-he-is-in-the-NL-so-we-have-to-find-a-position-for-him type player. Not saying he has Edgar’s knees, but I bet he can hit.
Harper has the best upside of anyone on the planet. And even if he doesn’t fulfill that, he will still probably be an All-Star.
I can see lots of 2 strike singles, walks, and RBI doubles in the gap from Rendon. Bat him 2-hole, but where do you play him? I don’t know.
One big difference from Edgar
Is that Rendon, by all accounts, is a plus defender.
exactly, Rendon has a great glove and would be a great glove at 2b or 3.
The scouting reports lamented the fact that his range is somewhat limited, because if it was better, his reaction time and arm would have made him a great SS.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
I will assume you meant Alex Meyer, and not Brad Meyers who we should get back from the Yankees
Quickest would be in this order IMO
Solis, Purke, Ray, Meyer, but I think that you can switch Meyer/Ray very easily.
Upside your probobly looking at something like
Purke, Meyer, Ray, Solis
Solis has the potential to make it in September if he has a good year, Purkes ealiest I think would be Sep next year. Ray and Meyer are both a fair ways away from the majors
MOAR SEVERINO!
Speaking of Brad
Anyone have a clue how the Yankees bullpen is shaping up? I think they’ll have a hard time carrying him, so hopefully he’s returned.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
assuming no trades, this is what I got
rotation
Sabathia
Pineda
Kuroda
Nova
Garcia
bullpen
Hughes
Burnett
Joba
Rivera
Soriano
Robertson
Logan
and there are some other guys who would be ahead of Meyers.
MOAR SEVERINO!
Yeah, I don't think the Yankees would have wasted the money on a Rule 5
if they didn’t think he had a chance to make the team. They won’t make “every effort” to keep him, but they won’t just toss him without seeing if he could help.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
I dont think the Yankees saw themselfs getting Kuroda and Pineda
when they took Meyers. Take out one of thoes two and he has a spot, but with them he dosent. I also dont think that Yankees are worried about Rule V money
MOAR SEVERINO!
by jeff550 on Jan 30, 2012 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Wasted money? Rule 5 is not a lot of money
Certainly not to the Yankees. I agree that the Yankees thought that Meyers had a chance to make the team when they picked him up last Fall. Since then they’ve traded for Pineda and signed Kuroda and Garcia. Even if the Yankees move Burnett (lotsa luck there) the RHRP competition in NY has gotten much tighter since they picked up Meyers.
No matter how you slice it, the math is not on Meyers’s side. I differ a bit from Jeff in that I think that Burnett likely starts in the rotation with Garcia as the long guy in the bullpen. Joba starts the season on the DL (as does Pedro Feliciano – what a waste of money that was). So with a seven man bullpen there are five slots that are nailed down (Mo, Robertson, Soriano, Garcia, Logan). Competing for the two remaining slots are Hughes, Cabral (Rule 5 LHRP), George Kontos, D.J. Mitchell, David Phelps and Cory Wade. Oh, and Meyers. Seven guys for two spots. Phil Hughes is a former top prospect working his way back. Cory Wade was great for the Yankees last year (1.034 WHIP, 2.04 ERA, 6-1 record in 40 games). Cabral is left handed. I think those are your top three. Of the rest, Meyers probably starts ahead of Mitchell but behind Kontos and Phelps on talent, with a very slight push because of his Rule 5 status. The Nationals can’t write him in, but they should be prepared to pencil him into the Syracuse rotation.
by d_c_guy on Jan 30, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
It is possible that Meyers has already done everything he was supposed to do, give the Yankees some leverage so as not to appear desperate.
Not that many teams were going to buy the Yankees throwing a Rule 5 in the rotation, though I think Meyers might suprise folks. But clearly the Yankees got more mileage out of thier 2011 rotation than anyone ever expected. So, while they were negotiating they could say “well, we would like X, but we don’t HAVE to add a pitcher.”
This is not to say that I think that Meyers isn’t talented; quite the opposite. But even a little leverage for the Yankees was easily worth a few thousand.
#extendZim
The leverage point is reasonable enough
I will say that the Yankees always viewed Meyers strictly as long relief; there was never much chance that he’d fit into the rotation.
Thanks for the run-down
Meyers was definitely seen as a long man for this season but with the pickups they’ve made to their rotation, I think who ever loses a spot in the rotation will take Meyers spot in the bullpen.
I predict he’ll be returned during spring training once they’re certain no injuries pop up. The Rule 5 money is pocket change to the Yankees.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
you really think hughes does not make the team?
by William.Hatheway on Jan 30, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
Hughes may be stashed in the rotation at AAA
To keep him ready for starting duty if they move Burnett and Garcia’s renaissance doesn’t translate to 2012.
MASN is starting to air a series of Nationals Classics tonight
and every Monday through April 16 at 7 pm, except for April 9, which airs after the Reds-Nats game.
Tonight’s game is from July 6, 2010 vs Padres with a walk-off homer by Zim
Something to get me through the rest of the waiting for spring time
just looking at the list I printed from MASN and the dates are messed up
anyway, every Monday through April 23 at 7 pm
Off topic, but are we doing a fantasy baseball league again this year?
I’d certainly like to.
We Aim to Maim - JoseRijo es mi Amigo aka court
So we should be blaming YOU?
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
yes
i take full blame, which is why i will castigate myself by playing in a money league with two professional fantasy writers (goal is fifth, a free 2013 entry)
by William.Hatheway on Jan 30, 2012 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sure we will do a league or two again...
Dave from the District Sports Page ran them last year, i’ll ask him about doing them again.
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 30, 2012 9:51 PM EST up reply actions
No more teams...........
Lets play 162 games to play ONE MORE?……….$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Anyone else watching the Nats Classics on MASN tonight?
It’s like a weird blast from the past – Nyjer Morgan in CF, Dunn at first, Guzman at 2b, Livo on the mound and Pudge behind the plate.
Watching now
Thanks for the tip!
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Plenty of guys here I do not miss
But damn, I will miss Livan.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
fixed -- Nyjer steps in
Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"
Weird - Capps on the mound for the Nats
And both Jerry Hairston and Matt Stairs with the Padres
Nice to see a catcher who can handle a relay throw
Hammer to Desmond to Pudge to nail Jerry Hairston at the plate! FOTF to lead off the bottom of the 9th! I have a good feeling about this game …
Nice job, Ryan
Looking forward to/Hoping for a healthy season from Ryan this year. MOAR WALKOFFS!
This game was a sobering reminder
…that from time to time, and for no apparent reason, Clippard takes spells of flat-out ineffectiveness.
…that we are immeasurably better off with Espinosa in the middle infield, Nyjer in another city, and Riggleman out of our dugout.
…that despite his prickishness, Dibble was way better than FP will ever be.
…and that all the Rendons in the world notwithstanding, if Rizzo doesn’t make Zimm a Nat for life – and soon – he is nuts.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
Don't care to expound on which three, do you?
I myself am very open to allowing Zimmerman to walk under certain circumstances. Specifically (1) he proves himself fragile again this year, and (2) Rendon plays a top-line hot corner in 2012 A – AAA, and (3) Zim’s salary demands become untenable. At this point the Nats can step back and ask whether signing him up “for life” will really be in the team’s better interests.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Boo! Boo! Boo this man for even entertaining the thought.
No, you don’t have to boo. I get it, Rob. But boy would I hate to see him go.
If I had to lay down any bets on DC’s disagreement, it would be the Dibble vs. FP equation….
If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!
If #2 but not #1 and #3 then I assume you would want to move Rendon to another position and resign Zimm, correct?
Or get a top-flight starter/center fielder for him.
And I mean, top flight.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
By "him" I mean Rendon.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Assuming # 2 and Zimm is resigned because he healthy and doesn’t ask for the moon (which I don’t see him doing) then I think it’s more likely and better that Rendon plays second paired with either Espi or
Ian and the Nats pick up a FA CF’er. That could be a pretty slick team there.
It could be
but the Nats’ biggest needs right now are in CF and 1B. Then SP. MI’s they got.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
There are FA CF’ers available in 2012. That doesn’t seem to me to be a big problem (not to mention there are also some possibilities within the organization).
I think Morse will be at first next year (after finishing 2011 there).
So the question is what sticks will they have playing at short and second.
My money is on Rendon being one of them. (and I agree with Whup that Espinoza ends up as the Nats SS of the future).
Hopefully Ryan Zimmerman plays his entire career as a Nat.
If Purke is the real deal then that is certainly the case.
Stras, Gio, Zim(nn), Purke….. that could be one hell of a rightly lefty mix.
Aim for the head baby Jesus
If Zimm is allowed to walk, the baseball gods will surely fling us into hell. Zimm must stay.
And this does not block Rendon.
If the young’n pans out as expected, a more likely scenario is that Desmond gets traded – possibly as part of a deal for that CF we need so badly – Espy moves to SS (and we would not lose a thing in that trade-off), and 2B becomes open for Rendon. If Zimm goes to the DL (as has been known to happen), Rendon’s there to fill in at the hot corner, with Lombardozzi or a player-to-be-named filling in at 2B.
Desmond remains the best active position-player we have that we can “afford” to trade.
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
If Zim wants 8/yrs $175M
I say, good luck sir.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
But do you thin anyone would give him that?
Or do you think that merely by letting him get to free angency that the Nats would have fouled the waters enough to no longer be a contender in the bidding?
Aim for the head baby Jesus
It's all pretty hypothetical
but you’ve got to imagine that he’s thinking big after seeing what Pujols, Fielder, Braun, and Tulowitzki signed for in the last 10 months.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
The gods would cast us into hell, I tell ye' - every damn last one of us, and deservedly so
My word, what would the Braves or Phillies not give for our Ryan Zimmerman? 8/175? Hah! In a friggin’ heartbeat.
Rob, you flirt with disaster – and far worse than sport or financial. You stand on the beach, before you an angry ocean of bad kharma – a damning legacy to rival the Bambino Curse – and you stand there, with your eyes covered.
Thou fool. Have you taken leave of your senses? No, I say!
Let us speak no more of this. [exits, stage right]
"I can go to my left or right, I am amphibious." - Charles Shackelford
by Whupass on Jan 31, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
[Crowd leaps to applause. "Encore!"]
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds
Bravo!!!
"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."
by cat daddy3000 on Jan 31, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
#hethrowsweird
Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."
by Patrick Reddington on Jan 31, 2012 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
We've got to admit,
he’s not. Longoria is better. He’s probably the best in the NL though.
Rob
--"Well my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." -- Mal Reynolds

by 




























