clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Nationals reportedly sign Matt Wieters to 2-year/$21M deal... What’s next?

So with the Nationals reportedly adding Matt Wieters on a 2-year/$21M deal, what’s next for Washington? Is a trade for a closer the next step?

MLB: Baltimore Orioles at Washington Nationals Brad Mills-USA TODAY Sports

Way back in early December, after the Washington Nationals acquired catcher Derek Norris from the San Diego Padres,’s Roch Kubatko reported that Mike Rizzo and Co. in the Nats’ front office might still be looking to add a catcher.

Norris, in spite of his struggles in 2016, seemingly gave the Nationals the everyday backstop they were after with Wilson Ramos departing via free agency.

But, “Not so fast,” Kubatko wrote at the time:

“There’s a sense in the industry that the Nationals will pursue [Matt] Wieters and flip Norris if they get him. Norris is a nice fallback option. It’s the proactive approach.”

Washington Post Nationals beat reporter Chelsea Janes wrote on Twitter, however, that from what she was hearing at the time, the Nationals were not considering signing the former Baltimore Orioles’ backstop, who was coming off a .243/.302/.409, 17 double, 17 home run, 1.7 FWAR campaign in his eighth season with the O’s:

The prevailing sentiment in the nation’s capital was that the Nationals might be open to a deal “at the right price” while nationally, one reporter after another heard that it would eventually end up with Wieters signing in Washington.’s Buster Olney wrote on December 21st that, “[s]peculation is rampant in the industry that eventually Matt Wieters will land with the Nationals.”

Just last week, Olney’s colleague at ESPN, Jayson Stark, wrote that he was once again hearing chatters about the Nats and Wieters working something out.

Stark talked to a source that said the Nationals might consider Wieters, but only if the 30-year-old catcher would take a one-year deal:

According to reports this morning, the Nats and Wieters have agreed on a 2-year/$21M deal that gives the Nationals depth behind the plate with (assuming the deal is made official at some point in the near future) Wieters, Norris, Jose Lobaton, Spencer Kieboom, Raudy Read and “Catcher of the Future” Pedro Severino all on the 40-Man roster, which was full after the Nationals signed first baseman/outfielder Adam Lind last week, so one way or another, roster moves will follow an official announcement.

So what’s next? There’s a prevailing sentiment out there would suggest that Kubatko’s original report might end up being right in the end:

And this from Ken Rosenthal:

Severino would likely be the top target for any team looking for a catcher, with his reputation as a strong defensive backstop and recent uptick on offense, which had been a question mark throughout his rise through the ranks of the Nationals’ organization.

There are also a few writers out there who see this as an “ownership move” rather than one made primarily by Rizzo and Co. in the front office, since the relationship between Wieters’ agent Scott Boras and the Lerners has been written about ad nauseam over the years following the Rafael Soriano and Max Scherzer deals (which were reportedly negotiations between the agent and Nats’ owners, though Rizzo, of course, had history with Scherzer):

Will what has been viewed as a weak winter of building by the Nationals, who have tried to sign a number of closers, but failed to land a big name closer, be thought of as a strong showing by Rizzo and Co. if the Nats can now deal from their catching depth to get a late inning arm like the White SoxDavid Robertson as speculated above?

Are you surprised the Nationals gave the 30-year-old Wieters two years and $21M?

Will they still be willing to take on the $25M left on the four-year/$46M contract Roberston signed with the Sox in 2014 if a deal can be worked out now?

Or would the White Sox have to eat some of that money in any potential deal?

The conversation from Washington to West Palm Beach, FL has certainly changed in the last few hours...