Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Wire Taps: Washington Nationals, Ryan Zimmerman Still Talking Contract Extension.

BALTIMORE, MD - MAY 20:  General Manager Mike Rizzo of the Washington Nationals talks to the media before the game against the Baltimore Orioles at Oriole Park at Camden Yards on May 20, 2011 in Baltimore, Maryland.  (Photo by Greg Fiume/Getty Images)

All D.C. GM Mike Rizzo said about the ongoing negotiations with 27-year-old '05 1st Round pick Ryan Zimmerman during a brief interview from Viera, Florida with FOX5 DC reporter David Feldman, was that the two sides continued to talk. Meanwhile sources were talking to reporters all around baseball telling them that a deal was close though significant hurdles remained.

"Sources: Zimmerman, #Nationals close on extension, but potential deal-breakers remain. Zimmerman has set Saturday deadline for deal," FOXSports.com's Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) wrote on Twitter tonight. "Zimmerman deal with #Nationals would be for at least six years, sources say," Mr. Rosenthal continued in a follow-up report, "Potential deal-breakers unclear, but described as 'real.'" Former D.C. GM Jim Bowden (@JimBowdenESPNXM) took to the Twitter to write that a Nats' sources told him, "Negotiations with Ryan Zimmerman continue to progress positively but still a lot of work to do for both sides.'"

Star-divide

Washington Post writer Adam Kilgore's sources, as he wrote on Twitter (@AdamKilgoreWP), are telling him that, "The most notable remaining hurdle for the Nats and Ryan Zimmerman is the no-trade language." In an article tonight following up on the tweeted reports, the WaPost writer noted that though the two sides continued to talk today, "They are not necessarily that much closer to a deal than they have been for recent weeks."

"Zim is, he' s the face of the franchise," the Nationals' GM told FOX5 DC's David Feldman, "He's a terrific player not only on the field, but he's a terrific guy in the clubhouse and in the community. He's part of the furniture here in Washington, D.C. and we'd love to keep him here throughout his entire career. We're in discussions, we're talking all the time, we've kept the dialogue moving and any time that you have a player who wants to be here and a front office who wants him here and an ownership group that wants him in D.C. then it's ripe to get a deal done."

Asked about the deadline Zimmerman set to get a deal done, the Nats' general manager said, "Zim put a deadline in there, because nothing's about Zim. It's all about his teammates. He doesn't want it to be a distraction to the guys in the clubhouse, so I'm not putting a deadline on it. [Zimmerman's agent] Brodie Van Wagenen and myself, we're going to continue to talk until we get this thing done and hopefully it will come to fruition and we'll get a good result."

Comment 68 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If the trade clause is the only hold up

as i read on mlbtraderumors…then this is either a)a joke [that thats the hold up] or b)going to get done by saturday.

by NatsFan18 on Feb 23, 2012 9:33 PM EST reply actions  

Depends on what else they "agreed" on

If they agreed in principle on a 10/200 deal, then yea I can see the no trade clause being the hold up. But if it’s like 6/110, then I agree just give it to him.

In general I agree, though – if the only issue is no-trade then the deal should get done.

by mk7676 on Feb 23, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

by the 3rd year, he'd be a 5-10 guy anyway and gets his no-trade then....

shrug…………….points at Rizzo….

"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."

by cat daddy3000 on Feb 23, 2012 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Zim has just a tad over 6 years of service time.

It will require four more years BEFORE he is eligible for 5/10 status.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he's saying

by the 3rd year of the new contract, not 3 years from now.

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Feb 24, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Having said that,

are “trade kickers” legal in MLB? That is, Zimmerman agrees to a “below market” rate in exchange for the added years, but there’s a clause that, if he’s traded before his 10-and-5 rights take effect, the contract goes from $XM per year to $X+YM per year. Of course, that makes the contract less attractive to prospective trading partners, but it addresses any “betrayal”.

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Feb 24, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't know of any rule against them, but they're disliked.

It can cause the same kind of problem as K-Rod’s vesting option.

If Zim/Nats DO want to do it that way, the best thing would be to include in that kicker (the $YM per year part) that the Nats have to eat at least that part. So if he’s traded, his new team keeps paying him the X per year, and the Nats pay him the Y per year, even if they don’t eat anything else of his salary.

"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane

by Jorgath on Feb 24, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Zim's ML service: 6.032 (6 years, 32 days )

yes. it will be during the 4th season from now. “For service time purposes, a full season is considered to be 172 days.”

172-32 = 140………..so mostly the whole season.

"...I don't want to go watch American League baseball." -Lance Berkman....
I wanna watch the "... tape-measure-testing, laser-throwing, eyeblack-oozing baseball cyborg."

by cat daddy3000 on Feb 25, 2012 12:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Braun

Good for him. I would like to hope that all the j-holes who said he should be stripped of his MVP will now offer their apologies. But they won’t.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 23, 2012 11:02 PM EST reply actions  

This is good news for Braun and the Brewers, but does it open the door for “cheaters”
who plead herpes?

by PerryMason on Feb 23, 2012 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Just saw MLB network update. MLB is “vehemently” disagreeing with the result. Plus it was a 2-1 split decision. Have to wait until Braun speaks tomorrow to get a better idea of what’s happening. His reputation will still take a big hit. The Brewers can thank their lucky stars that they’re getting their MVP back for 50 games, though.

Waiting to bang my drum in parades for the Nats and Caps.

by souldrummer on Feb 23, 2012 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

The 2-1 decision isn't surprising...

One arbiter is an MLB rep, and one is a MLBPA rep, so Shyam Das was the only unbiased rep of the bunch. That said, I’m concerned about what this means for the perception of infallibility the MLB testing program had worked tirelessly to build over the last 5 years. It seems like Braun and his attorneys found some loophole relating to how the urine sample was stored (or something, we may never know what really happened), and instead of exonerating him, it raised more questions than it answered. In addition, this verdict could open the door for others to exploit loopholes in the system, as this was the first steroid “conviction” ever overturned by the arbitration board. While this was great news for the Brewers, I think it couldn’t have gone worse for baseball as a whole.

The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of the Morse

by Nationalpastime9 on Feb 23, 2012 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Just read a USA article on the case. It’s the technicality of what happened to the sample more than the sample results that led to the reversal. My understanding is that Braun still had elevated levels of testosterone. The split decision of the arbitrators also lets me know that there was doubt in here.

Waiting to bang my drum in parades for the Nats and Caps.

by souldrummer on Feb 23, 2012 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

His never argued anything other than it took too long for it to be shipped

He never explained why he had synthetic
Testosterone in his system. I think this is bad for baseball because it more than any other sport needs the appearance that everyone who cheats gets caught and punished.

"I was a victim of a series of accidents. As are we all."
---Malachi Constant

by The Herndon Kid on Feb 24, 2012 4:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I read the sample was kept overnight in a lab techs home fridge

I can see why This got thrown out.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 7:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I heard he was taking meds...

for something. Maybe herpes is what I heard? That or some other STD. If that is the case and it was medication perscribed by a doctor then he definitely doesn’t deserve a suspension.

by dawgjk9 on Feb 24, 2012 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, kept in the fridge

in a sealed package the whole time, which showed no signs of tampering whatsoever.

as far as i’m concerned he’s still dirty.

by JordanH on Feb 24, 2012 8:10 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I suppose you are as vigilant about hunting and firing those that leaked the story in the first place then?

I think that is the real problem with the story. Is it possible that Braun was cheating? Absolutely. Was that ever proven? No. Will he still get tagged with the “cheater” label? Absolutely. Why? Because somebody profitted by leaking the story.

#extendZim

by chubias on Feb 24, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Right

I think a large issue is the leak.

People should be prosecuted. I can’t believe that this goes on, and people just accept it.

Just imagine for a second that Braun is innocent. You can’t, because he was forever given the scarlett letter. Everyone loves this holier than thou stance in the media. Regardless of his usage, that stance makes me sick.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Whoever leaked it to the news is in violation of HIPPA.

Can’t really blame ESPN, unless they…hmm…“compensated” the leak source, but the leak source violated federal law about medical privacy.

"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane

by Jorgath on Feb 24, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Urinalysis

At least the procedures when it comes to handling the samples, is VERY particular about the chain of custody. They are never to be left unattended by trusted personnel, and when stored must be in a secure receptacle (i.e. an approved safe).

Results for testing for other substances for the purposes of criminal prosecution are inadmissable if that chain of custody is broken, for any reason.

So I can see why they threw these results out. Someone from the lab got careless.

I don't have a very high opinion of southern California, in sports or in general

by short_shifter on Feb 24, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Not So Fast

All we know is that the arbitrator overturned the suspension. No written decision has yet issued to explain the decision, and there are any number of reasons the arbitrator may have found for Braun, including reasons that have nothing to do with whether Braun’s dirty. Might be a technicality with the chain of custody, or it might be some other mitigating reason that would explain a dirty sample and persuade the arbitrator to overturn the suspension. The arbitrator has 30 days to submit the written decision, and we don’t even know it the decision will be made public. As for the 2-1 part, the reality is that the award is 1-0, because the other two arbitrators typically are not neutral.

by NatsFan26 on Feb 24, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

exactly +1

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

As any regular TV-watcher would know

the tech broke the “chain of evidence” by taking it home and out of the supervised location. That makes the sample invalid, regardless of what the test showed.

If this is the sole reason Das sided with the union rep, then Braun got away with one. However, I also agree that, without the leak, nobody would have known (and who knows if there are other cases where the suspension was reversed but there was no leak?) and this would not be an issue.

I’m all for whistle-blowers, but this ain’t that. Whoever leaked the results/news has to face the consequences of his/her actions.

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Feb 24, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

You May Be Right, But Then Again...

I don’t think we know yet how the sample was handled. It will be interesting to learn the basis of the decision. Until we do, it’s too early for Braun to start thumping his chest. There’s a difference between an overturned suspension and innocence.

by NatsFan26 on Feb 24, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't matter.

We know it was handled in a different manner than all other valid tests. The slightest variation theoretically could affect the test, but that’s not important. What’s important is that valid tests are valid because they all use the same method, so they can be compared against a test of control samples. The method on this test was different due to human error, therefore this test is not scientifically comparable to the same control tests, therefore it is not valid.

"I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
-Leslie Nielsen, Airplane

by Jorgath on Feb 24, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

An old friend

I know this isn’t related to the topic at hand, but a friend of mine sent me this link about an old friend of the Nats who is up to his usual hijinks –

by futbolclif on Feb 24, 2012 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

Mark Zuckerman:
Zim: “Point of me signing deal is to be here. Not to sign a deal that’s team-friendly to have it with another team.” bit.ly/zLVXKH

“The big things have to be taken care of: The years, the money, that kind of stuff,” he said. “The big parts of the contract. There’s obviously little things in the language that take a little bit longer to take care of. But if we can most of the big things done by Saturday … it doesn’t mean I have to sign the contract by Saturday. But we have to have the pressing issues, which are a few things, done by Saturday.”

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 10:15 AM EST reply actions  

Wow, back up

I agree whole-heartedly with Zimmerman here.

http://www.natsinsider.com/2012/02/zimmerman-on-contract-talks.html

Why sign a team friendly deal without a non-trade clause? It really makes him more tradeable, but thats not his goal in signing a team-friendly deal. He is doing it to stay a Nat. Give him the no-trade clause. You can’t have the best of both worlds.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 10:16 AM EST reply actions  

Well, we don't know the whole picture so we shouldn't rush to take sides

That said I do find it kind of strange that this is really an issue. Zimmermann will get 5 and 10 rights in 3 years, which should be the prime of his contract. Perhaps the Nationals are holding the no-trade clause as a bargaining chip for getting the salary deferred or something like that. I hope they can get this done though.

#extendZim

by chubias on Feb 24, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

he could get traded in those three years

and if his contract is team friendly, its not like suitors will be afraid to chat.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

He wants to sign a team-friendly deal with the Nationals

He does not want to sign a MLB friendly deal. That is completely legitimate.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I understand all of that.

I am saying that I can’t see why the Nationals would want to trade him in the next 3 years. But there maybe something that the Nationals want in the contract, like backloading the salary or an option year at the end.

As an aside, we have no idea how team friendly the deal is.

#extendZim

by chubias on Feb 24, 2012 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Any speculation on years and dollars?

I have no idea what sort of deal they may be approaching. 8/150? 6/100? 10/200? 200/10?

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Right. That's why I said "speculation".

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

OK. Let me try again...

Would anyone HERE care to speculate on the years and numbers?

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

haha.. you want conjecture, not information. ok, here goes:

Since he’s under contract for two more years atm and wants to spend his career here, which would suggest years over dollars, I’d expect a time of around eight years.
Dollars is harder.. I wouldn’t expect him to match Kemp’s 180M for that time frame, but it should be well over 150M.

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

meant to say “over 150M”, not “well over 150M”

they’d be buying out a 13M and 14M season and giving him 18M per at 150M/8yrs.. He’d be paid a touch more than Werth.

If he signs for less, that’s great, but would be unexpected in my book.

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Heyman has apparently speculated "18M per".

https://twitter.com/#!/JonHeymanCBS/status/173015553601052673

Not sure this is extraordinarily “team friendly”, especially without knowing the years. It would already boost the money he was to make in the next two years by $10M.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, that link's not going to work, obviously.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

To be clear,

let’s say dc roach’s notion of 8 years is accurate (it seems reasonable). 8 years, 18 million dollars equals 144 million for the contract. But he was already signed to play for $12M this year and $14M next year, so the Nats are paying an additional $144M-$26M = $118M for 6 additional years, which works out to be about $19.7M per year for 6 years. That’s a fair chunk of change, which Zim would have merited two years ago, and may very well merit again provided he can remain healthy. Can he maintain a 5-WAR production for the next six years? Would this contract be slam-dunk team friendly?

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Werth got overpaid at 18M per year. Werth was putting up 5 WAR per year. Zim was putting up 7 WAR per year.

Obviously, the injury concern may be huge. If the expectation is that Zim can’t hit 7 WAR again in his prime, that could potentially depress his price below 18M per year. We don’t know what they know.

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

$18M is not bad for a 5-WAR player

Trouble is, nobody really believed Werth would be a 5-WAR player for the entire life of the contract. Zim’s a lot younger, but it’s not unreasonable to assume he’ll have begun a natural decline by the end of an 8 year deal.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

if he is a 5 War player

Thats a great deal. what is a win worth, 4 or 5 million, and by the end of the contract it will be worth more than that.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Read all the man-love on Rendon

If the most optimistic forecasts pan out, his performance would be comparable to Zimmerman’s at a fraction of the cost. Under that scenario, the Nats would flip Zim for a missing piece (CF? “better” option at SS?)

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Feb 24, 2012 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Why when you have one of the top 20 players in Zimmerman?

Zimm has already stated that he’ll move to any position as long as the team is winning. We have plenty pitcher. We have plenty prospects. There is only one Ryan Zimmerman. I’M ON TEAM RYAN !!! Hell NO DON’T LET HIM GO !!!

by Berndaddy on Feb 24, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Durability is a concern

Love Zim, but he misses lots of time. No reason to think he’ll become more durable as he ages. I’d sign him, don’t get me wrong, but that’s a factor the Nats have to consider.

by NatsFan26 on Feb 24, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Torn ab

Is not a torn ligament or achilles.

You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry!

by Bsullivan on Feb 24, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah? @Kurkjian_ESPN:

“Ryan Zimmerman just told us that he is close to a contract extension with the Nationals.”

Boo!!

@washingnats: I just spoke to #Nats 3B Ryan Zimmerman. He is not close to a contract extension — yet. His agent and Mike Rizzo have yet to talk today.

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Feb 24, 2012 10:43 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Oh dear.

I haven’t yet recovered from the gripping saga of the Fielder negotiations, as seen played out on Twitter.

[“Avert your eyes, Rob… Just don’t look… Don’t look…”]

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Mark Zuckerman:
No idea what his velocity is, but Brad Lidge is hitting his catcher’s target as well as anyone I’ve seen in #Nats camp.

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

I read somewhere (another FB thread?)

that any ML pitcher should be able to hit his target at this stage of camp (i.e., no batters, etc.)

Brain: "Pinky, are you pondering what i'm pondering?"
Pinky: "Yes, ... wait, ... no, ... never mind"

by jbg2772 on Feb 24, 2012 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe the radio guys will talk about him more now..

Dan Hellie:
Bryce Harper is very coachable @BHarper3407 sporting redskins gear pic.twitter.com/yPmICq9r

by dc Roach on Feb 24, 2012 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

NPUT...

Quick update on Sammy Solis’ elbow…

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Feb 24, 2012 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

Don't scare us like that!

When I first saw that, my thought was “great, another TJ surgery.” There’s nothing wrong with a recap for those who came in late, but boy howdy, did you worry me there.

by d_c_guy on Feb 24, 2012 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

If it's going to have to be TJ

I hope they figure it out soon.

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry. If it was TJ, you can bet those words would be in the headline.

#theymakemepayattentiontoseohelp!!

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Feb 24, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh?

Rob

--"Ten percent of nuthin' is...let me do the math here...nuthin' into nuthin'...carry the nuthin'..." -- Jayne Cobb

by RobBobS on Feb 24, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

My attempt at Search Engine Optimization humor.

stresses, "attempt"

Vivian Jaffe: "Have you ever transcended space and time?"
Albert Markovski: "Yes. No. Uh, time, not space... No, I don't know what you're talking about."

by Patrick Reddington on Feb 24, 2012 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation's blog about the Washington Nationals. Federalbaseball.com Trying To Make Every Fan A Nationals' Fan.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cat_coons_small
***Pick6!!!>>>'''PLAY NOW'''<<<Pick6!!!***
Bugs-bunny-baseball_small
New GuessEm Rankings (5/24)

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
First visit to Nationals Park...
45859-188-008f_small
Why don't more players -- and teams -- do vision training?
Marion2_small
Odd Baseball Question
Joker460_1__small
Philly-Tears Milkshake Brings This Boy Back to The Yahd!
Small
No excuses... too many men left on base
Small
Speed Camera on I-395 in DC coming from VA
Small
Harper HR Poll
Photo-1_small
A few takes, and some queries, from a neophyte

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

GAMETHREAD SPONSOR

Masn_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Ministry of Peace

Rizzo__kasten_and_chigliak_small Patrick Reddington

Ministry of Truth: Records Department (Editor)

Ws1_small Winston Smith

Ministry of Plenty

Teddy_clip_small Doghouse

Shadedlogo_small Dave at District Sports Page

Youppi_040618_mon_a_small bluelineswinger

Small d_c_guy

Adam_o_small jeff550

Imag0320_small SaratogaCountySports